Editorial on: "Superion InterSpinous Spacer Treatment of Moderate Spinal Stenosis: 4-year Results".
作者信息
Caporlingua Federico
机构信息
Centro Chirurgico Toscano, Arezzo, Italy.
出版信息
J Spine Surg. 2018 Sep;4(3):666-667. doi: 10.21037/jss.2018.08.01.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Editorial on: "Superion InterSpinous Spacer Treatment of Moderate Spinal Stenosis: 4-year Results".关于《Superion椎间融合器治疗中度腰椎管狭窄症：4年随访结果》的社论
J Spine Surg. 2018 Sep;4(3):666-667. doi: 10.21037/jss.2018.08.01.
2
Superion(®) InterSpinous Spacer for treatment of moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: durable three-year results of a randomized controlled trial.用于治疗中度退行性腰椎管狭窄症的Superion（®）椎间融合器：一项随机对照试验的三年长期结果
J Pain Res. 2015 Oct 3;8:657-62. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S92633. eCollection 2015.
3
Superion interspinous process spacer for intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate lumbar spinal stenosis: two-year results from a randomized controlled FDA-IDE pivotal trial.用于中度腰椎管狭窄继发间歇性神经源性跛行的Superion棘突间撑开器：一项FDA-IDE随机对照关键试验的两年结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Mar 1;40(5):275-82. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000735.
4
Cost-effectiveness and Safety of Interspinous Process Decompression (Superion).棘突间减压术（Superion）的成本效益和安全性
Pain Med. 2019 Dec 1;20(Suppl 2):S2-S8. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz245.
5
Superion Interspinous Spacer Treatment of Moderate Spinal Stenosis: 4-Year Results.Superion椎间融合器治疗中度腰椎管狭窄症：4年随访结果
World Neurosurg. 2017 Aug;104:279-283. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.163. Epub 2017 May 4.
6
Interspinous spacer implant in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: preliminary results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.腰椎管狭窄症患者棘突间撑开器植入术：一项多中心、随机、对照试验的初步结果
Pain Res Treat. 2012;2012:823509. doi: 10.1155/2012/823509. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
7
Rationale, design and clinical performance of the Superion® Interspinous Spacer: a minimally invasive implant for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.Superion® 棘突间撑开器的原理、设计和临床性能：一种用于治疗腰椎管狭窄症的微创植入物。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2011 Jul;8(4):419-26. doi: 10.1586/erd.11.24.
8
Comparison of two FDA-approved interspinous spacers for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: Superion versus X-STOP-a meta-analysis from five randomized controlled trial studies.两种经美国食品药品监督管理局（FDA）批准用于治疗腰椎管狭窄症的棘突间撑开器的比较：Superion与X-STOP——来自五项随机对照试验研究的荟萃分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Mar 2;13(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0742-0.
9
Cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: Conservative care, laminectomy, and the Superion interspinous spacer.腰椎管狭窄症三种治疗策略的成本效益：保守治疗、椎板切除术和Superion椎间融合器。
Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Jul 9;9:28. doi: 10.14444/2028. eCollection 2015.
10
Biomechanics and Mechanism of Action of Indirect Lumbar Decompression and the Evolution of a Stand-alone Spinous Process Spacer.间接腰椎减压的生物力学和作用机制以及独立棘突间撑开器的演变。
Pain Med. 2019 Dec 1;20(Suppl 2):S14-S22. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz129.
本文引用的文献
1
Lumbar stenosis surgery: Spine surgeons not insurance companies should decide when enough is better than too much.腰椎管狭窄症手术：应由脊柱外科医生而非保险公司来决定何时“足够好”优于“过度治疗”。
Surg Neurol Int. 2017 Oct 10;8:247. doi: 10.4103/sni.sni_300_17. eCollection 2017.
2
Five-year durability of stand-alone interspinous process decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症单纯棘突间减压的五年疗效持久性
Clin Interv Aging. 2017 Sep 6;12:1409-1417. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S143503. eCollection 2017.
3
Superion Interspinous Spacer Treatment of Moderate Spinal Stenosis: 4-Year Results.Superion椎间融合器治疗中度腰椎管狭窄症：4年随访结果
World Neurosurg. 2017 Aug;104:279-283. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.163. Epub 2017 May 4.
4
Commentary on: A randomized controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (Forsth P, Ólafsson G, Carlsson T, Frost A, Borgström F, Fritzell P, . N Eng J Med 2016;374:1414-23).关于《腰椎管狭窄症融合手术的随机对照试验》的述评（福尔斯 P、奥拉夫松 G、卡尔松 T、弗罗斯特 A、博格斯特伦 F、弗里茨尔 P 等。《新英格兰医学杂志》2016 年；374:1414 - 23）。
Surg Neurol Int. 2016 Sep 22;7(Suppl 25):S641-S643. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.191060. eCollection 2016.
5
Cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: Conservative care, laminectomy, and the Superion interspinous spacer.腰椎管狭窄症三种治疗策略的成本效益：保守治疗、椎板切除术和Superion椎间融合器。
Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Jul 9;9:28. doi: 10.14444/2028. eCollection 2015.
6
Effectiveness of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腰椎管狭窄症手术的有效性：一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 30;10(3):e0122800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122800. eCollection 2015.
7
Neurosurgery: A profession or a technical trade?神经外科：一种职业还是一门技术行当？
Surg Neurol Int. 2014 Nov 29;5:168. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.145932. eCollection 2014.
8
Superion interspinous process spacer for intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate lumbar spinal stenosis: two-year results from a randomized controlled FDA-IDE pivotal trial.用于中度腰椎管狭窄继发间歇性神经源性跛行的Superion棘突间撑开器：一项FDA-IDE随机对照关键试验的两年结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Mar 1;40(5):275-82. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000735.
9
Is surgery more effective than non-surgical treatment for spinal stenosis, and which non-surgical treatment is more effective? A systematic review.手术治疗与非手术治疗相比，对于椎管狭窄症哪个更有效？系统评价。
Physiotherapy. 2013 Mar;99(1):12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
10
Surgery versus conservative treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.手术与保守治疗对症状性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较：一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Sep 15;36(20):E1335-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820c97b1.
Zotero 插件