Suppr超能文献

不同最大心率测定方法对篮球运动员训练负荷结果的影响。

Influence of Different Methods to Determine Maximum Heart Rate on Training Load Outcomes in Basketball Players.

机构信息

School of Health, Medical, and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia.

Human Exercise and Training Laboratory, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Nov;32(11):3177-3185. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002291.

Abstract

Berkelmans, DM, Dalbo, VJ, Fox, JL, Stanton, R, Kean, CO, Giamarelos, KE, Teramoto, M, and Scanlan, AT. Influence of different methods to determine maximum heart rate on training load outcomes in basketball players. J Strength Cond Res 32(11): 3177-3185, 2018-The summated-heart-rate-zones (SHRZ) approach uses heart rate (HR) responses relative to maximum HR (HRmax) to calculate the internal training load (TL). Age-predicted, test-derived, and session-based approaches have all been used to determine HRmax in team sports. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of using age-predicted, test-derived, and session-based HRmax responses on SHRZ TL in basketball players. Semiprofessional, male basketball players (N = 6) were analyzed during the preparatory training phase. Six age-based approaches were used to predict HRmax including Fox (220 - age); Hossack (206 - [0.567 × age]); Tanaka (208 - [0.7 × age]); Nikolaidis (223 - [1.44 × age]); Nes (211 - [0.64 × age]); and Faff (209.9 - [0.73 × age]). Test-derived HRmax was taken as the highest HR during the Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test (Yo-Yo IRT), whereas session-based HRmax was taken as the higher HR seen during the Yo-Yo IRT or training sessions. Comparisons in SHRZ TL were made at group and individual levels. No significant group differences were evident between SHRZ approaches. Effect size analyses revealed moderate (d = 0.60-0.79) differences between age-predicted, test-derived, and session-based methods across the group and individually in 2 players. The moderate differences between approaches suggest age-predicted, test-derived, and session-based methods to determine HRmax are not interchangeable when calculating SHRZ. Basketball practitioners are encouraged to use individualized HRmax directly measured during field-based tests supplemented with higher HR responses evident during training sessions and games when calculating the SHRZ TL to ensure greatest accuracy.

摘要

贝尔克曼斯、DM、达尔博、VJ、福克斯、JL、斯坦顿、R、基恩、CO、贾马雷洛斯、KE、寺本、M 和斯坎兰、AT。不同方法测定最大心率对篮球运动员训练负荷结果的影响。《力量与体能研究杂志》32(11):3177-3185,2018 年-总和心率区间(SHRZ)方法使用与最大心率(HRmax)相关的心率(HR)反应来计算内部训练负荷(TL)。在团队运动中,已经使用了年龄预测、测试衍生和基于会话的方法来确定 HRmax。本研究的目的是确定使用年龄预测、测试衍生和基于会话的 HRmax 反应对篮球运动员 SHRZ TL 的影响。半职业男性篮球运动员(N=6)在预备训练阶段进行了分析。使用了六种基于年龄的方法来预测 HRmax,包括福克斯(220-年龄);霍萨克(206-([0.567×年龄]);田中(208-([0.7×年龄]);尼古拉迪斯(223-([1.44×年龄]);内斯(211-([0.64×年龄]);和法夫(209.9-([0.73×年龄])。测试衍生的 HRmax 被视为 Yo-Yo 间歇性恢复测试(Yoyo IRT)期间的最高 HR,而基于会话的 HRmax 则被视为 Yo-Yo IRT 或训练期间看到的较高 HR。在组和个体水平上比较了 SHRZ TL。在 SHRZ 方法之间没有观察到组间的显著差异。效应大小分析显示,在 2 名运动员中,群体和个体之间,年龄预测、测试衍生和基于会话的方法之间存在中等差异(d=0.60-0.79)。方法之间的中等差异表明,在计算 SHRZ 时,预测年龄、测试衍生和基于会话的方法不能互换。鼓励篮球从业者在计算 SHRZ TL 时,直接使用基于现场测试测量的个体 HRmax,并辅以训练期间和比赛中出现的较高 HR 反应,以确保最大的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验