• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

软组织、脓液和骨培养物的微生物谱及其在诊断糖尿病足感染中的应用。

Microbial profile and utility of soft tissue, pus, and bone cultures in diagnosing diabetic foot infections.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Aug;14(8):669-74. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0039. Epub 2012 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1089/dia.2012.0039
PMID:22690924
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the utility of pus, soft tissue, and bone specimens in diagnosing diabetic foot infections and the spectrum of the microbial flora and in vitro susceptibility to antibiotics.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This prospective study was carried out in 60 consecutive patients with diabetes having clinically infected foot ulcers. Detailed history, physical examination, and investigation were carried out to diagnose the presence of osteomyelitis and the microbial etiology of foot ulcers. Foot ulcers were classified as per Wagner's classification. Soft tissue, pus, and bone samples were obtained and cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out as per the standard protocol.

RESULTS

Causative bacteria were isolated in 55 of 60 patients, and 157 isolates were cultured from 117 specimens with an average of 1.34 isolates per cases; however, the number of isolates per specimen did not differ among the various types of samples (P=0.78). Pus and soft tissue had predominantly polymicrobial flora, whereas bone infections were monomicrobial. The isolates from soft tissue specimens were different from those from bone and pus in 57% and 54% of cases, respectively. The common bacterial isolates from 117 specimens included Escherichia coli (21%) and Proteus species (15.9%). Nearly 70% of Staphylococcus aureus isolates were methicillin sensitive. All S. aureus and Enterococcus isolates were sensitive to vancomycin. Susceptibility of Gram-negative organisms to ciprofloxacin was 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetic foot infections are mostly polymicrobial with Gram-negative predominance. Multiple sampling from superficial and deep tissues, including bone, when involved, yields more relevant information diagnostically and therapeutically.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了脓液、软组织和骨标本在诊断糖尿病足感染中的作用,以及微生物菌群的分布和体外抗生素敏感性。

方法

本前瞻性研究纳入了 60 例连续的糖尿病合并临床感染性足部溃疡患者。详细的病史、体格检查和调查用于诊断骨髓炎的存在和足部溃疡的微生物病因。根据 Wagner 分类法对足部溃疡进行分类。采集软组织、脓液和骨标本进行需氧和厌氧菌培养,并按照标准方案进行抗菌药物敏感性试验。

结果

在 60 例患者中,有 55 例培养出了病原菌,从 117 个标本中培养出了 157 株,平均每例 1.34 株;然而,各种类型标本的分离株数量无差异(P=0.78)。脓液和软组织主要为混合菌群,而骨感染为单一菌群。软组织标本的分离株与骨和脓液标本的分离株在 57%和 54%的情况下不同。117 个标本中常见的细菌分离株包括大肠杆菌(21%)和变形杆菌属(15.9%)。近 70%的金黄色葡萄球菌分离株对甲氧西林敏感。所有金黄色葡萄球菌和肠球菌分离株均对万古霉素敏感。革兰氏阴性菌对环丙沙星的敏感性为 50%。

结论

糖尿病足感染主要为混合菌群感染,以革兰氏阴性菌为主。当涉及到深部组织(包括骨骼)时,从浅表和深部组织进行多次采样可以提供更具诊断和治疗意义的信息。

相似文献

1
Microbial profile and utility of soft tissue, pus, and bone cultures in diagnosing diabetic foot infections.软组织、脓液和骨培养物的微生物谱及其在诊断糖尿病足感染中的应用。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Aug;14(8):669-74. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0039. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
2
Virulence Factor Genes in Staphylococcus aureus Isolated From Diabetic Foot Soft Tissue and Bone Infections.从糖尿病足软组织和骨感染中分离出的金黄色葡萄球菌中的毒力因子基因
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2018 Mar;17(1):36-41. doi: 10.1177/1534734618764237. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
3
A retrospective analysis of the microbiology of diabetic foot infections at a Scottish tertiary hospital.苏格兰一家三级医院糖尿病足感染微生物学的回顾性分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-4923-1.
4
Antibiotic therapy for diabetic foot infections in a tertiary care hospital in Jakarta, Indonesia.印度尼西亚雅加达一家三级护理医院中糖尿病足感染的抗生素治疗
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2014 Oct-Dec;8(4):221-4. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
5
Microbiological pattern of diabetic foot infections at a tertiary care center in a developing country.发展中国家一家三级医疗中心糖尿病足感染的微生物学特征
J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 May;67(5):665-669.
6
Aerobic bacterial profile and antibiotic resistance in patients with diabetic foot infections.糖尿病足感染患者的需氧菌谱及抗生素耐药性
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2015 Sep-Oct;48(5):546-54. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0146-2015.
7
Clinico-microbiological study and antimicrobial drug resistance profile of diabetic foot infections in North India.印度北部糖尿病足感染的临床微生物学研究及抗菌药物耐药情况
Foot (Edinb). 2011 Mar;21(1):6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2010.10.003. Epub 2010 Dec 4.
8
Microbiology of diabetic foot infections in a teaching hospital in Malaysia: a retrospective study of 194 cases.马来西亚一家教学医院糖尿病足感染的微生物学:194例回顾性研究
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2007 Feb;40(1):39-44.
9
Microbiological profile of bacterial pathogens from diabetic foot infections in tertiary care hospitals, Salem.塞勒姆三级护理医院糖尿病足感染细菌病原体的微生物学特征
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2014 Jul-Sep;8(3):129-32. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
10
The microbiology of diabetic foot infections in patients recently treated with antibiotic therapy: A prospective study from India.近期接受抗生素治疗的糖尿病足感染患者的微生物学研究:一项来自印度的前瞻性研究。
J Diabetes Complications. 2017 Feb;31(2):407-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Spinal Cord Injury From Tuberculous Spondylitis Misdiagnosed as Metastatic Spinal Tumor and Bacterial Spondylitis: A Case Report & Literature Review.误诊为转移性脊柱肿瘤和细菌性脊柱炎的结核性脊柱炎所致脊髓损伤:一例报告及文献复习
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2024 Dec 17;20(4):246-251. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2024.20.e41. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Microbiological profile of diabetic foot infections in China and worldwide: a 20-year systematic review.中国及全球范围内糖尿病足感染的微生物学特征:一项 20 年的系统综述。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 28;15:1368046. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1368046. eCollection 2024.
3
Bacteriological analysis and antibiotic resistance in patients with diabetic foot ulcers in Dhaka.
达卡糖尿病足溃疡患者的细菌学分析及抗生素耐药性
PLoS One. 2024 May 17;19(5):e0301767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301767. eCollection 2024.
4
Successful Outpatient Treatment of Severe Diabetic-Foot Myositis and Osteomyelitis Caused by Extensively Drug-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis with Teicoplanin plus Rifampicin: A Case Report.严重糖尿病足肌炎和骨髓炎的门诊治疗成功:耐多药粪肠球菌引起的,替考拉宁联合利福平治疗:一例报告。
Am J Case Rep. 2023 Nov 1;24:e941337. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.941337.
5
Diabetic Foot Ulcer in India: Aetiological Trends and Bacterial Diversity.印度的糖尿病足溃疡:病因学趋势与细菌多样性
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Mar-Apr;27(2):107-114. doi: 10.4103/ijem.ijem_458_22. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
6
Isolation and Characterization of Bacteriophages Active against Strains Isolated from Diabetic Foot Infections.分离和鉴定针对糖尿病足感染分离株的噬菌体。
Arch Razi Inst. 2022 Dec 31;77(6):2187-2200. doi: 10.22092/ARI.2022.359032.2357. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Distribution of microbes and antimicrobial susceptibility in patients with diabetic foot infections in South China.中国南方地区糖尿病足感染患者的微生物分布及药敏情况。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 24;14:1113622. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1113622. eCollection 2023.
8
Frequency and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Diabetic Foot Infection of Patients from Bandar Abbas District, Southern Iran.伊朗南部阿巴斯港地区患者糖尿病足感染的频率及抗菌药物敏感性模式
J Pathog. 2020 Jun 9;2020:1057167. doi: 10.1155/2020/1057167. eCollection 2020.
9
A Perioperative Approach to Increase Limb Salvage When Treating Foot Ulcers in Patients With Diabetes.糖尿病患者足部溃疡治疗中增加肢体挽救率的围手术期方法
AORN J. 2018 Apr;107(4):431-440. doi: 10.1002/aorn.12099.
10
Bacterial Profile and Antibiotic Resistance in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcer in Guangzhou, Southern China: Focus on the Differences among Different Wagner's Grades, IDSA/IWGDF Grades, and Ulcer Types.中国南方广州糖尿病足溃疡患者的细菌谱及抗生素耐药性:聚焦不同瓦格纳分级、美国感染病学会/国际糖尿病足工作组分级和溃疡类型之间的差异
Int J Endocrinol. 2017;2017:8694903. doi: 10.1155/2017/8694903. Epub 2017 Jul 11.