Malejko Kathrin, Neff Dominik, Brown Rebecca, Plener Paul L, Bonenberger Martina, Abler Birgit, Graf Heiko
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 3;9:653. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00653. eCollection 2018.
Humans engage in social interactions and have a fundamental need and motivation to establish and maintain social connections. Neuroimaging studies particularly focused on the neural substrates of social exclusion in healthy subjects (HC), borderline personality disorder (BPD), and major depression (MD). However, there is evidence regarding neural alterations also during social inclusion in BPD that we intended to elucidate in our study. Considering that patients with BPD often have comorbid MD, we investigated patients with BPD, and comorbid MD, patients with MD without BPD, and a sample of HC. By investigating these two clinical samples within one study design, we attempted to disentangle potential confounds arising by psychiatric disorder or medication and to relate neural alterations under social inclusion specifically to BPD. We investigated 48 females (15 BPD and MD, 16 MD, and 17 HC) aged between 18 and 40 years by fMRI (3T), using the established cyberball paradigm with social exclusion, inclusion, and passive watching conditions. Significant group-by-condition interaction effects ( < 0.05, FWE-corrected on cluster level) were observed within the dorsolateral (dlPFC) and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), the temporo-parietal junction (TPJ), the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), and the precuneus. Comparisons of estimated neural activations revealed that significant interaction effects were related to a relative increase in neural activations during social inclusion in BPD. In detail, we observed a significant increase in differential (social inclusion vs. passive watching) neural activation within the dmPFC and the PCC in BPD compared to both, MD and HC. However, significant interaction effects within the dlPFC and the TPJ could not specifically be linked to BPD considering that they did not differ significantly between the two clinical groups in comparisons. Our study supports previous results on effects of social and inclusion in BPD, and provides further evidence regarding disorder specific neural alterations in BPD for brain regions associated with self-referential and mentalizing processes during social inclusion.
人类参与社会互动,并且有着建立和维持社会联系的基本需求与动机。神经影像学研究特别关注健康受试者(HC)、边缘型人格障碍(BPD)和重度抑郁症(MD)中社会排斥的神经基础。然而,有证据表明在BPD患者的社会接纳过程中也存在神经改变,我们打算在研究中对此进行阐明。鉴于BPD患者常伴有MD,我们对BPD伴MD患者、无BPD的MD患者以及HC样本进行了研究。通过在一个研究设计中调查这两个临床样本,我们试图厘清由精神疾病或药物引起的潜在混杂因素,并将社会接纳状态下的神经改变具体与BPD联系起来。我们使用功能磁共振成像(3T)对48名年龄在18至40岁之间的女性(15名BPD伴MD患者、16名MD患者和17名HC)进行了研究,采用既定的网络球范式,设置社会排斥、社会接纳和被动观看条件。在背外侧前额叶皮质(dlPFC)、背内侧前额叶皮质(dmPFC)、颞顶联合区(TPJ)、后扣带回皮质(PCC)和楔前叶观察到显著的组间条件交互作用效应(<0.05,在簇水平上进行FWE校正)。对估计的神经激活进行比较后发现,显著的交互作用效应与BPD患者在社会接纳过程中神经激活的相对增加有关。具体而言,与MD患者和HC患者相比,我们观察到BPD患者的dmPFC和PCC内差异(社会接纳与被动观看)神经激活显著增加。然而,考虑到在比较中两个临床组之间dlPFC和TPJ内的显著交互作用效应没有显著差异,所以无法将其具体与BPD联系起来。我们的研究支持了先前关于BPD中社会接纳影响的结果,并为BPD患者在社会接纳过程中与自我参照和心理化过程相关脑区的特定神经改变提供了进一步证据。