• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区对“我死前想要的东西”的看法。

Community Views on 'What I Want 'Before I Die'.

作者信息

Rawlings Deb, Miller-Lewis Lauren, Tieman Jennifer

机构信息

Palliative Care, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2018 Nov 30;8(12):111. doi: 10.3390/bs8120111.

DOI:10.3390/bs8120111
PMID:30513633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6315805/
Abstract

Few previous studies have formally examined people's wishes regarding what they want to do before they die. This study aimed to describe responses to an activity within a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) where people considered what was important when faced with their own mortality. We asked participants to complete the following: "Before I Die, I want to…". The content of participants' responses ( = 633) was analysed qualitatively with a coding schema developed and then applied. All authors independently coded the first 100 "Before I Die" statements, followed by a second round of coding where themes were verified and confirmed. Following this, two independent raters coded all 633 responses, obtaining 95.24% agreement (Cohen's Kappa = 0.789, < 0.0005). Twelve themes emerged from the data: family; do an activity; personal aspiration; live life fully, happiness; love; the greater good; peace; legacy; gratitude; religion; and health. Responses could also be distinguished as being inward-facing (about the self), and outward-facing (about others). Reflecting on what is important and on what a person wishes to achieve or address before they die can be seen as a companion process to advance care planning which addresses what an individual wants to plan to manage their actual death.

摘要

以往很少有研究正式调查人们对于死前想做之事的意愿。本研究旨在描述大规模在线开放课程(MOOC)中一项活动的反馈情况,在该活动中人们思考面对自身死亡时什么是重要的。我们要求参与者完成以下内容:“在我死前,我想……”。对参与者的回答内容(n = 633)采用自行制定并应用的编码方案进行定性分析。所有作者独立对前100条“在我死前”的陈述进行编码,随后进行第二轮编码以验证和确认主题。在此之后,两名独立评分者对所有633条回答进行编码,一致性达到95.24%(科恩kappa系数 = 0.789,p < 0.0005)。数据中出现了12个主题:家庭;进行一项活动;个人抱负;充分生活、幸福;爱;更大的利益;安宁;遗产;感恩;宗教;以及健康。回答也可分为关注自身内在(关于自我)和关注他人外在(关于他人)两类。思考死前重要之事以及个人希望实现或处理之事,可被视为推进照护计划的一个伴随过程,照护计划关注的是个人希望如何规划应对自己的实际死亡。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c118/6315805/317c97815a06/behavsci-08-00111-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c118/6315805/317c97815a06/behavsci-08-00111-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c118/6315805/317c97815a06/behavsci-08-00111-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Community Views on 'What I Want 'Before I Die'.社区对“我死前想要的东西”的看法。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2018 Nov 30;8(12):111. doi: 10.3390/bs8120111.
2
"I want to die in my sleep"-how people think about death, choice, and control: findings from a Massive Open Online Course.“我想在睡梦中死去”——人们对死亡、选择和掌控的看法:来自大规模在线开放课程的研究结果
Ann Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;8(4):411-419. doi: 10.21037/apm.2019.03.07. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
3
The contribution of a MOOC to community discussions around death and dying.慕课对围绕死亡展开的社区讨论的贡献。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Feb 20;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0287-3.
4
Why do we want the right to die? A systematic review of the international literature on the views of patients, carers and the public on assisted dying.我们为什么想要死亡的权利?对国际文献中关于患者、护理人员和公众对协助死亡的看法的系统综述。
Palliat Med. 2013 Jan;27(1):13-26. doi: 10.1177/0269216312463623. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
5
OA6 Talking about death won't kill you; introducing die-alogues.OA6 谈论死亡不会害死你;引入死亡对话。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015 Apr;5 Suppl 1:A2. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000906.6.
6
Cyberincivility in the Massive Open Online Course Learning Environment: Data-Mining Study.大规模在线开放课程学习环境中的网络不文明行为:数据挖掘研究
JMIR Med Educ. 2018 Dec 21;4(2):e12152. doi: 10.2196/12152.
7
Maintaining integrity in the face of death: a grounded theory to explain the perspectives of people affected by lung cancer about the expression of wishes for end of life care.面对死亡时保持完整:一个扎根理论,用以解释肺癌患者对生命终末期护理意愿表达的观点。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Jun;49(6):718-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.12.003. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
8
Wishes regarding the use of life-sustaining treatments among elderly persons in Israel: an explanatory model.
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Dec;45(11):1715-27. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00104-4.
9
Managing 'shades of grey': a focus group study exploring community-dwellers' views on advance care planning in older people.应对“灰色地带”:一项焦点小组研究,探讨社区居民对老年人预先护理计划的看法。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Jan 13;16(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0175-7.
10
PA20 Views on talking about death, dying and loss.PA20:关于谈论死亡、濒死和丧失的观点。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015 Apr;5 Suppl 1:A25. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000906.80.

引用本文的文献

1
What are the personal last wishes of people with a life-limiting illness? Findings from a longitudinal observational study in specialist palliative care.患有绝症的人的个人遗愿是什么?一项在专科姑息治疗中进行的纵向观察研究的结果。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Mar 22;21(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00928-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing compassionate communities in Australia through collective caregiving: a qualitative study exploring network-centred care and the role of the end of life sector.通过集体照护在澳大利亚发展富有同情心的社区:一项探索以网络为中心的照护及临终关怀部门作用的定性研究
Ann Palliat Med. 2018 Apr;7(Suppl 2):S42-S51. doi: 10.21037/apm.2018.03.14.
2
The contribution of a MOOC to community discussions around death and dying.慕课对围绕死亡展开的社区讨论的贡献。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Feb 20;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0287-3.
3
Common Items on a Bucket List.
常见的遗愿清单项目。
J Palliat Med. 2018 May;21(5):652-658. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0512. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
4
What is grounded theory?什么是扎根理论?
Evid Based Nurs. 2016 Apr;19(2):34-5. doi: 10.1136/eb-2016-102306. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
5
So, You Want to Make Your Bucket List? Where and When to Start.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Nov;136(5):1129-1131. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001719.
6
Self-focused attention and emotional reactivity: the role of culture.自我聚焦注意力和情绪反应性:文化的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Mar;98(3):507-519. doi: 10.1037/a0018534.
7
Axial coding and the grounded theory controversy.轴心编码与扎根理论争议。
West J Nurs Res. 1999 Dec;21(6):743-57. doi: 10.1177/019394599902100603.
8
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.分类数据观察者一致性的测量。
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74.