• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

退伍军人事务部患者群体中糖尿病足感染骨活检的细菌学分析。

Bacteriologic analysis of bone biopsy from diabetic foot infections within a VA patient population.

作者信息

Parks Charles, Nguyen Sandy

机构信息

California School of Podiatric Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
, United States.

出版信息

Foot (Edinb). 2019 Mar;38:1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.foot.2018.10.004
PMID:30530010
Abstract

Diabetic patients with foot infections were evaluated over a 5-year period from April 2005 to March 2010. Cultures were obtained from 92 patients after surgical debridement. All of the patients were classified as "severe" diabetic foot infections (DFIs) and PEDIS grade 4. Wound specimens were collected by bone biopsy and sent to San Francisco VA Medical Center Microbiology Department for aerobic and anaerobic cultures. Among the 92 cases, the study resulted in a total of 410 pathogens, which 203 pathogens were from bone cultures and 207 pathogens were from soft tissue cultures. 74% of cases were polymicrobial and 26% had growth of a single organism. Staphylococcus aureus presented in 49.35% of bone cultures and 55.38% of soft tissue cultures, Streptococcus species presented in 44.16% and 36.92% respectably and roughly 33% of both bone and soft tissue had staphylococcus coagulase negative present. Gram-negative organisms occurred in 25% of all cultures taken. Pseudomonas accounted for 15% of soft tissue infections but only 1.3% bone cultures. MRSA was found in 17.39% of cultures and VRE was seen in 4.34% of all culture results. Staphylococcus aureus was the most prevalent organisms seen. This study presents a comprehensive microbiological survey of diabetic patients with DFIs within the San Francisco VA Medical Center and this study will help guide physicians to improve clinical outcomes of DFIs by using proper antibiotics.

摘要

对2005年4月至2010年3月这5年间患有足部感染的糖尿病患者进行了评估。92例患者在手术清创后进行了培养。所有患者均被归类为“重度”糖尿病足感染(DFI)且为PEDIS 4级。通过骨活检收集伤口标本,并送往旧金山退伍军人医疗中心微生物科进行需氧和厌氧培养。在这92例病例中,研究共发现410种病原体,其中203种病原体来自骨培养,207种病原体来自软组织培养。74%的病例为多微生物感染,26%为单一微生物生长。金黄色葡萄球菌在49.35%的骨培养和55.38%的软组织培养中出现,链球菌分别在44.16%和36.92%的骨培养和软组织培养中出现,骨和软组织培养中约33%有凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌。革兰氏阴性菌在所有培养物中的占比为25%。铜绿假单胞菌占软组织感染的15%,但在骨培养中仅占1.3%。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)在17.39%的培养物中被发现,耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)在所有培养结果中的占比为4.34%。金黄色葡萄球菌是最常见的病原体。本研究对旧金山退伍军人医疗中心内患有DFI的糖尿病患者进行了全面的微生物学调查,该研究将有助于指导医生通过使用合适的抗生素来改善DFI的临床结局。

相似文献

1
Bacteriologic analysis of bone biopsy from diabetic foot infections within a VA patient population.退伍军人事务部患者群体中糖尿病足感染骨活检的细菌学分析。
Foot (Edinb). 2019 Mar;38:1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
2
A retrospective analysis of the microbiology of diabetic foot infections at a Scottish tertiary hospital.苏格兰一家三级医院糖尿病足感染微生物学的回顾性分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-4923-1.
3
Deep wound cultures correlate well with bone biopsy culture in diabetic foot osteomyelitis.深部创面培养与糖尿病足骨髓炎的骨活检培养相关性良好。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2013 Oct;29(7):546-50. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2425.
4
Bacteriology of moderate-to-severe diabetic foot infections and in vitro activity of antimicrobial agents.中重度糖尿病足感染的细菌学及抗菌药物的体外活性
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Sep;45(9):2819-28. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00551-07. Epub 2007 Jul 3.
5
Microbiology of osteomyelitis in diabetic foot infections.糖尿病足感染中骨髓炎的微生物学
J Foot Ankle Surg. 1995 Jan-Feb;34(1):61-4. doi: 10.1016/S1067-2516(09)80103-8.
6
Culture of percutaneous bone biopsy specimens for diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis: concordance with ulcer swab cultures.经皮骨活检标本培养用于诊断糖尿病足骨髓炎:与溃疡拭子培养结果的一致性
Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Jan 1;42(1):57-62. doi: 10.1086/498112. Epub 2005 Nov 21.
7
Virulence Factor Genes in Staphylococcus aureus Isolated From Diabetic Foot Soft Tissue and Bone Infections.从糖尿病足软组织和骨感染中分离出的金黄色葡萄球菌中的毒力因子基因
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2018 Mar;17(1):36-41. doi: 10.1177/1534734618764237. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
8
Diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections.糖尿病足感染的诊断与治疗
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Jun;117(7 Suppl):212S-238S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000222737.09322.77.
9
Pathogens isolated from deep soft tissue and bone in patients with diabetic foot infections.从糖尿病足感染患者的深部软组织和骨骼中分离出的病原体。
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2008 Jul-Aug;98(4):290-5. doi: 10.7547/0980290.
10
Microbial profile and utility of soft tissue, pus, and bone cultures in diagnosing diabetic foot infections.软组织、脓液和骨培养物的微生物谱及其在诊断糖尿病足感染中的应用。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Aug;14(8):669-74. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0039. Epub 2012 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Anaerobes in diabetic foot infections: pathophysiology, epidemiology, virulence, and management.糖尿病足感染中的厌氧菌:病理生理学、流行病学、毒力和治疗。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024 Sep 12;37(3):e0014323. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00143-23. Epub 2024 May 31.
2
Relative Abundance and Detection of from Chronic Wound Infections Globally.全球慢性伤口感染中[具体物质]的相对丰度及检测
Microorganisms. 2023 May 5;11(5):1210. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11051210.
3
Is fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous bone biopsy of diabetic foot with suspected osteomyelitis worthwhile? A retrospective study.
氟透视引导下经皮骨活检对疑似骨髓炎的糖尿病足是否有价值?一项回顾性研究。
J Diabetes. 2023 Apr;15(4):332-337. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13377. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
4
Microbiological Species and Antibiotic Resistance in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Lower Extremity Wounds: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.糖尿病和非糖尿病下肢创面的微生物物种和抗生素耐药性:一项比较性横断面研究。
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2024 Jun;23(2):338-346. doi: 10.1177/15347346211053936. Epub 2021 Nov 6.