Suppr超能文献

评价一种用于高度可控性心脏缺血再灌注模型的小鼠全身麻醉方案。

Evaluation of general anesthesia protocols for a highly controlled cardiac ischemia-reperfusion model in mice.

机构信息

Université-Lyon, CarMeN Laboratory, Inserm U1060, INRA U1397, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Bron, France.

Département de Cardiologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier EST, IHU-OPERA Bâtiment B13, Bron, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Oct 25;19(10):e0309799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309799. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to test different anesthetic mixtures in order to identify the most suitable one for a surgical cardiac ischemia-reperfusion model in mice.

METHODS

  1. Sixty four mice were submitted to one of the 6 combinations of ketamine or alfaxalone associated to xylazine, medetomidine or midazolam. Depth and quality of anesthesia were evaluated via 5 reflex scores. 2) Impact of analgesic (buprenorphine or butorphanol), anesthesia reversal (with atipamezole) and surgery (cardiac ischemia-reperfusion surgery) have been tested in the selected protocols. 3) infarction size has been measured with TTC (Triphenyl Tetrazolium Chloride) method in mice anesthetized with best protocols.

RESULTS

Protocol involving medetomidine induced the longest surgical anesthesia: (median = 120, {interquartile range = 100-125}) min with ketamine and 53 {25-100} min with alfaxalone. Butorphanol substitution with buprenorphine did not alter time-related anesthesia parameters. Atipamezole reversal considerably reduced both recovery and immobilization time (respectively 22 {18-30} min and 98 {88-99} min vs. 55 {40-70} min and 143 {131-149} min, in groups with no reversal, p = 0.001) with no impact on infarction size measurement.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the combination alfaxalone/medetomidine/buprenorphine (80/0,3/0,075 mg.kg-1, s.c.) associated with reversal by atipamezole was a reliable anesthetic protocol for murine surgery, particularly for the study of ischemia-reperfusion.

摘要

背景

我们的研究目的是测试不同的麻醉混合物,以确定最适合用于小鼠心脏缺血再灌注模型的一种。

方法

1)将 64 只小鼠分为 6 组,每组分别接受氯胺酮或阿法沙龙与二甲噻嗪、美托咪定或咪达唑仑中的一种组合。通过 5 个反射评分评估麻醉深度和质量。2)在选定的方案中测试了镇痛(丁丙诺啡或布托啡诺)、麻醉逆转(用阿替美唑)和手术(心脏缺血再灌注手术)的影响。3)用 TTC(三苯基氯化四唑)法测量最佳方案麻醉下小鼠的梗死面积。

结果

涉及美托咪定的方案诱导的手术麻醉时间最长:(中位数=120,{四分位距=100-125})min 用氯胺酮和 53 {25-100} min 用阿法沙龙。丁丙诺啡替代布托啡诺不会改变与麻醉时间相关的参数。阿替美唑逆转显著缩短了恢复和固定时间(分别为 22 {18-30} min 和 98 {88-99} min 与 55 {40-70} min 和 143 {131-149} min,无逆转组,p=0.001),对梗死面积测量无影响。

结论

在这项研究中,阿法沙龙/美托咪定/布托啡诺(80/0.3/0.075 mg.kg-1,s.c.)联合阿替美唑逆转是一种可靠的小鼠手术麻醉方案,特别是缺血再灌注的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9a8/11508169/7d75c513f69d/pone.0309799.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验