• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cefoperazone compared with ampicillin plus tobramycin for severe biliary tract infections.头孢哌酮与氨苄西林加妥布霉素治疗严重胆道感染的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Aug;32(8):1231-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.32.8.1231.
2
Antibiotics in infections of the biliary tract.抗生素在胆道感染中的应用
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1987 Oct;165(4):285-92.
3
[Comparative clinical trial of cefoperazone versus ampicillin + tobramycin in severe bronchopulmonary and pleural infectious pathology].头孢哌酮与氨苄西林+妥布霉素治疗重症支气管肺和胸膜感染性病变的比较临床试验
Rev Pneumol Clin. 1985;41(3):205-11.
4
Prospective comparative trial of short course (four day) and continuous tobramycin in combination with cefoperazone or mezlocillin in febrile, granulocytopenic patients.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989 Oct;24(4):591-604. doi: 10.1093/jac/24.4.591.
5
Cefoperazone plus tobramycin versus ticarcillin plus tobramycin in febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients.
Am J Med. 1988 Jul 25;85(1A):31-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90172-6.
6
Broad spectrum penicillin as an adequate therapy for acute cholangitis.广谱青霉素作为急性胆管炎的充分治疗方法。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990 Oct;171(4):275-82.
7
Cefoperazone plus piperacillin versus mezlocillin plus tobramycin as empiric therapy for febrile episodes in neutropenic patients.
Am J Med. 1988 Jul 25;85(1A):36-43. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90173-8.
8
A randomized, controlled trial of cefoperazone vs. cefamandole-tobramycin in the treatment of putative, severe infections with gram-negative bacilli.
Rev Infect Dis. 1983 Mar-Apr;5 Suppl 1:S173-80. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.supplement_1.s173.
9
[Biliary excretion and clinical evaluation of cefoperazone in the biliary tract infections].
Jpn J Antibiot. 1986 Jul;39(7):1663-70.
10
[Multicenter study of cefoperazone in Austria].[头孢哌酮在奥地利的多中心研究]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 1985 Mar 15;135(5):123-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Beta lactam antibiotic monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside antibiotic combination therapy for sepsis.β-内酰胺类抗生素单药治疗与β-内酰胺类-氨基糖苷类抗生素联合治疗败血症的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 7;2014(1):CD003344. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003344.pub3.
2
Multicentre clinical trials in infectious diseases in Canada.加拿大传染病多中心临床试验。
Can J Infect Dis. 1992 Mar;3(2):55-6.
3
Beta lactam monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy for sepsis in immunocompetent patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.β-内酰胺类单药治疗与β-内酰胺类-氨基糖苷类联合治疗对免疫功能正常患者败血症的疗效:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ. 2004 Mar 20;328(7441):668. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38028.520995.63. Epub 2004 Mar 2.
4
Biliary tract infections: a guide to drug treatment.胆道感染:药物治疗指南
Drugs. 1999 Jan;57(1):81-91. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199957010-00007.

本文引用的文献

1
AMPICILLIN LEVELS IN HUMAN BILE.人体胆汁中的氨苄青霉素水平。
Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1965 Feb;24(1):189-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1965.tb02094.x.
2
Acute septic complications in gastrointestinal emergencies.胃肠道急症中的急性感染性并发症
Clin Gastroenterol. 1981 Jan;10(1):93-106.
3
Factors in management of acute cholangitis.急性胆管炎的管理因素
Ann Surg. 1982 Feb;195(2):137-45. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198202000-00003.
4
Acute suppurative cholangitis.急性化脓性胆管炎
Surg Clin North Am. 1981 Aug;61(4):885-92. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)42486-2.
5
Double-blind comparison of the nephrotoxicity and auditory toxicity of gentamicin and tobramycin.庆大霉素和妥布霉素肾毒性及耳毒性的双盲比较
N Engl J Med. 1980 May 15;302(20):1106-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198005153022002.
6
Hypoprothrombinemia and platelet dysfunction caused by cephalosporin and oxalactam antibiotics.头孢菌素和氧杂氮杂环类抗生素引起的低凝血酶原血症和血小板功能障碍。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1983 Jun;11(6):496-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/11.6.496.
7
Antimicrobial prophylaxis: a critique of recent trials.抗菌预防:对近期试验的评论
Rev Infect Dis. 1980 Jan-Feb;2(1):1-23. doi: 10.1093/clinids/2.1.1.
8
Biliary excretion and pharmacokinetics of cefoperazone in humans.头孢哌酮在人体中的胆汁排泄及药代动力学
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1983 Jul;12(1):27-37. doi: 10.1093/jac/12.1.27.
9
Clinical experience with cefoperazone in biliary tract infections.头孢哌酮治疗胆道感染的临床经验。
Drugs. 1981;22 Suppl 1:100-7. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198100221-00021.
10
Cefoperazone concentrations in bile and gall bladder wall after intravenous administration.静脉给药后胆汁和胆囊壁中的头孢哌酮浓度。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Dec;18(6):980-2. doi: 10.1128/AAC.18.6.980.

头孢哌酮与氨苄西林加妥布霉素治疗严重胆道感染的比较。

Cefoperazone compared with ampicillin plus tobramycin for severe biliary tract infections.

作者信息

Bergeron M G, Mendelson J, Harding G K, Mandell L, Fong I W, Rachlis A, Chan R, Biron S, Feld R, Segal N B

机构信息

Le Centre Hospitalier de l'Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Aug;32(8):1231-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.32.8.1231.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.32.8.1231
PMID:3056255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC172383/
Abstract

In a prospective, randomized, multicenter study, the efficacy and safety of cefoperazone and the combination ampicillin-tobramycin as initial therapy for patients with severe acute biliary tract infections were compared. Of 77 patients initially entered in the study, definite severe biliary tract infection was confirmed in 67. Sixty-four patients completed treatment. At the end of treatment, 35 of 36 (97%) patients given cefoperazone and 23 of 28 (82%) given ampicillin-tobramycin were cured of their infection (P = 0.07). Pathogens were recovered from the bile in 32 patients; microbiological cures were observed in 18 of 19 (94%) patients receiving cefoperazone and 8 of 13 (62%) receiving ampicillin-tobramycin (P = 0.03). Thirteen patients had septicemia. None (0%) of the eight septicemic patients from the cefoperazone group, but two of five (40%) from the ampicillin-tobramycin group, were clinical failures. Of the isolated pathogens, 51% were resistant to ampicillin, while the resistance rate was 4% for tobramycin and 1% for cefoperazone (P less than 0.001). Biliary concentrations of cefoperazone were maintained at high levels--236 +/- 87 micrograms/ml up to 12 h after administration. Even in the presence of severe obstruction, cefoperazone levels in the bile and gallbladder wall were above MICs for most pathogens. Cefoperazone may be considered as an excellent alternative in the therapy of severe biliary tract infections.

摘要

在一项前瞻性、随机、多中心研究中,比较了头孢哌酮以及氨苄西林-妥布霉素联合用药作为重症急性胆道感染患者初始治疗的疗效和安全性。最初纳入该研究的77例患者中,67例确诊为重症胆道感染。64例患者完成了治疗。治疗结束时,接受头孢哌酮治疗的36例患者中有35例(97%)感染治愈,接受氨苄西林-妥布霉素治疗的28例患者中有23例(82%)感染治愈(P = 0.07)。32例患者胆汁中分离出病原体;接受头孢哌酮治疗的19例患者中有18例(94%)微生物学治愈,接受氨苄西林-妥布霉素治疗的13例患者中有8例(62%)微生物学治愈(P = 0.03)。13例患者发生败血症。头孢哌酮组的8例败血症患者无一例(0%)治疗失败,但氨苄西林-妥布霉素组的5例中有2例(40%)治疗失败。在分离出的病原体中,51%对氨苄西林耐药,而对妥布霉素的耐药率为4%,对头孢哌酮的耐药率为1%(P<0.001)。头孢哌酮的胆汁浓度维持在较高水平——给药后12小时内为236±87微克/毫升。即使存在严重梗阻,胆汁和胆囊壁中的头孢哌酮水平对于大多数病原体仍高于最低抑菌浓度。头孢哌酮可被视为重症胆道感染治疗中的一种极佳替代药物。