Suppr超能文献

比较预先使用布托啡诺或安乃近与氯胺酮+美托咪定及S-氯胺酮+美托咪定麻醉对改善小鼠术中镇痛效果的影响。

Comparison of pre-emptive butorphanol or metamizole with ketamine +medetomidine and s-ketamine + medetomidine anaesthesia in improving intraoperative analgesia in mice.

作者信息

Bauer C, Schillinger U, Brandl J, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Ott A, Baumgartner C

机构信息

Centre of Preclinical Research, Technical University of Munich, Germany.

Clinic for Small Animal Surgery and Reproduction, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Lab Anim. 2019 Oct;53(5):459-469. doi: 10.1177/0023677218815208. Epub 2018 Dec 8.

Abstract

In accordance with the 'refinement' component of the 3Rs, the primary aim of this study was to investigate and compare ketamine + medetomidine (KM) and s-ketamine + medetomidine (SKM) anaesthetic protocols in C57BL/6J mice (both sexes). We sought to determine whether s-ketamine could provide adequate surgical tolerance at a 50% dose relative to that of ketamine racemate and whether antagonism of medetomidine could be initiated 15 min earlier. The second aim was to investigate the potential improvement in analgesia for both anaesthetic protocols by adding butorphanol or metamizole. Analgesia was tested via the pedal withdrawal reaction (PWR) to a painful stimulus. During anaesthesia, respiratory frequency, pulse oximetry, body temperature and PWR were monitored. Among the 16 mice in each group, the PWR was lost in all the KM + metamizole (35:56 ± 6:07 min), KM + butorphanol (43:45 ± 2:14 min) and SKM + butorphanol (24:03 ± 5:50 min) mice, 15 of the non-premedicated KM (37:00 ± 8:11 min) mice, and 9 of the pure SKM (20:00 ± 4:19 min) mice; the latter group increased to 11 mice (17:16 ± 5:10 min) with premedication of metamizole. In contrast to the racemic combination, s-ketamine at the dose used here did not lead to sufficient loss of the PWR. However, earlier partial antagonism of SKM resulted in a slightly shorter and qualitatively better recovery than later partial antagonism of SKM. The addition of metamizole or butorphanol to KM or SKM anaesthesia positively influences the analgesic quality. However, when butorphanol is added, controlled ventilation may be necessary, especially for male mice.

摘要

根据3R原则中的“优化”部分,本研究的主要目的是研究和比较氯胺酮+美托咪定(KM)和S-氯胺酮+美托咪定(SKM)麻醉方案对C57BL/6J小鼠(雌雄均有)的效果。我们试图确定S-氯胺酮相对于消旋氯胺酮在50%剂量时是否能提供足够的手术耐受性,以及美托咪定的拮抗作用是否可以提前15分钟开始。第二个目的是研究通过添加布托啡诺或安乃近对两种麻醉方案的镇痛效果是否有潜在改善。通过对疼痛刺激的足趾退缩反应(PWR)来测试镇痛效果。在麻醉期间,监测呼吸频率、脉搏血氧饱和度、体温和PWR。每组16只小鼠中,所有KM+安乃近(35:56±6:07分钟)、KM+布托啡诺(43:45±2:14分钟)和SKM+布托啡诺(24:03±5:50分钟)组的小鼠,15只未用术前药的KM组(37:00±8:11分钟)小鼠,以及9只纯SKM组(20:00±4:19分钟)小鼠的PWR消失;后者在使用安乃近进行术前药预处理后,PWR消失小鼠增加到11只(17:16±5:10分钟)。与消旋组合相比,此处使用的剂量的S-氯胺酮并未导致PWR充分消失。然而,SKM的早期部分拮抗作用导致恢复时间略短且质量上更好,优于SKM的后期部分拮抗作用。在KM或SKM麻醉中添加安乃近或布托啡诺对镇痛质量有积极影响。然而,当添加布托啡诺时,可能需要控制通气,尤其是对雄性小鼠。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验