Kiff R S, Lomax J, Fowler L, Kingston R D, Hoare E M, Sykes P A
Department of Clinical Studies, Park Hospital, Davyhulme, Manchester.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1988 Sep;70(5):313-6.
The effect of either prophylactic antibiotic or wound antiseptic on bile bacteriology, wound and other postoperative sepsis has been studied in a controlled prospective randomised trial of 243 patients undergoing biliary surgery at a district general hospital. Wound infection rates were significantly less in patients given intravenous ceftriaxone (1%) at induction of anaesthesia when compared to povidone iodine sprayed into the wound at the completion of surgery (9%) (P = 0.02). In all but one patient infected wounds grew organisms identical to those cultured from the bile. There were also fewer chest and urinary infections in the ceftriaxone group but this was not statistically significant.
在一家地区综合医院对243例接受胆道手术的患者进行的一项对照前瞻性随机试验中,研究了预防性抗生素或伤口防腐剂对胆汁细菌学、伤口及其他术后败血症的影响。与手术结束时向伤口喷洒聚维酮碘(9%)相比,麻醉诱导时静脉注射头孢曲松的患者伤口感染率显著更低(1%)(P = 0.02)。除1例患者外,所有感染伤口培养出的细菌与胆汁中培养出的细菌相同。头孢曲松组的胸部和泌尿系统感染也较少,但无统计学意义。