Suppr超能文献

用于提高STEAM脉冲序列所提供频谱信噪比的快速帕德变换。

Fast Padé transform for increasing the signal to noise ratio of spectra provided by STEAM pulse sequence.

作者信息

Saeedi-Moghadam Mahdi, Pouladian Majid, Faghihi Reza, Lotfi Mehrzad

机构信息

Department of Medical Radiation Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Technol Health Care. 2019;27(2):167-172. doi: 10.3233/THC-181535.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: There are two routine pulse-sequences for single voxel spectroscopy (SVS), point resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) and stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM). Although STEAM has several advantages in comparison to PRESS, signal/noise ratio (SNR) superiority of PRESS makes it the first choice for SVS. Application of fast Padé transform (FPT) instead of Fast Furrier transform (FFT) might increase the SNR of the signal produced by STEAM pulse-sequence and therefore allows the benefits of its advantages. We aimed to evaluate and compare the noise root mean square (RMS) and SNR provided by STEAM pulse-sequence using both FPT and FFT.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

A gelatin-based phantom was constructed in a 19-cm acrylic cylinder. The phantom had two normal/tumoral parts. The SVS was performed using a 3T MRI scanner. STEAM pulse-sequence were used with the following parameters: TR = 2000 ms, TM = 10 ms, and three TEs of 20, 135 and 270 ms with two data-points of 1024 and 512 and voxel-size of 1 cm3. The raw data were extracted and processed using both FFT and FPT estimators to produce the spectrum. The noise RMS and SNR of Cho and Cr metabolites were assessed.

RESULTS

According to the results, noise RMS of spectra provided by FPT were decreased between 3619.01-14252.94% in comparison to FFT (p< 0.00001). The SNR of Cr1 and Cho peaks of the spectra provided by FPT were increased more than 96.80 and 97.18, respectively (0.00006 <p< 0.02).

DISCUSSION

The difference of noise RMS's provided by FPT are thousands percent less than FFT. This enormous decrease in noise provides a good increase of SNR. While the range of Cr1 and Cho SNR by FFT are between 41.55-120.32 the range of SNRs of these peaks provided by FPT are between 1719.99-9744.79, which implies a significant difference between the efficiency of FPT and FFT.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that application of FPT in comparison to FFT can increase the spectra SNR and so that its usage can be helpful during the application of STEAM pulse-sequence which results in lower SNR in comparison to PRESS pulse-sequence. Thus, we should make use of the advantages of STEAM pulse-sequence.

摘要

背景/目的:单体素磁共振波谱成像(SVS)有两种常规脉冲序列,即点分辨波谱序列(PRESS)和激励回波采集模式(STEAM)。尽管与PRESS相比,STEAM有诸多优势,但PRESS的信噪比(SNR)优势使其成为SVS的首选。应用快速帕德变换(FPT)而非快速傅里叶变换(FFT)可能会提高STEAM脉冲序列产生信号的SNR,从而发挥其优势。我们旨在评估和比较使用FPT和FFT时STEAM脉冲序列的噪声均方根(RMS)和SNR。

材料与方法

在一个19厘米的丙烯酸圆柱体内构建了一个基于明胶的模型。该模型有两个正常/肿瘤部分。使用3T磁共振成像扫描仪进行SVS。STEAM脉冲序列的参数如下:重复时间(TR)=2000毫秒,混合时间(TM)=10毫秒,三个回波时间(TE)分别为20、135和270毫秒,有两个数据点分别为1024和512,体素大小为1立方厘米。提取原始数据并使用FFT和FPT估计器进行处理以生成波谱。评估了胆碱(Cho)和肌酸(Cr)代谢物的噪声RMS和SNR。

结果

结果显示,与FFT相比,FPT提供的波谱噪声RMS降低了3619.01 - 14252.94%(p < 0.00001)。FPT提供的波谱中Cr1和Cho峰的SNR分别增加了96.80以上和97.18以上(0.00006 < p < 0.02)。

讨论

FPT提供的噪声RMS差异比FFT小数千个百分点。噪声的大幅降低使SNR有了显著提高。FFT得到的Cr1和Cho的SNR范围在41.55 - 120.32之间,而FPT得到的这些峰的SNR范围在1719.99 - 9744.79之间,这意味着FPT和FFT的效率存在显著差异。

结论

本研究表明,与FFT相比,应用FPT可提高波谱SNR,因此在应用STEAM脉冲序列时(与PRESS脉冲序列相比,其SNR较低)使用FPT会有帮助。因此,我们应利用STEAM脉冲序列的优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验