Department of Psychological Methodology and Assessment, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Nussbaumstrasse 7, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020 Mar;270(2):153-168. doi: 10.1007/s00406-018-0967-2. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
The intentional distortion of test results presents a fundamental problem to self-report-based psychiatric assessment, such as screening for depressive symptoms. The first objective of the study was to clarify whether depressed patients like healthy controls possess both the cognitive ability and motivation to deliberately influence results of commonly used screening measures. The second objective was the construction of a method derived directly from within the test takers' responses to systematically detect faking behavior. Supervised machine learning algorithms posit the potential to empirically learn the implicit interconnections between responses, which shape detectable faking patterns. In a standardized design, faking bad and faking good were experimentally induced in a matched sample of 150 depressed and 150 healthy subjects. Participants completed commonly used questionnaires to detect depressive and associated symptoms. Group differences throughout experimental conditions were evaluated using linear mixed-models. Machine learning algorithms were trained on the test results and compared regarding their capacity to systematically predict distortions in response behavior in two scenarios: (1) differentiation of authentic patient responses from simulated responses of healthy participants; (2) differentiation of authentic patient responses from dissimulated patient responses. Statistically significant convergence of the test scores in both faking conditions suggests that both depressive patients and healthy controls have the cognitive ability as well as the motivational compliance to alter their test results. Evaluation of the algorithmic capability to detect faking behavior yielded ideal predictive accuracies of up to 89%. Implications of the findings, as well as future research objectives are discussed. Trial Registration The study was pre-registered at the German registry for clinical trials (Deutsches Register klinischer Studien, DRKS; DRKS00007708).
测试结果的蓄意扭曲对基于自我报告的精神病学评估构成了根本性问题,例如抑郁症状的筛查。该研究的首要目标是明确抑郁患者是否像健康对照者一样具有故意影响常用筛查措施结果的认知能力和动机。第二个目标是构建一种直接源自测试者反应的方法,以系统地检测伪造行为。受监督的机器学习算法具有从测试者的反应中经验性地学习潜在的隐含联系的潜力,这些联系构成了可检测的伪造模式。在标准化设计中,在 150 名抑郁患者和 150 名健康受试者的匹配样本中,实验性地诱导了伪造差和伪造好。参与者完成了常用的问卷,以检测抑郁和相关症状。使用线性混合模型评估实验条件下的组间差异。基于测试结果训练机器学习算法,并在两种情况下比较其系统预测反应行为扭曲的能力:(1)从健康参与者的模拟反应中区分真实患者的反应;(2)从伪装患者的反应中区分真实患者的反应。两种伪造情况下测试分数的显著收敛表明,抑郁患者和健康对照者都具有改变测试结果的认知能力和动机一致性。评估算法检测伪造行为的能力产生了高达 89%的理想预测准确率。讨论了研究结果的含义和未来的研究目标。试验注册该研究在德国临床试验注册处(Deutsches Register klinischer Studien,DRKS;DRKS00007708)进行了预先注册。