• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新的工作学术质量工具(AQ@workT),用于评估意大利学术环境中的工作生活质量。

A New Academic Quality at Work Tool (AQ@workT) to Assess the Quality of Life at Work in the Italian Academic Context.

机构信息

Department of Human Sciences, University of Verona, Lungadige Porta Vittoria 17, 37129 Verona, Italy.

History, Society and Human Studies Department, University of Salento, Via di Valesio 24, 73100 Lecce, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 21;19(6):3724. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063724.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19063724
PMID:35329409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8955096/
Abstract

The present study provides evidence for a valid and reliable tool, the Academic Quality at Work Tool (AQ@workT), to investigate the quality of life at work in academics within the Italian university sector. The AQ@workT was developed by the QoL@Work research team, namely a group of expert academics in the field of work and organizational psychology affiliated with the Italian Association of Psychologists. The tool is grounded in the job demands-resources model and its psychometric properties were assessed in three studies comprising a wide sample of lecturers, researchers, and professors: a pilot study (N = 120), a calibration study (N = 1084), and a validation study (N = 1481). Reliability and content, construct, and nomological validity were supported, as well as measurement invariance across work role (researchers, associate professors, and full professors) and gender. Evidence from the present study shows that the AQ@workT represents a useful and reliable tool to assist university management to enhance quality of life, to manage work-related stress, and to mitigate the potential for harm to academics, particularly during a pandemic. Future studies, such as longitudinal tests of the AQ@workT, should test predictive validity among the variables in the tool.

摘要

本研究提供了证据,证明了一种有效的、可靠的工具,即学术工作质量工具(AQ@workT),可以用来调查意大利大学学术界工作者的生活质量。AQ@workT 是由 QoL@Work 研究团队开发的,该团队由工作和组织心理学领域的专家学者组成,隶属于意大利心理学家协会。该工具基于工作要求-资源模型,其心理测量学特性在三项研究中得到了评估,研究对象包括广泛的讲师、研究人员和教授样本:一项试点研究(N=120)、一项校准研究(N=1084)和一项验证研究(N=1481)。该工具的可靠性、内容、结构和效标效度得到了支持,同时还具有跨工作角色(研究人员、副教授和正教授)和性别的不变性。本研究的证据表明,AQ@workT 是一种有用且可靠的工具,可以帮助大学管理层提高生活质量、管理与工作相关的压力,并减轻对学术界人士的潜在伤害,特别是在大流行期间。未来的研究,如对 AQ@workT 的纵向测试,应该检验工具中变量的预测效度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e467/8955096/fd4f9db1c574/ijerph-19-03724-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e467/8955096/8d93c4906f59/ijerph-19-03724-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e467/8955096/fd4f9db1c574/ijerph-19-03724-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e467/8955096/8d93c4906f59/ijerph-19-03724-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e467/8955096/fd4f9db1c574/ijerph-19-03724-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A New Academic Quality at Work Tool (AQ@workT) to Assess the Quality of Life at Work in the Italian Academic Context.一种新的工作学术质量工具(AQ@workT),用于评估意大利学术环境中的工作生活质量。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 21;19(6):3724. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063724.
2
First validation of the technical and administrative staff quality of life at work tool (TASQ@work) in academia.学术界工作生活质量工具(TASQ@work)中技术和行政人员部分的首次验证。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 12;15:1346556. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1346556. eCollection 2024.
3
Not All Academics Are Alike: First Validation of the Academics' Quality of Life at Work Scale (AQoLW).并非所有学者都一样:学者工作生活质量量表(AQoLW)的首次验证
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 3;9:2408. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02408. eCollection 2018.
4
[Job satisfaction in an Italian university: difference between academic and technical-administrative staff].[意大利一所大学的工作满意度:学术人员与技术行政人员之间的差异]
G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2014 Jul-Sep;36(3):160-7.
5
Measuring subjective well-being from a multidimensional and temporal perspective: Italian adaptation of the I COPPE scale.从多维和时间的角度衡量主观幸福感:意大利版 I COPPE 量表的适应。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 May 8;16(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0916-9.
6
Validation of the Italian version of the abbreviated expanded prostate Cancer index composite (EPIC-26) in men with prostate Cancer.验证中文版简化扩展前列腺癌指数复合量表(EPIC-26)在前列腺癌患者中的适用性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Aug 29;17(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1214-x.
7
COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales is a brief, valid and reliable tool for assessing stress in patients seeking treatment.COMPI生育问题压力量表是一种用于评估寻求治疗的患者压力的简短、有效且可靠的工具。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Feb;32(2):375-382. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew315. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
8
The Relationship of Age with the Autism-Spectrum Quotient Scale in a Large Sample of Adults.大量成年样本中年龄与自闭症谱系商数量表的关系
Autism Adulthood. 2021 Jun 1;3(2):147-156. doi: 10.1089/aut.2020.0010. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
9
The adult carer quality of life questionnaire (AC-QoL): comparison with measures of burden and well-being, and Italian validation.成人照顾者生活质量问卷(AC-QoL):与负担和幸福感测量的比较,以及意大利验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 May;41(10):1207-1216. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1423519. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
10
Prevalence and health correlates of Onine Fatigue: A cross-sectional study on the Italian academic community during the COVID-19 pandemic.线上疲劳的流行率及其与健康的关联:COVID-19 大流行期间对意大利学术界的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 14;16(10):e0255181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255181. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating well-being and psychosocial risks in academia: Is management the "forgotten phase"?评估学术界的幸福感和社会心理风险:管理是“被遗忘的阶段”吗?
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 3;15:1349589. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1349589. eCollection 2024.
2
First validation of the technical and administrative staff quality of life at work tool (TASQ@work) in academia.学术界工作生活质量工具(TASQ@work)中技术和行政人员部分的首次验证。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 12;15:1346556. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1346556. eCollection 2024.
3
Social dimensions as resources in promoting academic well-being: the case study of the University of Foggia.

本文引用的文献

1
Shifting from face-to-face to online teaching during COVID-19: The role of university faculty achievement goals for attitudes towards this sudden change, and their relevance for burnout/engagement and student evaluations of teaching quality.在新冠疫情期间从面对面教学转向在线教学:大学教师的成就目标对其面对这一突然变化的态度所起的作用,以及这些目标与职业倦怠/投入度和学生对教学质量评估的相关性。
Comput Human Behav. 2021 May;118:106677. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106677. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
2
The challenges of COVID-19 for the well-being of academic staff.新冠疫情给学术人员福祉带来的挑战。
Occup Med (Lond). 2022 Jan 13;72(1):2-3. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqab007.
3
社会维度作为促进学术福祉的资源:福贾大学案例研究
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 28;15:1347532. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1347532. eCollection 2024.
4
The new normal of remote work: exploring individual and organizational factors affecting work-related outcomes and well-being in academia.远程工作的新常态:探索影响学术界工作相关成果和幸福感的个人及组织因素。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 12;15:1340094. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1340094. eCollection 2024.
Examining the Relationships Between Job Characteristics, Emotional Regulation and University Teachers' Well-Being: The Mediation of Emotional Regulation.
探究工作特征、情绪调节与大学教师幸福感之间的关系:情绪调节的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 28;11:1727. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01727. eCollection 2020.
4
What do we know about university academics' mental health? A systematic literature review.我们对大学教师的心理健康有哪些了解?一项系统文献综述。
Stress Health. 2020 Dec;36(5):563-585. doi: 10.1002/smi.2956. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
5
Analysis of Stress Factors for Female Professors at Online Universities.在线大学女教授的压力因素分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 24;17(8):2958. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082958.
6
Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing.每周至少花 120 分钟在大自然中与健康和幸福有关。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 13;9(1):7730. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44097-3.
7
Not All Academics Are Alike: First Validation of the Academics' Quality of Life at Work Scale (AQoLW).并非所有学者都一样:学者工作生活质量量表(AQoLW)的首次验证
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 3;9:2408. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02408. eCollection 2018.
8
New Technologies Smart, or Harm Work-Family Boundaries Management? Gender Differences in Conflict and Enrichment Using the JD-R Theory.新技术是助力智能管理,还是会破坏工作与家庭界限的管理?基于工作需求-资源理论探讨冲突与增益方面的性别差异
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 30;8:1070. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01070. eCollection 2017.
9
Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward.工作需求-资源理论:总结与展望。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2017 Jul;22(3):273-285. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000056. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
10
Users' Support as a Social Resource in Educational Services: Construct Validity and Measurement Invariance of the User-Initiated Support Scale (UISS).教育服务中作为社会资源的用户支持:用户发起支持量表(UISS)的结构效度和测量不变性
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 23;7:1248. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01248. eCollection 2016.