Steinberg Johannes, Siebert Marlene, Katz Toam, Frings Andreas, Mehlan Juliane, Druchkiv Vasyl, Bühren Jens, Linke Stephan J
J Refract Surg. 2018 Dec 1;34(12):840-847. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20181012-01.
To analyze the potential benefit of the newly developed Tomography and Biomechanical Index (TBI) for early keratoconus screening.
In this retrospective study, the discriminatory power of the corneal tomography Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display (BAD-D) index and the newly developed Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI) and TBI to differentiate between normal eyes, manifest keratoconus eyes (KCE), very asymmetric keratoconus eyes with ectasia (VAE-E), and their fellow eyes with either regular topography (VAE-NT) or regular topography and tomography (VAE-NTT) were analyzed by applying the t test (for normal distribution), Wilcoxon matched-pairs test (if not normally distributed), and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). The DeLong test was used to compare the area under the ROC (AUROC). Further, the cut-offs of the analyzed indices presented in a study by Ambrósio et al. from 2017 were applied in the study population to enable a cross-validation in an independent study population.
All indices demonstrated a high discriminative power when comparing normal and advanced keratoconus, which decreased when comparing normal and VAE-NT eyes and further when analyzing normal versus VAE-NTT eyes. The difference between the AUROCs reached a statistically significant level when comparing TBI versus BAD-D analyzing normal versus all included keratoconic eyes (P = .02). The TBI presented with the highest AUROCs throughout all conducted analyses when comparing different keratoconus stages, although not reaching a statistically significant level. Applying the cut-offs presented by Ambrósio et al. to differentiate between normal and VAE-NT in the study population, the accuracy was reproducible (accuracy in our study population with an optimized TBI cut-off: 0.72, with the cut-off defined by Ambrósio et al. 0.67).
The TBI enables karatoconus screening in topographical and tomographical regular keratoconic eyes. To further improve the screening accuray, prospective studies should be conducted. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(12):840-847.].
分析新开发的断层扫描与生物力学指数(TBI)在早期圆锥角膜筛查中的潜在益处。
在这项回顾性研究中,通过应用t检验(用于正态分布)、Wilcoxon配对检验(若不呈正态分布)和受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),分析角膜断层扫描的贝林/安布罗西奥增强扩张显示(BAD-D)指数、新开发的Corvis生物力学指数(CBI)和TBI区分正常眼、明显圆锥角膜眼(KCE)、伴有扩张的极不对称圆锥角膜眼(VAE-E)以及其具有规则地形图(VAE-NT)或规则地形图和断层扫描(VAE-NTT)的对侧眼的鉴别能力。使用德龙检验比较ROC曲线下面积(AUROC)。此外,将安布罗西奥等人2017年一项研究中给出的分析指数的截断值应用于研究人群,以便在独立研究人群中进行交叉验证。
在比较正常眼和晚期圆锥角膜时,所有指数均显示出较高的鉴别能力,而在比较正常眼和VAE-NT眼时鉴别能力下降,在分析正常眼与VAE-NTT眼时鉴别能力进一步下降。在比较TBI与BAD-D分析正常眼与所有纳入的圆锥角膜眼时,AUROC之间的差异达到统计学显著水平(P = 0.02)。在比较不同圆锥角膜阶段时,TBI在所有进行的分析中呈现出最高的AUROC,尽管未达到统计学显著水平。将安布罗西奥等人给出的截断值应用于研究人群以区分正常眼和VAE-NT,准确性是可重复的(在我们的研究人群中,优化后的TBI截断值的准确性为0.72,安布罗西奥等人定义的截断值为0.67)。
TBI能够在地形图和断层扫描均正常的圆锥角膜眼中进行圆锥角膜筛查。为进一步提高筛查准确性,应开展前瞻性研究。[《屈光手术杂志》。2018;34(12):840 - 847。]