• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮质基底节综合征中同理心能力下降及其对照顾者负担的影响。

Reduced capacity for empathy in corticobasal syndrome and its impact on carer burden.

机构信息

School of Medical Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

School of Psychology, The University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;34(3):497-503. doi: 10.1002/gps.5045. Epub 2018 Dec 27.

DOI:10.1002/gps.5045
PMID:30520157
Abstract

Corticobasal syndrome (CBS) is clinically characterised by a wide range of motor, cognitive, and behavioural features but remains challenging to diagnose accurately. Despite recent evidence supporting the presence of social cognition and emotion processing disturbances, few studies have explored the nature of empathic ability in CBS. This study aimed to (a) investigate the extent to which cognitive and affective dimensions of empathy are affected in CBS and (b) to determine the impact of such changes on carer burden. Empathic capacity was assessed in 29 CBS patients and 28 matched healthy controls. We employed the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), an instrument measuring: (a) perspective taking, (b) fantasy, (c) empathic concern, and (d) personal distress. A significant change in both perspective taking and empathic concern was observed in CBS following disease onset. Furthermore, affective empathy deficits in CBS patients predicted higher levels of carer burden. Disturbances in both cognitive and affective empathy are present in CBS and lead to increased levels of carer burden.

摘要

皮质基底节综合征(CBS)在临床上表现为广泛的运动、认知和行为特征,但仍难以准确诊断。尽管最近有证据支持社交认知和情绪处理障碍的存在,但很少有研究探讨 CBS 患者的同理心能力本质。本研究旨在:(a) 调查 CBS 患者同理心的认知和情感维度受到多大程度的影响;(b) 确定这些变化对照顾者负担的影响。同理心能力在 29 名 CBS 患者和 28 名匹配的健康对照组中进行了评估。我们采用了人际反应指数(IRI),该工具测量:(a) 观点采择,(b) 幻想,(c) 同理心关怀,和 (d) 个人痛苦。在 CBS 发病后,观察到患者的观点采择和同理心关怀均发生了显著变化。此外,CBS 患者的情感同理心缺陷预测了更高水平的照顾者负担。CBS 患者存在认知和情感同理心障碍,导致照顾者负担增加。

相似文献

1
Reduced capacity for empathy in corticobasal syndrome and its impact on carer burden.皮质基底节综合征中同理心能力下降及其对照顾者负担的影响。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;34(3):497-503. doi: 10.1002/gps.5045. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
2
When one loses empathy: its effect on carers of patients with dementia.当一个人失去同理心时:它对痴呆症患者照顾者的影响。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2013 Sep;26(3):174-84. doi: 10.1177/0891988713495448. Epub 2013 Jul 14.
3
Self-reported empathic abilities in schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者自我报告的共情能力
Schizophr Res. 2007 May;92(1-3):85-9. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.01.024. Epub 2007 Mar 9.
4
The Role of Cognitive and Affective Empathy in Spouses' Support Interactions: An Observational Study.认知共情和情感共情在配偶支持互动中的作用:一项观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 24;11(2):e0149944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149944. eCollection 2016.
5
Empathy, Emotion Recognition, and Paranoia in the General Population.普通人群中的同理心、情绪识别与偏执狂
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 24;13:804178. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.804178. eCollection 2022.
6
Self-reported empathy deficits are uniquely associated with poor functioning in schizophrenia.自我报告的同理心缺陷与精神分裂症的功能不良具有独特的相关性。
Schizophr Res. 2012 May;137(1-3):196-202. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.01.012. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
7
Empathy in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index.精神分裂症中的同理心:人际反应指数的荟萃分析。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Mar;249:293-303. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.12.033. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
8
Impaired empathic abilities and reduced white matter integrity in schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者共情能力受损和白质完整性降低。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Jan 3;48:117-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.09.018. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
9
Feeling for the Other With Ease: Prospective Actors Show High Levels of Emotion Recognition and Report Above Average Empathic Concern, but Do Not Experience Strong Distress.轻松感受他人:准演员表现出高水平的情绪识别能力,且报告的共情关注高于平均水平,但不会体验到强烈的痛苦。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 1;12:543846. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.543846. eCollection 2021.
10
Neural correlates of empathy in mild cognitive impairment.轻度认知障碍患者共情的神经相关因素。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Feb;24(1):171-183. doi: 10.3758/s13415-023-01146-9. Epub 2023 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Empathy and Psychological Outcomes in Informal Caregivers of Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.社区居住老年人非正式照料者的同理心与心理结果:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2025 May 8;80(6). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaf018.
2
Grey-matter correlates of empathy in 4-Repeat Tauopathies.4R Tau 蛋白病中同理心的灰质关联
NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2023 Sep 27;9(1):138. doi: 10.1038/s41531-023-00576-z.
3
Neurological update: the palliative care landscape for atypical parkinsonian syndromes.
神经学最新进展:非典型帕金森综合征的姑息治疗概况
J Neurol. 2023 Apr;270(4):2333-2341. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11574-9. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
4
The Cognitive Profile of Atypical Parkinsonism: A Meta-Analysis.非典型帕金森病的认知特征:一项荟萃分析。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2023 Jun;33(2):514-543. doi: 10.1007/s11065-022-09551-6. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
5
Social cognition in the FTLD spectrum: evidence from MRI.额颞叶变性谱系障碍中的社会认知:来自磁共振成像的证据
J Neurol. 2022 Apr;269(4):2245-2258. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10892-0. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
6
Measuring social cognition in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a clinical approach.额颞叶变性中社会认知的测量:一种临床方法。
J Neurol. 2022 Apr;269(4):2227-2244. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10889-9. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
7
Caregiver strain in progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal syndromes.进行性核上性麻痹和皮质基底节综合征中的照料者负担
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2021 Oct;128(10):1611-1621. doi: 10.1007/s00702-021-02379-z. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
8
Impairment of intermediate somatosensory function in corticobasal syndrome.皮质基底节综合征中间体感功能障碍。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 7;10(1):11155. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67991-7.
9
Comparing two facets of emotion perception across multiple neurodegenerative diseases.比较多种神经退行性疾病中情绪感知的两个方面。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020 Jul 1;15(5):511-522. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa060.