• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者在系统重新设计中的声音:以重新设计一个集中系统为例,该系统用于从初级保健到风湿病学家处接收疑似类风湿关节炎患者的转诊。

The voice of patients in system redesign: A case study of redesigning a centralized system for intake of referrals from primary care to rheumatologists for patients with suspected rheumatoid arthritis.

机构信息

Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):348-363. doi: 10.1111/hex.12855. Epub 2018 Dec 5.

DOI:10.1111/hex.12855
PMID:30520175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6543166/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The published literature demands examples of health-care systems designed with the active engagement of patients to explore the application of this complex phenomenon in practice.

METHODS

This case study explored how the voice of patients was incorporated into the process of redesigning an element of the health-care system, a centralized system for intake of referrals from primary care to rheumatologists for patients with suspected rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-centralized intake. The phenomenon of patient engagement using "patient and community engagement researchers" (PaCERs) in research and the process of redesigning centralized intake were selected as the case. In-depth evaluation of the case was undertaken through the triangulation of findings from the document review and participants' reflection on the case.

RESULTS

In this case, patients and PaCERs participated in multiple activities including an initial meeting of key stakeholders to develop the project vision; a patient-to-patient PaCERs study to gather perspectives of patients with RA on the challenges they face in accessing and navigating the health-care system, and what they see as key elements of an effective system that would be responsive to their needs; the development of an evaluation framework for future centralized intake; and the choice of candidate centralized intake strategies to be evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

The described feasible multistep approach to active patient engagement in health-care system redesign contributes to an understanding of the application of this complex phenomenon in practice. Therefore, the manuscript serves as one more step towards a patient-centred health-care system that is redesigned with active patient engagement.

摘要

背景

已发表的文献需要有患者积极参与设计的医疗保健系统的实例,以探索这一复杂现象在实践中的应用。

方法

本案例研究探讨了如何将患者的声音纳入医疗保健系统设计的一个元素的过程,即针对疑似类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的从初级保健到风湿病学家转诊的集中式系统——集中式入组。选择使用“患者和社区参与研究人员”(PaCERs)进行研究和重新设计集中式入组的过程中的患者参与现象作为案例。通过对文献回顾和参与者对案例的反思的研究结果进行三角分析,对案例进行了深入评估。

结果

在这个案例中,患者和 PaCERs 参与了多项活动,包括:召开主要利益攸关方会议,制定项目愿景;开展 PaCERs 患者对患者研究,收集 RA 患者在获取和使用医疗保健系统方面面临的挑战的观点,以及他们认为有效的系统的关键要素是什么,该系统将对他们的需求做出响应;制定未来集中式入组的评估框架;选择候选集中式入组策略进行评估。

结论

所描述的积极参与医疗保健系统重新设计的多步骤可行方法有助于理解这一复杂现象在实践中的应用。因此,本文为以患者为中心的医疗保健系统的重新设计提供了更多的实践经验,其中积极参与了患者。

相似文献

1
The voice of patients in system redesign: A case study of redesigning a centralized system for intake of referrals from primary care to rheumatologists for patients with suspected rheumatoid arthritis.患者在系统重新设计中的声音:以重新设计一个集中系统为例,该系统用于从初级保健到风湿病学家处接收疑似类风湿关节炎患者的转诊。
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):348-363. doi: 10.1111/hex.12855. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
2
Optimizing the interprofessional workforce for centralized intake of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid disease: case study.优化跨专业医疗团队以实现骨关节炎和类风湿病患者的集中收治:案例研究
Hum Resour Health. 2015 May 28;13:41. doi: 10.1186/s12960-015-0033-3.
3
Group cognitive-behavioural programme to reduce the impact of rheumatoid arthritis fatigue: the RAFT RCT with economic and qualitative evaluations.群组认知行为方案对减轻类风湿关节炎疲劳的影响:RAFT RCT 伴有经济和定性评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(57):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta23570.
4
Development of key performance indicators to evaluate centralized intake for patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.制定关键绩效指标以评估骨关节炎和类风湿关节炎患者的集中收治情况。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Nov 14;17:322. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0843-7.
5
Triage of Rheumatology Referrals Facilitates Wait Time Benchmarks.风湿病转诊的分诊有助于设定等待时间基准。
J Rheumatol. 2016 Nov;43(11):2064-2067. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.151235. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
6
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
7
Remodeling a rheumatology practice to facilitate early referral.重塑风湿病诊疗流程以促进早期转诊。
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2005 Nov;31(4):591-604. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2005.07.005.
8
Development of a framework for reporting health service models for managing rheumatoid arthritis.制定报告用于管理类风湿性关节炎的卫生服务模式的框架。
Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Feb;29(2):151-65. doi: 10.1007/s10067-009-1298-5. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
9
Do primary care physicians have a place in the management of rheumatoid arthritis?初级保健医生在类风湿性关节炎的管理中占有一席之地吗?
Joint Bone Spine. 2004 May;71(3):190-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2003.09.003.
10
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of the re-engineered discharge (RED) care model in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.再工程化出院(RED)护理模式在类风湿关节炎患者中的效果。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 25;103(43):e39722. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039722.
2
Candidacy 2.0 (CC) - an enhanced theory of access to healthcare for chronic conditions: lessons from a critical interpretive synthesis on access to rheumatoid arthritis care.候选方案 2.0 (CC) - 一种增强的慢性疾病获得医疗保健的理论:通过对类风湿关节炎护理获得途径的批判性综合分析得到的启示。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 26;24(1):986. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11438-6.
3
Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
A categorisation of problems and solutions to improve patient referrals from primary to specialty care.改善患者从基层医疗转诊至专科医疗的问题与解决方案分类。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 20;18(1):986. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3745-y.
2
How to practice person-centred care: A conceptual framework.如何实践以患者为中心的护理:概念框架。
Health Expect. 2018 Apr;21(2):429-440. doi: 10.1111/hex.12640. Epub 2017 Nov 19.
3
Single-entry models (SEMs) for scheduled services: Towards a roadmap for the implementation of recommended practices.
基层医疗中的类风湿关节炎管理:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 May 22;21(6):662. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21060662.
4
Challenges and promising solutions to engaging patients in healthcare implementation in the United States: an environmental scan.参与美国医疗保健实施的患者面临的挑战和有前景的解决方案:环境扫描。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 4;24(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10315-y.
5
Towards conceptualizing patients as partners in health systems: a systematic review and descriptive synthesis.将患者概念化为卫生系统的合作伙伴:系统评价和描述性综合。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jan 25;21(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00954-8.
6
Patient and public involvement in an international rheumatology translational research project: an evaluation.患者和公众参与一项国际风湿病转化研究项目:一项评估
BMC Rheumatol. 2022 Oct 22;6(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s41927-022-00311-w.
7
Development of an interdisciplinary early rheumatoid arthritis care pathway.跨学科早期类风湿性关节炎护理路径的开发。
BMC Rheumatol. 2022 Jun 25;6(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s41927-022-00267-x.
8
Evaluating health service outcomes of public involvement in health service design in high-income countries: a systematic review.评估高收入国家公众参与卫生服务设计的卫生服务成果:一项系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 20;21(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06319-1.
9
Patient experiences of the urgent cancer referral pathway-Can the NHS do better? Semi-structured interviews with patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer.患者对上消化道癌症的紧急癌症转诊途径的体验-国民保健制度(NHS)能否做得更好?对上消化道癌症患者的半结构化访谈。
Health Expect. 2020 Dec;23(6):1512-1522. doi: 10.1111/hex.13136. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
10
Co-design of a patient experience survey for arthritis central intake: an example of meaningful patient engagement in healthcare design.关节炎中心接待患者体验调查问卷的共同设计:患者有意义地参与医疗保健设计的一个实例。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 4;19(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4196-9.
定期服务的单入口模型(SEM):迈向实施推荐做法的路线图。
Health Policy. 2017 Sep;121(9):963-970. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
4
"Part of the Team": Mapping the outcomes of training patients for new roles in health research and planning."团队的一部分":为健康研究和规划中的新角色培训患者的结果映射。
Health Expect. 2017 Dec;20(6):1428-1436. doi: 10.1111/hex.12591. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
5
What is the influence of single-entry models on access to elective surgical procedures? A systematic review.单项入径模式对择期外科手术可及性有何影响?一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 24;7(2):e012225. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012225.
6
Patient involvement in rheumatology outpatient service design and delivery: a case study.患者参与风湿病门诊服务的设计与提供:一项案例研究。
Health Expect. 2017 Jun;20(3):508-518. doi: 10.1111/hex.12478. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
7
Improving Appropriate Access to Care With Central Referral and Triage in Rheumatology.通过风湿病学的中央转诊和分诊改善适当的医疗服务可及性。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Oct;68(10):1547-53. doi: 10.1002/acr.22845. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
8
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force.用于医疗保健决策的多标准决策分析——简介:ISPOR多标准决策分析新兴良好实践工作组报告1
Value Health. 2016 Jan;19(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.003. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
9
Experience-based co-design in an adult psychological therapies service.成人心理治疗服务中的体验式协同设计
J Ment Health. 2016;25(1):36-40. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2015.1101423. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
10
Development of key performance indicators to evaluate centralized intake for patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.制定关键绩效指标以评估骨关节炎和类风湿关节炎患者的集中收治情况。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Nov 14;17:322. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0843-7.