Suppr超能文献

非符号和符号两位数加法的共享和独特神经回路。

Shared and distinct neural circuitry for nonsymbolic and symbolic double-digit addition.

机构信息

Psychology Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Mar;40(4):1328-1343. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24452. Epub 2018 Dec 12.

Abstract

Symbolic arithmetic is a complex, uniquely human ability that is acquired through direct instruction. In contrast, the capacity to mentally add and subtract nonsymbolic quantities such as dot arrays emerges without instruction and can be seen in human infants and nonhuman animals. One possibility is that the mental manipulation of nonsymbolic arrays provides a critical scaffold for developing symbolic arithmetic abilities. To explore this hypothesis, we examined whether there is a shared neural basis for nonsymbolic and symbolic double-digit addition. In parallel, we asked whether there are brain regions that are associated with nonsymbolic and symbolic addition independently. First, relative to visually matched control tasks, we found that both nonsymbolic and symbolic addition elicited greater neural signal in the bilateral intraparietal sulcus (IPS), bilateral inferior temporal gyrus, and the right superior parietal lobule. Subsequent representational similarity analyses revealed that the neural similarity between nonsymbolic and symbolic addition was stronger relative to the similarity between each addition condition and its visually matched control task, but only in the bilateral IPS. These findings suggest that the IPS is involved in arithmetic calculation independent of stimulus format.

摘要

符号运算(Symbolic arithmetic)是一种复杂的、人类特有的能力,它是通过直接指导获得的。相比之下,对非符号数量(如点数组)进行心理加和减的能力是无需指导即可获得的,并且在人类婴儿和非人类动物中都可以看到。一种可能性是,对非符号数组的心理操作为发展符号运算能力提供了重要的支撑。为了探究这一假设,我们考察了非符号和符号两位数加法是否具有共同的神经基础。同时,我们还研究了是否存在与非符号和符号加法分别相关的大脑区域。首先,与视觉匹配的控制任务相比,我们发现非符号和符号加法都在双侧顶内沟(IPS)、双侧颞下回和右侧顶上小叶中引起了更大的神经信号。随后的代表性相似性分析表明,非符号和符号加法之间的神经相似性相对于每个加法条件与其视觉匹配控制任务之间的相似性更强,但仅在双侧 IPS 中。这些发现表明,IPS 参与了算术计算,而与刺激格式无关。

相似文献

8
Network topology of symbolic and nonsymbolic number comparison.符号与非符号数字比较的网络拓扑结构。
Netw Neurosci. 2020 Aug 1;4(3):714-745. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00144. eCollection 2020.
10
Ordinality and the nature of symbolic numbers.序数和符号数的性质。
J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 23;33(43):17052-61. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1775-13.2013.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Characterizing the neural coding of symbolic quantities.刻画符号数量的神经编码。
Neuroimage. 2018 Sep;178:503-518. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.062. Epub 2018 May 30.
3
Is There Really an Evolved Capacity for Number?是否真有一种进化而来的数字能力?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Jun;21(6):409-424. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.03.005.
7
Distinct Neural Signatures for Very Small and Very Large Numerosities.非常小和非常大数量的独特神经特征。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jan 31;11:21. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00021. eCollection 2017.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验