Zawawi Faisal, Cushing Sharon L, James Adrian L, Gordon Karen A, Papsin Blake C
Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children. Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto. Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children. Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto. Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Archie's Cochlear Implant Laboratory, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jan;116:164-167. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.10.031. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
To determine if proximal fixation of the cochlear implant helps reduce the rate of straight electrode array extrusion/migration.
Records of 278 children implanted with a straight electrode at a tertiary pediatric hospital from 1990 to 2017 were reviewed. Demographics, operative reports, electrode type, radiological studies and audiological assessments including impedance and stimulation parameters were collected. Significant abnormalities were defined by >75% change in impedance relative to 1 month post-implant values. The main outcome is the incidence of electrode extrusion based on significant changes in impedance and comparative radiological imaging looking for electrode extrusion.
During this period, straight electrodes were chosen infrequently (298/1781 devices implanted (16.73%) in 278 children). They were used prior to the introduction of pre-curved electrodes (153/298) and subsequently for hearing preservation (33/298) and in anomalous cochleae (48/298). Most recently they were used in a comparative study of children receiving one perimodiolar and one straight array (64/298). All electrodes were proximally fixated with a suture around the incus buttress (Ned's knot). None of the 298 electrodes required repositioning. Comparative radiographs after long duration implant use were available in 72 of 298 devices (24.2%) revealing no changes in electrode position. Significant impedance changes (>75%), indicative of open circuits, were noted in 6/298 devices (2%); ≤2 electrodes at various array positions were affected in each child. In one case, repositioning of the receiver/stimulator may have damaged the electrodes as they exited the device body but no changes in electrode position were evident on the post-repositioning radiograph.
Extrusion of straight electrodes is a recognized complication of cochlear implant surgery but was not observed in our cohort with proximal electrode fixation.
确定人工耳蜗的近端固定是否有助于降低直电极阵列挤出/移位的发生率。
回顾了1990年至2017年在一家三级儿科医院为278名儿童植入直电极的记录。收集了人口统计学资料、手术报告、电极类型、放射学研究以及包括阻抗和刺激参数在内的听力学评估结果。显著异常定义为相对于植入后1个月的值,阻抗变化>75%。主要结局是基于阻抗的显著变化和寻找电极挤出的对比放射影像学检查来确定电极挤出的发生率。
在此期间,直电极的选择频率较低(278名儿童中植入298个装置,占16.73%)。它们在预弯电极引入之前被使用(153/298),随后用于听力保留(33/298)和异常耳蜗(48/298)。最近,它们被用于一项对接受一个环模电极和一个直电极阵列的儿童的对比研究中(64/298)。所有电极均在砧骨支柱周围用缝线进行近端固定(奈德结)。298个电极中无一需要重新定位。298个装置中有72个(24.2%)在长期植入后有对比X线片,显示电极位置无变化。298个装置中有6个(2%)出现了显著的阻抗变化(>75%),提示开路;每个儿童的不同阵列位置有≤2个电极受到影响。在1例中,接收器/刺激器的重新定位可能在电极穿出装置主体时损坏了电极,但重新定位后的X线片上未发现电极位置有明显变化。
直电极挤出是人工耳蜗植入手术中一种公认的并发症,但在我们近端电极固定的队列中未观察到。