• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Re-thinking performance assessment for primary care: Opinion of the expert panel on effective ways of investing in health.重新思考基层医疗绩效评估:投资健康的有效途径专家小组的意见。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2019 Jan;25(1):55-61. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2018.1546284. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
2
From concept to application: the impact of a community-wide intervention to improve the delivery of preventive services to children.从概念到应用:一项全社区干预措施对改善儿童预防性服务提供情况的影响。
Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):E42. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.3.e42.
3
The European primary care monitor: structure, process and outcome indicators.欧洲初级保健监测:结构、过程和结果指标。
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Oct 27;11:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-81.
4
['European primary care': a visionary report of the Dutch Health Council on primary health care in the European Union].《“欧洲初级保健”:荷兰卫生委员会关于欧盟初级卫生保健的前瞻性报告》
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 May 14;149(20):1086-8.
5
Workforce Configurations to Provide High-Quality, Comprehensive Primary Care: a Mixed-Method Exploration of Staffing for Four Types of Primary Care Practices.提供高质量、综合性初级保健的劳动力配置:对四种初级保健实践的人员配备进行的混合方法探索。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1774-1779. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4530-7. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
6
Strength of primary care service delivery: a comparative study of European countries, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada.基层医疗服务提供的强度:欧洲国家、澳大利亚、新西兰和加拿大的比较研究。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 May;19(3):277-287. doi: 10.1017/S1463423617000792. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
7
Creating performance intelligence for primary health care strengthening in Europe.为加强欧洲初级卫生保健而建立绩效智能
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 27;19(1):1006. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4853-z.
8
Development of a core set of quality indicators for paediatric primary care practices in Europe, COSI-PPC-EU.开发一套欧洲儿科初级保健实践的核心质量指标,COSIPPC-EU。
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Jun;177(6):921-933. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3140-z. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
9
Primary care quality indicators for children: measuring quality in UK general practice.儿童初级保健质量指标:衡量英国全科医疗的质量
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Dec;64(629):e752-7. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X682813.
10
Developing a performance framework for measuring comprehensive, community-based primary healthcare for people with HIV.为衡量针对艾滋病毒感染者的全面、基于社区的初级医疗保健制定一个绩效框架。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2016 Jul;17(4):361-84. doi: 10.1017/S1463423615000572. Epub 2015 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Dutch Translation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Person-Centered Primary Care Measure.《以患者为中心的初级保健测评量表的荷兰文翻译与心理计量学评估》。
Ann Fam Med. 2024 Jul-Aug;22(4):288-293. doi: 10.1370/afm.3135.
2
A Multi-dimensional Framework of Valued Output for Primary Care in England.英国初级保健的多维有价值产出框架。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 Sep;22(5):609-617. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00895-z. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
3
Identifying key policy objectives for strong primary care: a cross-sectional study.确定强有力的初级保健政策目标:一项横断面研究。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2023 Aug 14;24:e52. doi: 10.1017/S1463423623000403.
4
Organization of primary care.基层医疗组织。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2022 Sep 1;23:e49. doi: 10.1017/S1463423622000275.
5
MedMinas project: design and use of mixed methods in the evaluation of pharmaceutical services in primary health care in Minas Gerais, Brazil.米纳斯吉拉斯医药服务评估混合方法设计与应用项目:巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州基层医疗中的医药服务评估
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Mar 27;22(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01568-y.
6
Approaches to Measure Efficiency in Primary Care: A Systematic Literature Review.基层医疗效率衡量方法:系统文献回顾。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Jan;20(1):19-33. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00669-x. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
7
Variability in the assessment of children's primary healthcare in 30 European countries.30个欧洲国家儿童初级医疗保健评估的差异
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Feb 8;33(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab007.

本文引用的文献

1
Reputations count: why benchmarking performance is improving health care across the world.声誉很重要:基准绩效为何能改善全球医疗服务。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2019 Apr;14(2):141-161. doi: 10.1017/S1744133117000561. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
2
The link between income inequality and health in Europe, adding strength dimensions of primary care to the equation.欧洲收入不平等与健康之间的联系,为方程增加了初级保健的强度维度。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Mar;201:103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.041. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
3
Variation matters and should be included in health care research for comparison of outcomes.
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017 Mar;18(2):183-187. doi: 10.1017/S1463423616000438. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
4
Making governance work in the health care sector: evidence from a 'natural experiment' in Italy.让治理在医疗保健领域发挥作用:来自意大利一项“自然实验”的证据。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2016 Jan;11(1):17-38. doi: 10.1017/S1744133115000067. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
5
The journey toward high performance and excellent quality.通往高性能和卓越品质的征程。
Healthc Q. 2012;15 Spec No:6-9. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2012.23152.
6
Europe's strong primary care systems are linked to better population health but also to higher health spending.欧洲强大的初级保健系统不仅与更好的人口健康有关,也与更高的卫生支出有关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Apr;32(4):686-94. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1242.
7
Primary care: an increasingly important contributor to effectiveness, equity, and efficiency of health services. SESPAS report 2012.初级保健:对卫生服务的有效性、公平性和效率的贡献日益重要。2012年西班牙公共卫生与社会服务部报告
Gac Sanit. 2012 Mar;26 Suppl 1:20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.10.009. Epub 2012 Jan 21.
8
QUALICOPC, a multi-country study evaluating quality, costs and equity in primary care.QUALICOPC,一项多国研究,评估初级保健的质量、成本和公平性。
BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Oct 20;12:115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-115.
9
Medical engagement: a crucial underpinning to organizational performance.医疗参与:组织绩效的关键支撑。
Health Serv Manage Res. 2011 Aug;24(3):114-20. doi: 10.1258/hsmr.2011.011006.
10
The European primary care monitor: structure, process and outcome indicators.欧洲初级保健监测:结构、过程和结果指标。
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Oct 27;11:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-81.

重新思考基层医疗绩效评估:投资健康的有效途径专家小组的意见。

Re-thinking performance assessment for primary care: Opinion of the expert panel on effective ways of investing in health.

机构信息

a Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Department of Public Health , University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC , Amsterdam , The Netherlands.

b Laboratorio Management e Sanità, Institute of Management , Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies , Pisa , Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Gen Pract. 2019 Jan;25(1):55-61. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2018.1546284. Epub 2018 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1080/13814788.2018.1546284
PMID:30539675
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6394311/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2017, the European Commission (EC) identified as a policy priority the performance assessment of primary care systems, which relates to a country's primary care structure, services delivery and outcomes. The EC requested its Expert Panel on Effective Ways of Investing in Health (Expert Panel) to provide an opinion on ways for improving performance assessment of primary care.

OBJECTIVES

To provide an overview of domains and dimensions to be taken into consideration in assessing primary care and specific indicators to be collected and analysed to improve understanding of primary care performance.

METHODS

A sub-group of the Expert Panel performed a literature review. The opinion was drafted, improved and approved through working-group discussions, consultations with the EC, the Expert Group on Health Systems Performance Assessment, and a public hearing.

RESULTS

Drawing on the main characteristics of primary care, we propose essential elements of a primary care performance assessment system based on specific indicators. We identified ten domains with accompanying dimensions for which comparative key indicators and descriptive indicators are proposed: (1) universal and accessible care, (2) integrated, (3) person-centred, (4) comprehensive and community-oriented care, (5) provided by a team accountable for addressing a vast majority of personal health needs, (6) sustained partnership with patients and informal caregivers, (7) coordination, (8) continuity of care, (9) primary care organization, and (10) human resources.

CONCLUSION

The identified characteristics and criteria for development of a primary care performance assessment system provides a starting point for strengthening the coherence of assessment frameworks across countries and exchanging best practices.

摘要

背景

2017 年,欧盟委员会(EC)将初级保健系统绩效评估确定为优先政策,这与一个国家的初级保健结构、服务提供和结果有关。欧盟委员会要求其卫生投资效益专家小组(Expert Panel)就改善初级保健绩效评估的方法提供意见。

目的

概述评估初级保健时需要考虑的领域和维度,以及为了更好地了解初级保健绩效而需要收集和分析的具体指标。

方法

专家小组的一个分组进行了文献回顾。该意见草案通过工作组讨论、与欧盟委员会、卫生系统绩效评估专家组的磋商以及公开听证会进行了改进和批准。

结果

根据初级保健的主要特征,我们提出了基于具体指标的初级保健绩效评估系统的基本要素。我们确定了十个领域及其伴随的维度,为每个领域提出了比较关键指标和描述性指标:(1)普遍可及的护理,(2)整合,(3)以患者为中心,(4)全面和以社区为导向的护理,(5)由负责解决绝大多数个人健康需求的团队提供,(6)与患者和非正式照护者持续合作,(7)协调,(8)护理连续性,(9)初级保健组织,和(10)人力资源。

结论

确定的初级保健绩效评估系统的特征和发展标准为加强各国评估框架的一致性和交流最佳实践提供了起点。