Suppr超能文献

1RM测试的高重复性和有效性不取决于老年女性的训练经验、测试的肌肉群或力量水平。

High 1RM Tests Reproducibility and Validity are not Dependent on Training Experience, Muscle Group Tested or Strength Level in Older Women.

作者信息

Barbalho Matheus, Gentil Paulo, Raiol Rodolfo, Del Vecchio Fabrício Boscolo, Ramirez-Campillo Rodrigo, Coswig Victor Silveira

机构信息

Faculdade de Educação Física e Dança, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil.

Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Centro Universitário do Pará, Belém 66040-020, Brazil.

出版信息

Sports (Basel). 2018 Dec 11;6(4):171. doi: 10.3390/sports6040171.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The maximal one-repetition test (1-RM) is widely used in scientific research; however, there are conflicting results regarding its reproducibility in elderly populations. The present study aimed to analyze the reproducibility of the test both before and after a 12-week training period by using the bench press and leg press 45° 1-RM tests in the elderly, taking into consideration the training experience and strength level of the women.

METHODS

Elderly women (n = 376; age, 68.5 ± 14.1 years; height, 162.7 ± 5.5 cm; body mass, 71.2 ± 16.0 kg) who underwent ≥3 months of resistance training performed an initial week of familiarization and a second week of testing and retest, with a 48⁻72 h interval.

RESULTS

The results showed that Kappa indices ranged from 0.93 to 0.95, and the intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.99 for both the lower and upper limbs. In addition, minimal detectable changes were found that ranged between 1 and 3%, which means that changes lower than 1 kg could be detected.

CONCLUSION

The present study confirms that the 1-RM test has high reliability and reproducibility in the elderly, for both upper and lower limbs.

摘要

背景

最大重复次数测试(1-RM)在科学研究中被广泛使用;然而,关于其在老年人群中的可重复性存在相互矛盾的结果。本研究旨在通过对老年人进行卧推和45°腿举1-RM测试,分析在为期12周的训练期前后该测试的可重复性,并考虑女性的训练经验和力量水平。

方法

接受了≥3个月抗阻训练的老年女性(n = 376;年龄,68.5±14.1岁;身高,162.7±5.5厘米;体重,71.2±16.0千克)进行了为期一周的熟悉期训练,以及为期一周的测试和重新测试,间隔时间为48 - 72小时。

结果

结果显示,卡帕指数范围为0.93至0.95,下肢和上肢的组内相关系数均为0.99。此外,发现最小可检测变化范围在1%至3%之间,这意味着可以检测到低于1千克的变化。

结论

本研究证实,1-RM测试在老年人的上肢和下肢中具有高可靠性和可重复性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7951/6315518/8f5228f43da7/sports-06-00171-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
The validity and reliability of the 1RM bench press using chain-loaded resistance.
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 May;22(3):678-83. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31816a6ce0.
3
Reliability of the one-repetition maximum test based on muscle group and gender.
J Sports Sci Med. 2012 Jun 1;11(2):221-5. eCollection 2012.
4
Influence of previous experience on resistance training on reliability of one-repetition maximum test.
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 May;25(5):1418-22. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d67c4b.
5
Test-retest reliability of barbell velocity during the free-weight bench-press exercise.
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Jan;25(1):171-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318201bdf9.
6
Effect of Lower-Body Resistance Training on Upper-Body Strength Adaptation in Trained Men.
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Jan;32(1):13-18. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001639.
7
Reliability and Agreement of the 10-Repetition Maximum Test in Breast Cancer Survivors.
Front Oncol. 2019 Sep 26;9:918. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00918. eCollection 2019.
8
9
Predicting one repetition maximum equations accuracy in paralympic rowers with motor disabilities.
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 May;23(3):1045-50. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a06356.
10
Familiarization indexes in sessions of 1-RM tests in adult women.
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Oct;23(7):2039-45. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b3e158.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability and validity of a full-body function Get-Up test in older adults.
Geroscience. 2025 Apr 14. doi: 10.1007/s11357-025-01643-4.
2
Test-retest reliability of the ten-repetition maximum test in untrained young males and females.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2024 Oct;36(10):598-602. doi: 10.1589/jpts.36.598. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
3
Developing Accurate Repetition Prediction Equations for Trained Older Adults with Osteopenia.
Sports (Basel). 2024 Aug 28;12(9):233. doi: 10.3390/sports12090233.
4
Incorporating Exercise Training into Cardio-Oncology Care: Current Evidence and Opportunities: State-of-the-Art Review.
JACC CardioOncol. 2023 Oct 17;5(5):553-569. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2023.08.008. eCollection 2023 Oct.
7
Test-Retest Reliability of Isokinetic Strength Measurements in Lower Limbs in Elderly.
Biology (Basel). 2022 May 24;11(6):802. doi: 10.3390/biology11060802.
9
Maximal force production requires OPTIMAL conditions.
Hum Mov Sci. 2020 Oct;73:102661. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2020.102661. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
10
Test-Retest Reliability of the One-Repetition Maximum (1RM) Strength Assessment: a Systematic Review.
Sports Med Open. 2020 Jul 17;6(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40798-020-00260-z.

本文引用的文献

1
There are no no-responders to low or high resistance training volumes among older women.
Exp Gerontol. 2017 Dec 1;99:18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
2
Isokinetic Dynamometry and 1RM Tests Produce Conflicting Results for Assessing Alterations in Muscle Strength.
J Hum Kinet. 2017 Mar 12;56:19-27. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0019. eCollection 2017 Feb.
4
High-Speed Resistance Training in Older Women: The Role of Supervision.
J Aging Phys Act. 2017 Jan;25(1):1-9. doi: 10.1123/japa.2015-0122. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
5
Is strength training associated with mortality benefits? A 15year cohort study of US older adults.
Prev Med. 2016 Jun;87:121-127. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.038. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
8
Aerobic versus resistance training effects on health-related quality of life, body composition, and function of older adults.
J Appl Gerontol. 2015 Apr;34(3):NP143-65. doi: 10.1177/0733464812468502. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
9
Reliability of the one-repetition maximum test based on muscle group and gender.
J Sports Sci Med. 2012 Jun 1;11(2):221-5. eCollection 2012.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验