Boone Kiran, Babinski Dara, Kujawa Autumn, Pegg Samantha, Sharp Carla
University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Personal Ment Health. 2025 Feb;19(1):e70000. doi: 10.1002/pmh.70000.
More work is needed to establish the validity of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Acceptance of the AMPD as the primary model of personality disorder requires identifying neurocognitive validators of AMPD-defined personality functioning and demonstrating superiority of the AMPD over the traditional categorical model of personality disorder. It is also important to establish the utility of the AMPD in a developmental context given evidence that personality disorder emerges in adolescence. We assessed the incremental validity of AMPD-defined level of personality functioning (LPF) versus borderline personality features (BPF) in explaining alterations in neural processing of social acceptance feedback in early adolescent girls. One hundred nine girls (M = 12.21, SD = 1.21; N = 79 with a psychiatric history) completed a computerized peer interaction task to elicit neural response to social acceptance feedback via electroencephalogram (EEG). Subjects or caregivers reported adolescent psychopathology. In hierarchical regressions controlling for neural response to social rejection and internalizing and externalizing symptoms, LPF incremented BPF and all other covariates in predicting response to social acceptance, but BPF did not. Higher LPF impairment was associated with enhanced reactivity to social acceptance (St.b = 0.274, p = 0.018). LPF appears to provide additional information about neural response to social reward in early adolescence beyond that provided by borderline personality features. These findings add to an emerging literature demonstrating the validity and superiority of the AMPD and help build the rationale for moving toward the AMPD as the primary model of personality disorder classification.
需要开展更多工作来确立《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM-5)中人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)的有效性。要将AMPD作为人格障碍的主要模型接受,就需要确定AMPD所定义的人格功能的神经认知验证指标,并证明AMPD优于传统的人格障碍分类模型。鉴于有证据表明人格障碍在青春期出现,在发育背景下确立AMPD的效用也很重要。我们评估了AMPD所定义的人格功能水平(LPF)与边缘型人格特征(BPF)在解释青春期早期女孩社会接纳反馈神经加工变化方面的增量效度。109名女孩(M = 12.21,SD = 1.21;79名有精神病史)完成了一项计算机化同伴互动任务,以通过脑电图(EEG)引出对社会接纳反馈的神经反应。受试者或照料者报告了青少年精神病理学情况。在控制对社会排斥的神经反应以及内化和外化症状的分层回归分析中,LPF在预测对社会接纳的反应方面比BPF和所有其他协变量有增量,但BPF没有。更高的LPF损害与对社会接纳的反应性增强相关(标准系数b = 0.274,p = 0.018)。LPF似乎能提供超出边缘型人格特征所提供的关于青春期早期对社会奖励神经反应的额外信息。这些发现为越来越多证明AMPD有效性和优越性的文献增添了内容,并有助于为将AMPD作为人格障碍分类的主要模型奠定理论基础。