Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 May 24;11(1):314. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01446-z.
Though a plethora of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies explored the neurobiological underpinnings of borderline personality disorder (BPD), findings across different tasks were divergent. We conducted a systematic review and activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis on the fMRI studies conducted in BPD patients compared to healthy controls (HC). We systematically searched PubMed and PsychINFO from inception until July 9th 2020 using combinations of database-specific terms like 'fMRI', 'Neuroimaging', 'borderline'. Eligible studies employed task-based fMRI of the brain in participants of any age diagnosed with BPD compared to HC, during any behavioral task and providing a direct contrast between the groups. From 762 entries, we inspected 92 reports full-texts and included 52 studies (describing 54 experiments). Across all experiments, the HC > BPD and BPD > HC meta-analyses did not yield any cluster of significant convergence of differences. Analyses restricted to studies of emotion processing revealed two significant clusters of activation in the bilateral hippocampal/amygdala complex and anterior cingulate for the BPD > HC meta-analysis. Fail-safe N and single study sensitivity analysis suggested significant findings were not robust. For the subgroup of emotional processing experiments, on a restricted number of experiments providing results for each group separately, another meta-analysis method (difference of convergence) showed a significant cluster in the insula/inferior frontal gyrus for the HC > BPD contrast. No consistent pattern of alteration in brain activity for BPD was evidenced suggesting substantial heterogeneity of processes and populations studied. A pattern of amygdala dysfunction emerged across emotion processing tasks, indicating a potential pathophysiological mechanism that could be transdiagnostic.
尽管大量功能磁共振成像 (fMRI) 研究探索了边缘型人格障碍 (BPD) 的神经生物学基础,但不同任务的研究结果存在差异。我们对 BPD 患者与健康对照者 (HC) 进行的 fMRI 研究进行了系统回顾和激活似然估计 (ALE) 荟萃分析。我们系统地检索了从成立到 2020 年 7 月 9 日在 PubMed 和 PsychINFO 上的文献,使用了数据库特定术语的组合,如“fMRI”、“神经影像学”、“borderline”。合格的研究在任何年龄的参与者中进行了基于任务的 fMRI 脑研究,这些参与者被诊断为 BPD 并与 HC 进行比较,在任何行为任务中进行,并在组间进行直接对比。从 762 项研究中,我们检查了 92 份报告的全文,并纳入了 52 项研究(描述了 54 项实验)。在所有实验中,HC>BPD 和 BPD>HC 的荟萃分析均未产生任何差异显著汇聚的簇。对情绪处理研究的分析显示,在双侧海马体/杏仁核复合体和前扣带回中,BPD>HC 的荟萃分析有两个显著的激活簇。失效安全 N 和单个研究敏感性分析表明,显著的发现并不稳健。对于情绪处理实验的亚组,在为每组分别提供结果的有限数量的实验中,另一种荟萃分析方法(汇聚差异)显示,HC>BPD 对比的脑岛/额下回有一个显著的簇。没有证据表明 BPD 的大脑活动有一致的改变模式,这表明研究的过程和人群存在很大的异质性。在情绪处理任务中出现了杏仁核功能障碍的模式,表明可能存在跨诊断的潜在病理生理机制。