• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢哌酮与氨苄西林+妥布霉素治疗重症支气管肺和胸膜感染性病变的比较临床试验

[Comparative clinical trial of cefoperazone versus ampicillin + tobramycin in severe bronchopulmonary and pleural infectious pathology].

作者信息

Vergnon J M, Vincent M, Ros A, Brun Y, Brune J

出版信息

Rev Pneumol Clin. 1985;41(3):205-11.

PMID:4048752
Abstract

This study involved an open trial with parallel randomised series receiving either cefoperazone (2 g/d) or a combination of ampicillin (6 g/d) and tobramycin (3 to 4 mg/kg/d). The 30 patients included were of both sexes (male predominance), hospitalised, aged 62 +/- 11,5 years and suffering from a severe bronchopulmonary or pleural infection. Underlying pathology was serious (neoplasm, C.O.D.L., bronchiectasis, cardiac pathology). No significant difference was seen in the sampling of the two populations. Cefoperazone was prescribed in 2 infusions per 24 hours. Ampicillin was given as 3 infusions, followed by tobramycin administered by a similar number of injections. The duration of treatment was 16.8 +/- 9 days (cefoperazone) and 11,8 +/- 6,5 days (ampicillin + tobramycin). Overall evaluation (clinical, radiological and laboratory criteria) showed 88% (cefoperazone group) and 71% (ampicillin + tobramycin group) recovery and improvement rates. There were two failures in the cefoperazone group and 6 failures in the other group. These results were not statistically different. Three of the 6 failures could be attributed to resistance of the initial bacteria or selected by one or other type of treatment. None of the antibiotics prescribed raised any acceptability problems.

摘要

本研究为一项开放试验,采用平行随机分组,一组接受头孢哌酮(2克/天),另一组接受氨苄西林(6克/天)与妥布霉素(3至4毫克/千克/天)的联合用药。纳入的30例患者男女皆有(男性居多),均为住院患者,年龄62±11.5岁,患有严重支气管肺部或胸膜感染。基础病理情况严重(肿瘤、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、支气管扩张、心脏疾病)。两组患者的样本情况无显著差异。头孢哌酮每24小时分2次输注给药。氨苄西林分3次输注给药,随后妥布霉素以相似次数注射给药。治疗时长为头孢哌酮组16.8±9天,氨苄西林+妥布霉素组11.8±6.5天。综合评估(临床、影像学和实验室标准)显示,头孢哌酮组的康复和改善率为88%,氨苄西林+妥布霉素组为71%。头孢哌酮组有2例治疗失败,另一组有6例治疗失败。这些结果无统计学差异。6例治疗失败中有3例可归因于初始细菌耐药或因一种或另一种治疗方式导致。所使用的任何一种抗生素均未出现可接受性问题。

相似文献

1
[Comparative clinical trial of cefoperazone versus ampicillin + tobramycin in severe bronchopulmonary and pleural infectious pathology].头孢哌酮与氨苄西林+妥布霉素治疗重症支气管肺和胸膜感染性病变的比较临床试验
Rev Pneumol Clin. 1985;41(3):205-11.
2
Antibiotics in infections of the biliary tract.抗生素在胆道感染中的应用
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1987 Oct;165(4):285-92.
3
Cefoperazone compared with ampicillin plus tobramycin for severe biliary tract infections.头孢哌酮与氨苄西林加妥布霉素治疗严重胆道感染的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Aug;32(8):1231-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.32.8.1231.
4
Experience with the third generation cephalosporins, cefoperazone and cefotaxime: report.第三代头孢菌素头孢哌酮和头孢噻肟的使用经验:报告
N Z Med J. 1984 May 9;97(755):293-6.
5
Broad spectrum penicillin as an adequate therapy for acute cholangitis.广谱青霉素作为急性胆管炎的充分治疗方法。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990 Oct;171(4):275-82.
6
Metronidazole and tobramycin in intra-abdominal sepsis.甲硝唑与妥布霉素治疗腹腔内脓毒症
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 Aug;155(2):235-7.
7
Evaluation of three antibiotic programs in newborn infants.新生儿三种抗生素治疗方案的评估。
Can Med Assoc J. 1978 Mar 18;118(6):659-62.
8
Antibiotic use in neonatal sepsis.新生儿败血症中的抗生素使用。
Turk J Pediatr. 1998 Jan-Mar;40(1):17-33.
9
Tobramycin once-a-day vs cefoperazone twice-a-day in the therapy of urinary tract infections.妥布霉素一日一次与头孢哌酮一日两次治疗尿路感染的对比研究
J Chemother. 1989 Jul;1(4 Suppl):860-1.
10
[Sulbactam/ampicillin in comparison with cefuroxime for infections of the lower respiratory tract. Results of a prospective, randomized comparative study].
Med Klin (Munich). 1993 Jan 15;88(1):16-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Dual antibiotics for bronchiectasis.用于支气管扩张症的双重抗生素疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 11;6(6):CD012514. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012514.pub2.
2
Prolonged antibiotics for non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in children and adults.儿童和成人非囊性纤维化支气管扩张症的长期抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 13;2015(8):CD001392. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001392.pub3.
3
Beta lactam antibiotic monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside antibiotic combination therapy for sepsis.β-内酰胺类抗生素单药治疗与β-内酰胺类-氨基糖苷类抗生素联合治疗败血症的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 7;2014(1):CD003344. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003344.pub3.
4
Beta lactam monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy for sepsis in immunocompetent patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.β-内酰胺类单药治疗与β-内酰胺类-氨基糖苷类联合治疗对免疫功能正常患者败血症的疗效:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ. 2004 Mar 20;328(7441):668. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38028.520995.63. Epub 2004 Mar 2.