• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有腹盆腔手术史患者结肠镜检查肠道准备质量:回顾性队列研究

Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in Patients with a History of Abdomino-Pelvic Surgery: Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Kim Bun, Kim Byung Chang, Kim Jeongseon, Oh Hyun Jin, Ryu Kum Hei, Park Bum Joon, Sohn Dae Kyung, Hong Chang Won, Han Kyung Su

机构信息

Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

Center for Cancer Prevention and Detection, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2019 Jan;60(1):73-78. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.1.73.

DOI:10.3349/ymj.2019.60.1.73
PMID:30554493
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6298899/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Prior abdomino-pelvic (AP) surgery makes colonoscopy difficult and can affect bowel preparation quality. However, bowel preparation quality has been found to vary according to prior AP surgery type. We examined the relationship of prior AP surgery type with bowel preparation quality in a large-scale retrospective cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the health screening cohort of the National Cancer Center, 12881 participants who underwent screening or surveillance colonoscopy between June 2007 and December 2014 were included. Personal data were collected by reviewing patient medical records. Bowel preparation quality was assessed using the Aronchick scale and was categorized as satisfactory for excellent to good bowel preparation or unsatisfactory for fair to inadequate bowel preparation.

RESULTS

A total of 1557 (12.1%) participants had a history of AP surgery. The surgery types were colorectal surgery (n=44), gastric/small intestinal surgery (n=125), appendectomy/peritoneum/laparotomy (n=476), cesarean section (n=278), uterus/ovarian surgery (n=317), kidney/bladder/prostate surgery (n=19), or liver/pancreatobiliary surgery (n=96). The proportion of satisfactory bowel preparations was 70.7%. In multivariate analysis, unsatisfactory bowel preparation was related to gastric/small intestinal surgery (odds ratio=1.764, 95% confidence interval=1.230-2.532, =0.002). However, the other surgery types did not affect bowel preparation quality. Current smoking, diabetes, and high body mass index were risk factors of unacceptable bowel preparation.

CONCLUSION

Only gastric/small intestinal surgery was a potential risk factor for poor bowel preparation. Further research on patients with a history of gastric/small intestinal surgery to determine appropriate methods for adequate bowel preparation is mandatory.

摘要

目的

既往腹盆腔(AP)手术会使结肠镜检查变得困难,并可能影响肠道准备质量。然而,已发现肠道准备质量会因既往AP手术类型的不同而有所差异。我们在一个大规模回顾性队列中研究了既往AP手术类型与肠道准备质量之间的关系。

材料与方法

纳入国家癌症中心健康筛查队列中在2007年6月至2014年12月期间接受筛查或监测结肠镜检查的12881名参与者。通过查阅患者病历收集个人数据。使用阿隆奇克量表评估肠道准备质量,并将其分类为肠道准备良好至优秀为满意,肠道准备一般至不足为不满意。

结果

共有1557名(12.1%)参与者有AP手术史。手术类型包括结直肠手术(n = 44)、胃/小肠手术(n = 125)、阑尾切除术/腹膜/剖腹术(n = 476)、剖宫产(n = 278)、子宫/卵巢手术(n = 317)、肾脏/膀胱/前列腺手术(n = 19)或肝脏/胰胆手术(n = 96)。满意的肠道准备比例为70.7%。在多变量分析中,不满意的肠道准备与胃/小肠手术相关(比值比 = 1.764,95%置信区间 = 1.230 - 2.532,P = 0.002)。然而,其他手术类型并不影响肠道准备质量。当前吸烟、糖尿病和高体重指数是肠道准备不合格的危险因素。

结论

只有胃/小肠手术是肠道准备不佳的潜在危险因素。必须对有胃/小肠手术史的患者进行进一步研究,以确定适当的充分肠道准备方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c46/6298899/a0a02f057f12/ymj-60-73-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c46/6298899/a0a02f057f12/ymj-60-73-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c46/6298899/a0a02f057f12/ymj-60-73-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in Patients with a History of Abdomino-Pelvic Surgery: Retrospective Cohort Study.有腹盆腔手术史患者结肠镜检查肠道准备质量:回顾性队列研究
Yonsei Med J. 2019 Jan;60(1):73-78. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.1.73.
2
Impact of Resected Colon Site on Quality of Bowel Preparation in Patients Who Underwent Prior Colorectal Resection.既往接受过结直肠切除术的患者中,切除结肠部位对肠道准备质量的影响。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Aug;27(4):290-294. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000425.
3
Impact of previous gastric or colonic resection on polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for colonoscopy.既往胃或结肠切除术对结肠镜检查用聚乙二醇肠道准备的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Jun;26(6):1554-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2068-4. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
4
Risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation: a validated predictive score.肠道准备不充分的风险因素:经验证的预测评分。
Endoscopy. 2017 Jun;49(6):536-543. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-101683. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
5
[Factors related to a suboptimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy].[与结肠镜检查肠道准备不佳相关的因素]
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2015 Mar;45(1):24-30.
6
Predicting inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in participants receiving split-dose bowel preparation: development and validation of a prediction score.预测接受分次肠道准备的参与者结肠镜检查肠道准备不足:预测评分的制定和验证。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):665-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.066. Epub 2015 Jan 17.
7
Predictors of Inadequate Inpatient Colonoscopy Preparation and Its Association with Hospital Length of Stay and Costs.住院结肠镜检查准备不充分的预测因素及其与住院时间和费用的关联。
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Nov;60(11):3482-90. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3761-2. Epub 2015 Jun 21.
8
Patients with History of Colonoscopy Are Less Likely to Achieve High Quality Preparation After Implementing Split-Dose Bowel Preparation.有结肠镜检查史的患者在采用分剂量肠道准备后不太可能实现高质量的肠道准备。
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2017 Apr-Jun;80(2):257-261.
9
Association between body mass index and quality of split bowel preparation.体重指数与分体肠准备质量的关系。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Nov;11(11):1478-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.05.037. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
10
Online Educational Video Improves Bowel Preparation and Reduces the Need for Repeat Colonoscopy Within Three Years.在线教育视频可改善肠道准备并减少三年内重复结肠镜检查的需求。
Am J Med. 2016 Nov;129(11):1219.e1-1219.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of oral sodium phosphate tablets and polyethylene glycol lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.口服磷酸钠片与聚乙二醇灌洗液用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的比较:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 26;10:1088630. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1088630. eCollection 2023.
2
Factors affecting the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy in hard-to-prepare patients: Evidence from the literature.影响结肠镜检查困难患者肠道准备质量的因素:来自文献的证据。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar 21;29(11):1685-1707. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i11.1685.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis: Sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate as bowel preparation for colonoscopy.系统评价与荟萃分析:以比沙可啶钠与枸橼酸镁作为结肠镜检查的肠道准备用药
United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Nov;5(7):917-943. doi: 10.1177/2050640616684696. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
2
Frequency and risk factors of colorectal adenoma in patients with early gastric cancer.早期胃癌患者结直肠腺瘤的发生率及危险因素
Intern Med J. 2017 Oct;47(10):1184-1189. doi: 10.1111/imj.13542.
3
Comparison of Two Intensive Bowel Cleansing Regimens in Patients With Previous Poor Bowel Preparation: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Risk Factors for Inadequate Bowel Preparation During Colonoscopy in Nigerian Patients.
尼日利亚患者结肠镜检查期间肠道准备不充分的危险因素
Cureus. 2021 Aug 13;13(8):e17145. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17145. eCollection 2021 Aug.
4
Predictive factors for inadequate bowel preparation using low-volume polyethylene glycol (PEG) plus ascorbic acid for an outpatient colonoscopy.低容量聚乙二醇(PEG)加抗坏血酸用于门诊结肠镜检查时肠道准备不充分的预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 23;9(1):19715. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56107-5.
既往肠道准备不佳患者两种强化肠道清洁方案的比较:一项随机对照研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jun;112(6):951-958. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.53. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
4
Comparable Efficacy of a 1-L PEG and Ascorbic Acid Solution Administered with Bisacodyl versus a 2-L PEG and Ascorbic Acid Solution for Colonoscopy Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized and Investigator-Blinded Trial.与2升聚乙二醇(PEG)和抗坏血酸溶液相比,1升PEG与抗坏血酸溶液联合比沙可啶用于结肠镜检查准备的疗效相当:一项前瞻性、随机且研究者设盲的试验
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 2;11(9):e0162051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162051. eCollection 2016.
5
Constipation, fiber intake and non-compliance contribute to inadequate colonoscopy bowel preparation: a prospective cohort study.便秘、纤维摄入量及不依从性导致结肠镜检查肠道准备不充分:一项前瞻性队列研究
J Dig Dis. 2016 Jul;17(7):458-63. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12376.
6
Enhanced instructions improve the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.增强指导可提高结肠镜检查的肠道准备质量:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jan;85(1):90-97.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 May 14.
7
Complete colonoscopy: impact of patients' demographics and anthropometry on caecal intubation time.全结肠镜检查:患者人口统计学特征和人体测量学对盲肠插管时间的影响
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr 7;3(1):e000076. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2016-000076. eCollection 2016.
8
Determinants of Bowel Preparation Quality and Its Association With Adenoma Detection: A Prospective Colonoscopy Study.肠道准备质量的决定因素及其与腺瘤检出的关联:一项前瞻性结肠镜检查研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jan;95(2):e2251. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002251.
9
Comparison between different colon cleansing products for screening colonoscopy. A noninferiority trial in population-based screening programs in Italy.不同结肠清洁剂在筛查结肠镜检查中的比较。意大利基于人群的筛查计划中的非劣效性试验。
Endoscopy. 2016 Mar;48(3):223-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1569574. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
10
Sodium phosphate versus polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy bowel preparation: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.结肠镜检查肠道准备中磷酸钠与聚乙二醇的比较:随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):4033-41. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4716-6. Epub 2015 Dec 17.