Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, UK.
Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, UK.
Cognition. 2020 Feb;195:103810. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
Substantial research has been undertaken to understand the relationship between spelling and sound, but we know little about the relationship between spelling and meaning in alphabetic writing systems. We present a computational analysis of English writing in which we develop new constructs to describe this relationship. Diagnosticity captures the amount of meaningful information in a given spelling, whereas specificity estimates the degree of dispersion of this meaning across different spellings for a particular sound sequence. Using these two constructs, we demonstrate that particular suffix spellings tend to be reserved for particular meaningful functions. We then show across three paradigms (nonword classification, spelling, and eye tracking during sentence reading) that this form of regularity between spelling and meaning influences the behaviour of skilled readers, and that the degree of this behavioural sensitivity mirrors the strength of spelling-to-meaning regularities in the writing system. We close by arguing that English spelling may have become fractionated such that the high degree of spelling-sound inconsistency maximises the transmission of meaningful information.
大量研究致力于理解拼写和发音之间的关系,但我们对字母书写系统中拼写和意义之间的关系知之甚少。我们呈现了一项对英语写作的计算分析,在此过程中,我们开发了新的结构来描述这种关系。辨别力捕捉给定拼写中包含的有意义信息的数量,而特异性则估计特定声音序列的不同拼写中这种意义的分散程度。使用这两个结构,我们证明了特定后缀的拼写往往保留给特定的有意义的功能。然后,我们通过三个范例(非单词分类、拼写和句子阅读过程中的眼动)表明,这种拼写和意义之间的规律性会影响熟练读者的行为,而这种行为敏感性的程度反映了书写系统中拼写和意义之间的规律性的强度。最后,我们认为英语拼写可能已经变得碎片化,以至于高度的拼写和发音不一致最大限度地传输了有意义的信息。