Suppr超能文献

边缘型人格障碍的可分析变异:神经影像学研究的荟萃分析。

Parsing variability in borderline personality disorder: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

机构信息

Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

Transl Psychiatry. 2021 May 24;11(1):314. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01446-z.

Abstract

Though a plethora of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies explored the neurobiological underpinnings of borderline personality disorder (BPD), findings across different tasks were divergent. We conducted a systematic review and activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis on the fMRI studies conducted in BPD patients compared to healthy controls (HC). We systematically searched PubMed and PsychINFO from inception until July 9th 2020 using combinations of database-specific terms like 'fMRI', 'Neuroimaging', 'borderline'. Eligible studies employed task-based fMRI of the brain in participants of any age diagnosed with BPD compared to HC, during any behavioral task and providing a direct contrast between the groups. From 762 entries, we inspected 92 reports full-texts and included 52 studies (describing 54 experiments). Across all experiments, the HC > BPD and BPD > HC meta-analyses did not yield any cluster of significant convergence of differences. Analyses restricted to studies of emotion processing revealed two significant clusters of activation in the bilateral hippocampal/amygdala complex and anterior cingulate for the BPD > HC meta-analysis. Fail-safe N and single study sensitivity analysis suggested significant findings were not robust. For the subgroup of emotional processing experiments, on a restricted number of experiments providing results for each group separately, another meta-analysis method (difference of convergence) showed a significant cluster in the insula/inferior frontal gyrus for the HC > BPD contrast. No consistent pattern of alteration in brain activity for BPD was evidenced suggesting substantial heterogeneity of processes and populations studied. A pattern of amygdala dysfunction emerged across emotion processing tasks, indicating a potential pathophysiological mechanism that could be transdiagnostic.

摘要

尽管大量功能磁共振成像 (fMRI) 研究探索了边缘型人格障碍 (BPD) 的神经生物学基础,但不同任务的研究结果存在差异。我们对 BPD 患者与健康对照者 (HC) 进行的 fMRI 研究进行了系统回顾和激活似然估计 (ALE) 荟萃分析。我们系统地检索了从成立到 2020 年 7 月 9 日在 PubMed 和 PsychINFO 上的文献,使用了数据库特定术语的组合,如“fMRI”、“神经影像学”、“borderline”。合格的研究在任何年龄的参与者中进行了基于任务的 fMRI 脑研究,这些参与者被诊断为 BPD 并与 HC 进行比较,在任何行为任务中进行,并在组间进行直接对比。从 762 项研究中,我们检查了 92 份报告的全文,并纳入了 52 项研究(描述了 54 项实验)。在所有实验中,HC>BPD 和 BPD>HC 的荟萃分析均未产生任何差异显著汇聚的簇。对情绪处理研究的分析显示,在双侧海马体/杏仁核复合体和前扣带回中,BPD>HC 的荟萃分析有两个显著的激活簇。失效安全 N 和单个研究敏感性分析表明,显著的发现并不稳健。对于情绪处理实验的亚组,在为每组分别提供结果的有限数量的实验中,另一种荟萃分析方法(汇聚差异)显示,HC>BPD 对比的脑岛/额下回有一个显著的簇。没有证据表明 BPD 的大脑活动有一致的改变模式,这表明研究的过程和人群存在很大的异质性。在情绪处理任务中出现了杏仁核功能障碍的模式,表明可能存在跨诊断的潜在病理生理机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be5/8144551/6f81973f20a2/41398_2021_1446_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验