1 Decision Analytics, Sax Institute, Haymarket, NSW, Australia.
2 Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;53(7):642-650. doi: 10.1177/0004867418817381. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
Successive suicide prevention frameworks and action plans in Australia and internationally have called for improvements to mental health services and enhancement of workforce capacity. However, there is debate regarding the priorities for resource allocation and the optimal combination of mental health services to best prevent suicidal behaviour. This study investigates the potential impacts of service capacity improvements on the incidence of suicidal behaviour in the Australian context.
A system dynamics model was developed to investigate the optimal combination of (1) secondary (acute) mental health service capacity, (2) non-secondary (non-acute) mental health service capacity and (3) resources to re-engage those lost to services on the incidence of suicidal behaviour over the period 2018-2028 for the Greater Western Sydney (Australia) population catchment. The model captured population and behavioural dynamics and mental health service referral pathways and was validated using population survey and administrative data, evidence syntheses and an expert stakeholder group.
Findings suggest that 28% of attempted suicide and 29% of suicides could be averted over the forecast period based on a combination of increases in (1) hospital staffing (with training in trauma-informed care), (2) non-secondary health service capacity, (3) expansion of mental health assessment capacity and (4) re-engagement of at least 45% of individuals lost to services. Reduction in the number of available psychiatric beds by 15% had no substantial impact on the incidence of attempted suicide and suicide over the forecast period.
This study suggests that more than one-quarter of suicides and attempted suicides in the Greater Western Sydney population catchment could potentially be averted with a combination of increases to hospital staffing and non-secondary (non-acute) mental health care. Reductions in tertiary care services (e.g. psychiatric hospital beds) in combination with these increases would not adversely affect subsequent incidence of suicidal behaviour.
澳大利亚和国际上连续的自杀预防框架和行动计划呼吁改善心理健康服务并增强劳动力能力。然而,对于资源分配的优先事项和最佳预防自杀行为的心理健康服务的最佳组合存在争议。本研究调查了服务能力提高对澳大利亚自杀行为发生率的潜在影响。
开发了一个系统动力学模型,以调查在 2018-2028 年期间,(1)二级(急性)心理健康服务能力、(2)非二级(非急性)心理健康服务能力和(3)重新吸引服务中失去联系的资源的最佳组合对大悉尼西部地区(澳大利亚)人口范围内自杀行为发生率的影响。该模型捕捉了人口和行为动态以及心理健康服务转介途径,并使用人口调查和行政数据、证据综合和专家利益相关者小组进行了验证。
研究结果表明,在预测期内,通过增加以下内容的组合,可能会避免 28%的自杀未遂和 29%的自杀:(1)医院人员配备(接受创伤知情护理培训)、(2)非二级卫生服务能力、(3)扩大心理健康评估能力以及(4)重新吸引至少 45%的失去服务的个人。在预测期内,减少可用精神科床位 15%对自杀未遂和自杀的发生率没有实质性影响。
本研究表明,通过增加医院人员配备和非二级(非急性)心理健康护理,大悉尼西部地区人口中超过四分之一的自杀和自杀未遂可能被避免。减少三级护理服务(例如精神病院床位)与这些增加相结合,不会对随后的自杀行为发生率产生不利影响。