Suppr超能文献

南非 14 年来药品招标对价格和市场集中的影响。

The impact of pharmaceutical tendering on prices and market concentration in South Africa over a 14-year period.

机构信息

London School of Economics and Political Science, UK; University of Cape Town, South Africa.

National Department of Health, Pretoria, South Africa.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jan;220:362-370. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.029. Epub 2018 Nov 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the South African tendering system for medicines to (a) evaluate its impact on prices and market concentration over a 14-year period and (b) analyze the accuracy of government forecasts of drug demand.

METHODS

We calculated Herfindahl-Hirschman indexes to measure market concentration levels based on all pharmaceutical tender contracts issued by the South African government between 2003 and 2016 (n = 8701). We estimated price indexes to track changes in medicine costs over this period. We compared prices set through tenders in the public health care system to the corresponding prices in the private system. We also analyzed government data on procurement in selected drug classes to assess the accuracy of demand forecasts.

FINDINGS

Between 2003 and 2016, the prices of medicines in most tender categories in the public health care system dropped by an average of around 40% or more. The prices of medicines procured for the public system through tenders were almost always lower than those sold in the private system. Tenders generally remained moderately to highly competitive over time (i.e., Herfindahl-Hirschman indexes < 2500), although the number of different firms winning contracts decreased in many categories. There were large discrepancies between the drug need estimates by the government and the quantities it went on to procure, with estimates off by more than 50% in most drug classes (9/16 observations).

CONCLUSION

Tendering may be an effective measure to lower drug costs. Because most tenders remained competitive over time, price decreases may be durable. South African government officials should monitor the availability and prices of medicines to ensure continued access to affordable medicines for patients, as it may be undermined by the decreasing number of firms winning contracts over time. Given the large discrepancy between forecasts and procurements, the government would benefit from improving the accuracy of its demand forecasts.

摘要

目的

我们调查了南非药品招标制度,(a)评估其在 14 年期间对价格和市场集中程度的影响,(b)分析政府对药品需求预测的准确性。

方法

我们根据南非政府在 2003 年至 2016 年期间发布的所有药品招标合同,计算了赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数,以衡量市场集中程度(n=8701)。我们估算了价格指数,以跟踪这段时间药品成本的变化。我们比较了公共医疗保健系统招标确定的价格与私人系统相应的价格。我们还分析了选定药物类别的采购政府数据,以评估需求预测的准确性。

结果

2003 年至 2016 年期间,公共医疗保健系统中大多数招标类别的药品价格平均下降了约 40%或更多。通过招标为公共系统采购的药品价格几乎总是低于私人系统销售的价格。随着时间的推移,招标通常保持适度到高度的竞争力(即赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数<2500),尽管许多类别中赢得合同的不同公司数量有所减少。政府的药物需求估计与实际采购数量之间存在较大差异,在大多数药物类别中,估计值相差超过 50%(9/16 个观测值)。

结论

招标可能是降低药品成本的有效措施。由于大多数招标随着时间的推移保持竞争,价格下降可能是持久的。南非政府官员应监测药品的供应和价格,以确保患者能够继续获得负担得起的药品,因为随着赢得合同的公司数量随着时间的推移而减少,这可能会受到影响。鉴于预测和采购之间存在较大差异,政府将受益于提高需求预测的准确性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验