• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南非单一出口价格政策对一篮子仿制药的影响,采用 1999 年至 2014 年的时间序列分析。

The impact of the single exit price policy on a basket of generic medicines in South Africa, using a time series analysis from 1999 to 2014.

机构信息

Discipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.

Faculty of Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jul 31;14(7):e0219690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219690. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0219690
PMID:31365534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6668780/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Regulating pharmaceutical markets have become a key strategy by most governments in ensuring the availability and accessibility of quality medicines to its citizens. The South African government, when faced with high medicine prices, implemented the Single Exit Price (SEP) in 2004. This study assessed the impact of the of the Single Exit Price (SEP) regulation introduced in South Africa in 2004 on a basket of generic.

METHOD

Private sector price data of a basket of medicines (December 1999 to December 2014) was obtained from various price files (Pharmacy Software Vendors and Community Pharmacy). The price of the medicine was expressed in a single unit dose. The medicines investigated used the WHO/HAI methodology. The Interrupted Time-Series (ITS) model was used to estimate the change in slope and level of medicines investigated (50 originator and its available generics) before and after the policy change.

RESULTS

Majority of the medicines analysed reflect a substantial decrease in medicine prices immediately after implementation of the pricing regulations as reflected in both the change in level and the change in slope using the interrupted time series analysis.

DISCUSSION

This study indicates that the SEP regulation had an impact on medicine pricing in South Africa in both the short (immediately on the introduction) and long term (over the study period). Most medicines investigated showed a smaller yearly increase in price compared to before regulations.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence of the impact of medicine pricing intervention from a middle-income country, and useful lessons can be drawn by other developing countries looking at introducing medicine price controls.

摘要

背景

规范药品市场已成为大多数政府的一项关键战略,旨在确保其公民能够获得和负担得起高质量的药品。南非政府在面对高昂的药品价格时,于 2004 年实施了单一出口价格(SEP)政策。本研究评估了南非 2004 年实施的单一出口价格(SEP)监管对一篮子仿制药的影响。

方法

从各种价格文件(药房软件供应商和社区药房)中获取一篮子药品(1999 年 12 月至 2014 年 12 月)的私营部门价格数据。药品的价格以单一剂量单位表示。所研究的药品采用世界卫生组织/卫生保健联盟(WHO/HAI)方法。使用中断时间序列(ITS)模型来估计政策变化前后所研究药品(50 种原研药及其可获得的仿制药)的斜率和水平变化。

结果

大多数分析的药品在定价法规实施后,价格都大幅下降,这在中断时间序列分析中反映在水平和斜率的变化上。

讨论

本研究表明,SEP 监管对南非的药品定价产生了短期(立即引入)和长期(研究期间)的影响。与监管前相比,大多数研究的药品价格每年的涨幅都较小。

结论

本研究提供了从中等收入国家实施药品定价干预的影响证据,其他考虑实施药品价格控制的发展中国家可以从中吸取有用的经验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7338/6668780/595b392bc649/pone.0219690.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7338/6668780/c010fb2aab9e/pone.0219690.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7338/6668780/702a6d8a15d4/pone.0219690.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7338/6668780/2df6b4713d9b/pone.0219690.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7338/6668780/c333909a3504/pone.0219690.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7338/6668780/5221e74e36c6/pone.0219690.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7338/6668780/595b392bc649/pone.0219690.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7338/6668780/c010fb2aab9e/pone.0219690.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7338/6668780/702a6d8a15d4/pone.0219690.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7338/6668780/2df6b4713d9b/pone.0219690.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7338/6668780/c333909a3504/pone.0219690.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7338/6668780/5221e74e36c6/pone.0219690.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7338/6668780/595b392bc649/pone.0219690.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of the single exit price policy on a basket of generic medicines in South Africa, using a time series analysis from 1999 to 2014.南非单一出口价格政策对一篮子仿制药的影响,采用 1999 年至 2014 年的时间序列分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 31;14(7):e0219690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219690. eCollection 2019.
2
Evaluating the impact of the single exit price policy on a basket of originator medicines in South Africa from 1999 to 2014 using a time series analysis.利用时间序列分析评估南非 1999 年至 2014 年单一出口价格政策对一篮子原研药品的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 16;19(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4403-8.
3
Pseudo-Generics in South Africa: A Price Comparison.南非的伪仿制药:价格比较
Value Health Reg Issues. 2019 Sep;19:87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
4
Evaluating the impact of single exit pricing (SEP) on medicine product withdrawal from the private healthcare market in South Africa.评估单一退出定价(SEP)对南非药品退出私营医疗市场的影响。
S Afr Med J. 2021 Apr 30;111(5):444-447. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i5.15297.
5
Access and Affordability of Medicines in Malaysia: Need for a National Pricing Policy.马来西亚的药品可及性和可负担性:需要国家定价政策。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Oct;17(5):641-654. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00480-9.
6
The impact of generics and generic reference pricing on candesartan and rosuvastatin utilisation, price and expenditure in South Africa.仿制药及仿制药参考定价对南非坎地沙坦和瑞舒伐他汀的使用、价格及支出的影响。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Feb;41(1):81-87. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0758-x. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
7
Impact of the introduction of mandatory generic substitution in South Africa: private sector sales of generic and originator medicines for chronic diseases.南非引入强制仿制药替代的影响:慢性病仿制药和原研药的私营部门销售情况
Trop Med Int Health. 2016 Dec;21(12):1504-1512. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12785. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
8
Switching from originator brand medicines to generic equivalents in selected developing countries: how much could be saved?在选定的发展中国家中,将品牌原研药转换为通用等效药物:可以节省多少费用?
Value Health. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(5):664-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
9
Impact of European pharmaceutical price regulation on generic price competition: a review.欧洲药品价格管制对仿制药价格竞争的影响:综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(8):649-63. doi: 10.2165/11535360-000000000-00000.
10
Assessing the prices and affordability of oncology medicines for three common cancers within the private sector of South Africa.评估南非私营部门三种常见癌症的肿瘤药物价格和可负担性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 6;21(1):661. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06627-6.

引用本文的文献

1
On paper; in practice: measuring compliance with official pricing policies in a large field study of essential medicines in Indonesia.理论上;实践中:在印度尼西亚一项关于基本药物的大型实地研究中衡量对官方定价政策的遵守情况。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025 Jul 2;18(1):2521434. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2025.2521434. eCollection 2025.
2
Effects of transparent online open procurement on prices, volumes, and costs of medicines: an interrupted time series study in Ningxia, China.透明在线公开采购对药品价格、数量和成本的影响:中国宁夏的一项中断时间序列研究
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Aug 20;15:1362374. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1362374. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Defining and Measuring the Affordability of New Medicines: A Systematic Review.定义和衡量新药的可负担性:系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Aug;35(8):777-791. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0514-4.
2
Price comparison of high-cost originator medicines in European countries.欧洲国家高成本原研药的价格比较。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Apr;17(2):221-230. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2016.1223543. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
3
Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial.中断时间序列回归在公共卫生干预措施评价中的应用:教程。
Implementation of Medicines Pricing Policies in Ghana: The Interplay of Policy Content, Actors' Participation, and Context.
加纳药品定价政策的实施:政策内容、行为者参与和背景的相互作用
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7994. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7994. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
4
Pharmaco-disparities in heart failure: a survey of the affordability of guideline recommended therapy in 10 countries.心力衰竭中的药物治疗差异:对10个国家指南推荐治疗的可负担性调查
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Oct;10(5):3152-3163. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14468. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
5
Implementation of medicines pricing policies in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review.撒哈拉以南非洲药品定价政策的实施:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 1;11(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02114-z.
6
Evidence on the effectiveness of policies promoting price transparency - A systematic review.关于促进价格透明度政策有效性的证据——系统评价。
Health Policy. 2023 Aug;134:104681. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
7
A Human Rights Case Study on Access to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for Female Sex Workers in South Africa.南非女性性工作者获得暴露前预防措施的人权案例研究。
Health Hum Rights. 2022 Jun;24(1):105-115.
8
Powers, engagements and resultant influences over the design and implementation of medicine pricing policies in Ghana.加纳药品定价政策的设计和实施中的权力、参与方及其影响因素。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 May;7(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008225.
9
Essential Medicines in Universal Health Coverage: A Scoping Review of Public Health Law Interventions and How They Are Measured in Five Middle-Income Countries.全民健康覆盖中的基本药物:五项中等收入国家公共卫生法干预措施及其衡量方法的范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 18;17(24):9524. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249524.
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):348-355. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw098.
4
Canada's New Generic Pricing Policy: A Reasoned Approach to a Challenging Problem.加拿大新的仿制药定价政策:应对棘手问题的合理方法。
Healthc Policy. 2015 Aug;11(1):10-4.
5
The experiences of implementing generic medicine policy in eight countries: A review and recommendations for a successful promotion of generic medicine use.八个国家实施仿制药政策的经验:促进仿制药使用成功推广的综述与建议
Saudi Pharm J. 2014 Dec;22(6):491-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2013.12.017. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
6
Generic medicine substitution: a cross-sectional survey of the perception of pharmacists in North-Central, Nigeria.仿制药替代:尼日利亚中北部药剂师认知的横断面调查。
Med Princ Pract. 2014;23(1):53-8. doi: 10.1159/000355473. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
7
Pharmaceutical policies in European countries in response to the global financial crisis.欧洲国家应对全球金融危机的药品政策。
South Med Rev. 2011 Dec;4(2):69-79. doi: 10.5655/smr.v4i2.1004. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
8
Switching from originator brand medicines to generic equivalents in selected developing countries: how much could be saved?在选定的发展中国家中,将品牌原研药转换为通用等效药物:可以节省多少费用?
Value Health. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(5):664-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
9
The impact of repeated cost containment policies on pharmaceutical expenditure: experience in Spain.重复的成本控制政策对药品支出的影响:西班牙的经验。
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Dec;12(6):563-73. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0271-1. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
10
Medicine prices, availability, and affordability in 36 developing and middle-income countries: a secondary analysis.36个发展中国家和中等收入国家的药品价格、可及性及可负担性:一项二次分析
Lancet. 2009 Jan 17;373(9659):240-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61762-6. Epub 2008 Nov 29.