Department of Neurology & Stroke, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Service of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation, Laboratory of Neuroscience (LIM27) and National Institute of Biomarkers in Psychiatry (INBioN), Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 7;13(12):e0208747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208747. eCollection 2018.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can induce excitability changes of a stimulated brain area through synaptic plasticity mechanisms. High-frequency (100 Hz) triplets of rTMS synchronized to the negative but not the positive peak of the ongoing sensorimotor μ-rhythm isolated with the concurrently acquired electroencephalography (EEG) resulted in a reproducible long-term potentiation like increase of motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, an index of corticospinal excitability (Zrenner et al. 2018, Brain Stimul 11:374-389). Here, we analyzed the EEG and TMS-EEG data from (Zrenner et al., 2018) to investigate the effects of μ-rhythm-phase-dependent burst-rTMS on EEG-based measures of cortical excitability. We used resting-state EEG to assess μ- and β-power in the motor cortex ipsi- and contralateral to the stimulation, and single-pulse TMS-evoked and induced EEG responses in the stimulated motor cortex. We found that μ-rhythm-phase-dependent burst-rTMS did not significantly change any of these EEG measures, despite the presence of a significant differential and reproducible effect on MEP amplitude. We conclude that EEG measures of cortical excitability do not reflect corticospinal excitability as measured by MEP amplitude. Most likely this is explained by the fact that rTMS induces complex changes at the molecular and synaptic level towards both excitation and inhibition that cannot be differentiated at the macroscopic level by EEG.
重复经颅磁刺激 (rTMS) 可以通过突触可塑性机制诱导刺激脑区的兴奋性变化。高频(100 Hz)rTMS 三连串与正在进行的感觉运动 μ 节律的负峰而不是正峰同步,该 μ 节律是通过同时获得的脑电图 (EEG) 分离出来的,导致运动诱发电位 (MEP) 幅度的可重复长时程增强样增加,这是皮质脊髓兴奋性的指标 (Zrenner 等人,2018 年,大脑刺激 11:374-389)。在这里,我们分析了 (Zrenner 等人,2018 年) 的 EEG 和 TMS-EEG 数据,以研究 μ 节律相位依赖性爆发 rTMS 对基于 EEG 的皮质兴奋性测量的影响。我们使用静息状态 EEG 来评估刺激对侧和同侧运动皮层的 μ 和 β 功率,以及刺激运动皮层的单脉冲 TMS 诱发和诱导 EEG 反应。我们发现,尽管 MEP 幅度存在显著的差异和可重复的影响,但 μ 节律相位依赖性爆发 rTMS 并没有显著改变这些 EEG 测量值中的任何一个。我们得出的结论是,EEG 测量的皮质兴奋性不能反映 MEP 幅度测量的皮质脊髓兴奋性。最有可能的解释是,rTMS 在分子和突触水平上诱导了复杂的变化,既可以兴奋,也可以抑制,这在宏观水平上不能通过 EEG 区分。