Suppr超能文献

初次胃旁路和胃袖状切除术后原发性和继发性(无)应答缺乏标准定义:系统评价。

Lack of Standard Definitions of Primary and Secondary (Non)responders After Primary Gastric Bypass and Gastric Sleeve: a Systematic Review.

机构信息

Máxima Medical Center, Eindhoven/Veldhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2019 Feb;29(2):691-697. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3610-4.

Abstract

Lack of standard definitions of primary and secondary (non)responders after RYGB and SG makes it impossible to compare the literature. The aim was to analyze the different definitions used. MEDLINE® was searched for literature published between 01-07-2014 and 01-07-2017 concerning (1) patients who received a primary RYGB or SG and (2) the outcomes of primary and secondary (non)responders. One hundred twelve out of 650 papers were eligible. Forty out of 47 papers described a definition of weight loss success. Sixty-seven out of 112 papers mentioned weight loss failure of which 42 described a definition, in total 23 different definitions. Weight regain was mentioned in 77 papers; only 21 papers provided a definition. The recent literature regarding definitions of these outcomes is highly inconsistent. To compare the literature international consensus is required.

摘要

RYGB 和 SG 后原发性和继发性(无)应答者缺乏标准定义,使得文献无法进行比较。目的是分析使用的不同定义。对 2014 年 7 月 1 日至 2017 年 7 月 1 日发表的有关(1)接受原发性 RYGB 或 SG 的患者和(2)原发性和继发性(无)应答者结局的文献进行了 MEDLINE®检索。从 650 篇论文中筛选出 112 篇符合条件的论文。47 篇论文中有 40 篇描述了体重减轻成功的定义。112 篇论文中有 67 篇提到了体重减轻失败,其中 42 篇描述了定义,总共 23 个不同的定义。有 77 篇论文提到了体重反弹,只有 21 篇论文提供了定义。关于这些结果的定义,最近的文献非常不一致。需要国际共识来比较文献。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验