Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌幸存者10次重复最大负荷测试的可靠性与一致性

Reliability and Agreement of the 10-Repetition Maximum Test in Breast Cancer Survivors.

作者信息

Dos Santos Wanderson Divino Nilo, Siqueira Gabriel Dutra de Jesus, Martins Wagner Rodrigues, Vieira Amilton, Schincaglia Raquel Machado, Gentil Paulo, Vieira Carlos Alexandre

机构信息

College of Physical Education and Dance, Federal University of Goias - UFG, Goiânia, Brazil.

College of Physical Education, University of Brasilia - UnB, Brasilia, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2019 Sep 26;9:918. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00918. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and agreement between the test and retest of the 10-repetition maximum (10-RM) test for leg press and bench press in breast cancer survivors (BCS). Thirty-one BCS participated in this study, age 54.87 ± 5.7 years. All performed 10-RM tests and retests for the leg press 45° and the bench press. For reliability analyses, an intraclass coefficient correlation (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) were performed. The limits of agreement were calculated using a Bland-Altman plot with 95% CIs. For absolute and relative error of measurement, we used standard error of measurement and minimally detectable change. The result showed a high reliability for the bench press and leg press; ICC of 0.94 and 0.98, respectively. CV was <10% for both exercises. The systematic error were 1.5 kg (10%) and 6.1 (8%) for the bench press and leg press, respectively. The standard errors of measurements were 0.96 kg (6.08%) and 4.11 kg (5.27%) for the bench press and leg press, respectively. The minimally detectable changes were 2.72 kg (17.20%) and 5.62 kg (7.21%) for the bench press and leg press, respectively. In breast cancer survivors, the muscular strength measurement for the 10-RM test showed a high to very high rate of reliability and agreement, with acceptable error of measurement.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估乳腺癌幸存者(BCS)进行腿举和卧推的10次最大重复量(10-RM)测试时,测试与复测之间的可靠性和一致性。31名BCS参与了本研究,年龄为54.87±5.7岁。所有人都进行了45°腿举和卧推的10-RM测试及复测。对于可靠性分析,进行了组内相关系数(ICC)和变异系数(CV)分析。使用带有95%置信区间的Bland-Altman图计算一致性界限。对于测量的绝对误差和相对误差,我们使用了测量标准误差和最小可检测变化。结果显示卧推和腿举具有高可靠性;ICC分别为0.94和0.98。两种练习的CV均<10%。卧推和腿举的系统误差分别为1.5千克(10%)和6.1(8%)。卧推和腿举的测量标准误差分别为0.96千克(6.08%)和4.11千克(5.27%)。卧推和腿举的最小可检测变化分别为2.72千克(17.20%)和5.62千克(7.21%)。在乳腺癌幸存者中,10-RM测试的肌肉力量测量显示出高到非常高的可靠性和一致性,且测量误差可接受。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3e1/6775190/7c562d453521/fonc-09-00918-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验