Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Int J Cancer. 2019 Jul 1;145(1):58-69. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32075. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
Ovarian cancer risk factors differ by histotype; however, within subtype, there is substantial variability in outcomes. We hypothesized that risk factor profiles may influence tumor aggressiveness, defined by time between diagnosis and death, independent of histology. Among 1.3 million women from 21 prospective cohorts, 4,584 invasive epithelial ovarian cancers were identified and classified as highly aggressive (death in <1 year, n = 864), very aggressive (death in 1 to < 3 years, n = 1,390), moderately aggressive (death in 3 to < 5 years, n = 639), and less aggressive (lived 5+ years, n = 1,691). Using competing risks Cox proportional hazards regression, we assessed heterogeneity of associations by tumor aggressiveness for all cases and among serous and endometrioid/clear cell tumors. Associations between parity (p = 0.01), family history of ovarian cancer (p = 0.02), body mass index (BMI; p ≤ 0.04) and smoking (p < 0.01) and ovarian cancer risk differed by aggressiveness. A first/single pregnancy, relative to nulliparity, was inversely associated with highly aggressive disease (HR: 0.72; 95% CI [0.58-0.88]), no association was observed for subsequent pregnancies (per pregnancy, 0.97 [0.92-1.02]). In contrast, first and subsequent pregnancies were similarly associated with less aggressive disease (0.87 for both). Family history of ovarian cancer was only associated with risk of less aggressive disease (1.94 [1.47-2.55]). High BMI (≥35 vs. 20 to < 25 kg/m , 1.93 [1.46-2.56] and current smoking (vs. never, 1.30 [1.07-1.57]) were associated with increased risk of highly aggressive disease. Results were similar within histotypes. Ovarian cancer risk factors may be directly associated with subtypes defined by tumor aggressiveness, rather than through differential effects on histology. Studies to assess biological pathways are warranted.
卵巢癌的危险因素因组织类型而异;然而,在亚组内,结局存在很大差异。我们假设,危险因素谱可能会影响肿瘤侵袭性,定义为从诊断到死亡的时间,而与组织学无关。在 21 个前瞻性队列的 130 万名女性中,确定并分类了 4584 例侵袭性上皮性卵巢癌,分为高度侵袭性(<1 年内死亡,n=864)、非常侵袭性(1-<3 年内死亡,n=1390)、中度侵袭性(3-<5 年内死亡,n=639)和低度侵袭性(生存时间≥5 年,n=1691)。使用竞争风险 Cox 比例风险回归,我们评估了所有病例以及浆液性和子宫内膜样/透明细胞肿瘤中肿瘤侵袭性的相关性异质性。与卵巢癌风险相关的因素包括生育情况(p=0.01)、卵巢癌家族史(p=0.02)、体重指数(BMI;p≤0.04)和吸烟(p<0.01),这些因素的相关性因侵袭性而异。与 nulliparity 相比,首次/单胎妊娠与高度侵袭性疾病呈负相关(HR:0.72;95%CI[0.58-0.88]),随后的妊娠无相关性(每次妊娠,0.97[0.92-1.02])。相比之下,首次和随后的妊娠与低度侵袭性疾病的相关性相似(两者均为 0.87)。卵巢癌家族史仅与低度侵袭性疾病的风险相关(1.94[1.47-2.55])。高 BMI(≥35 与 20-<25kg/m2,1.93[1.46-2.56])和当前吸烟(与从不吸烟相比,1.30[1.07-1.57])与高度侵袭性疾病的风险增加相关。在组织类型内,结果相似。卵巢癌危险因素可能与通过肿瘤侵袭性定义的亚型直接相关,而不是通过对组织学的不同影响。有必要进行评估生物途径的研究。