Suppr超能文献

四种商业 IgG-酶联免疫吸附测定法检测蜱传脑炎病毒抗体的比较。

Comparison of Four Commercial IgG-Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for the Detection of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Antibodies.

机构信息

1 Spiez Laboratory, Federal Office for Civil Protection, Spiez, Switzerland.

2 Swiss National Reference Centre for Tick-Transmitted Diseases, Spiez, Switzerland.

出版信息

Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2019 May;19(5):358-364. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2018.2359. Epub 2018 Dec 4.

Abstract

Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is the most important arboviral disease in many parts of Europe and Asia. Both the diagnosis of TBE as well as the conduction of surveillance studies are based on the demonstration of specific antibodies. For reasons of simplicity, automatization, and quick availability of test results, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are the method of choice for anti-TBE virus antibody detection. In this study, we evaluated four commercial IgG-ELISAs using 876 epidemiological plasma samples: the Enzygnost Anti-TBE/FSME Virus IgG assay (Siemens; assay 1), the Anti-FSME/TBE Virus ELISA (IgG) assay (Euroimmun; assay 2), the Anti-FSME/TBE Virus ELISA "Vienna" (IgG) assay (Euroimmun; assay 3), and the RIDASCREEN FSME/TBE IgG EIA assay (R-Biopharm; assay 4). In total, discrepant results were observed for 37.2% of all samples. The evaluated assays significantly differed in qualitative data ( < 0.0001, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test) and showed Spearman's rank correlation coefficients ranging between 0.88 and 0.97 for quantitative data. The degree of disagreement between the different assays was exceptionally high for samples originating from blood donors with vaccination against TBE virus. For this sample group, the proportion of positive results was considerably higher for assay 3 (52.7%) and assay 4 (57%) than for assay 1 (7.5%) and assay 2 (6.4%), respectively, indicating that assays 1 and 2 are less suitable for the detection of vaccination antibodies than assays 3 and 4. Indirect immunofluorescence testing data available for a subset of samples ( = 238) mostly originating from nonflavivirus-vaccinated blood donors ( = 234) revealed problems in both sensitivity and specificity of the evaluated assays; whereas sensitivity issues were most prominent for the Euroimmun assay, specificity concerns were most pronounced for the Euroimmun Vienna and the RIDASCREEN assays.

摘要

在许多欧洲和亚洲地区,蜱传脑炎(TBE)是最重要的虫媒病毒病。TBE 的诊断和监测研究都基于特定抗体的检测。出于简单性、自动化和快速获得检测结果的原因,酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)是检测抗 TBE 病毒抗体的首选方法。在这项研究中,我们使用 876 份流行病学血浆样本评估了四种商业 IgG-ELISA:Enzygnost Anti-TBE/FSME Virus IgG 检测试剂盒(西门子;检测 1)、Anti-FSME/TBE Virus ELISA(IgG)检测试剂盒(欧蒙;检测 2)、Anti-FSME/TBE Virus ELISA“维也纳”(IgG)检测试剂盒(欧蒙;检测 3)和 RIDASCREEN FSME/TBE IgG EIA 检测试剂盒(R-Biopharm;检测 4)。总的来说,所有样本中有 37.2%的结果存在差异。评估的检测方法在定性数据上(<0.0001,Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel 检验)显著不同,并且在定量数据上显示 Spearman 等级相关系数在 0.88 到 0.97 之间。对于来自 TBE 病毒疫苗接种献血者的样本,不同检测方法之间的不一致程度非常高。对于该样本组,检测 3(52.7%)和检测 4(57%)的阳性结果比例明显高于检测 1(7.5%)和检测 2(6.4%),表明检测 1 和 2 不太适合检测疫苗抗体,而检测 3 和 4 则更适合。对于一小部分样本(n=238),可以获得间接免疫荧光检测数据,这些样本主要来自未接种黄病毒疫苗的献血者(n=234),结果显示评估的检测方法在敏感性和特异性方面都存在问题;虽然 Euroimmun 检测方法的敏感性问题最为突出,但 Euroimmun Vienna 和 RIDASCREEN 检测方法的特异性问题最为明显。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验