He Yan, Wang Xiao Yan, Hu Qiao, Chen Xue Xue, Ling Bing, Wei Hai Ming
Department of Ultrasound, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Department of Pathology, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Nov 27;9:1363. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01363. eCollection 2018.
To assess the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. CEUS was performed in eighty-eight thyroid nodules. The patterns of CEUS were analyzed, and ARFI was then performed. The shear wave velocities (SWVs) of the nodules and the surrounding normal thyroid tissue were obtained. The areas under the curve (AUCs) and cut-off value were obtained by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic rate of each modality were assessed and compared using pathological diagnosis. Among 88 nodules, 29 nodules were malignant and 59 were benign. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic rate of CEUS were 79.3, 91.5, 82.1, 90, and 87.5%, respectively. Using a cut-off value of 2.565 m/s for SWV, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic rate for malignancy were 75.9, 94.9, 88.0, 88.9, and 88.6%, respectively. The AUC was 0.878. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic rate of CEUS in combination with ARFI were 93.1, 89.8, 81.8, 96.3, and 90.9%, respectively. Both CEUS and ARFI are valuable for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Combining these two methods can improve the diagnostic rate.
评估超声造影(CEUS)和声学辐射力脉冲(ARFI)成像在甲状腺良恶性结节鉴别诊断中的价值。对88个甲状腺结节进行CEUS检查。分析CEUS的表现模式,然后进行ARFI检查。获取结节及其周围正常甲状腺组织的剪切波速度(SWV)。通过受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析获得曲线下面积(AUC)和临界值。使用病理诊断评估并比较每种检查方法的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和诊断率。88个结节中,29个为恶性,59个为良性。CEUS的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV和诊断率分别为79.3%、91.5%、82.1%、90%和87.5%。以SWV的临界值2.565 m/s计算,对恶性病变的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV和诊断率分别为75.9%、94.9%、88.0%、88.9%和88.6%。AUC为0.878。CEUS联合ARFI的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV和诊断率分别为93.1%、89.8%、81.8%、96.3%和90.9%。CEUS和ARFI在甲状腺良恶性结节的鉴别诊断中均具有价值。联合这两种方法可提高诊断率。