Qiu Lu, Wang Meng, Hu Shaofan, Ru Xufang, Ren Yonggang, Zhang Zhengwen, Yu Siwang, Zhang Yiguo
The Laboratory of Cell Biochemistry and Topogenetic Regulation, College of Bioengineering and Faculty of Sciences, Chongqing University, No. 174 Shazheng Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing 400044, China.
Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, School of Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, 42 Western Common Road, Glasgow G22 5PQ, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Cancers (Basel). 2018 Dec 17;10(12):520. doi: 10.3390/cancers10120520.
Liver-specific knockout of Nrf1 in the mouse leads to spontaneous development of non- alcoholic steatohepatitis with dyslipidemia, and then its deterioration results in hepatoma, but the underlying mechanism remains elusive to date. A similar pathological model is reconstructed here by using human Nrf1α-specific knockout cell lines. Our evidence has demonstrated that a marked increase of the inflammation marker COX2 definitely occurs in cells. Loss of Nrf1α leads to hyperactivation of Nrf2, which results from substantial decreases in Keap1, PTEN and most of 26S proteasomal subunits in cells. Further investigation of xenograft model mice showed that malignant growth of -derived tumors is almost abolished by silencing of Nrf2, while -tumor is markedly repressed by an inactive mutant (i.e., ), but largely unaffected by constitutive activator (i.e., ). Mechanistic studies, combined with transcriptomic sequencing, unraveled a panoramic view of opposing and unifying inter-regulatory cross-talks between Nrf1α and Nrf2 at different layers of the endogenous regulatory networks from multiple signaling towards differential expression profiling of target genes. Collectively, Nrf1α manifests a dominant tumor-suppressive effect by confining Nrf2 oncogenicity. Though as a tumor promoter, Nrf2 can also, in turn, directly activate the transcriptional expression of to form a negative feedback loop. In view of such mutual inter-regulation by between Nrf1α and Nrf2, it should thus be taken severe cautions to interpret the experimental results from loss of Nrf1α, Nrf2 or both.
小鼠肝脏特异性敲除Nrf1会导致非酒精性脂肪性肝炎伴血脂异常的自发发展,进而病情恶化导致肝癌,但迄今为止其潜在机制仍不清楚。在此,我们利用人Nrf1α特异性敲除细胞系重建了一个类似的病理模型。我们的证据表明,炎症标志物COX2在细胞中确实显著增加。Nrf1α的缺失导致Nrf2的过度激活,这是由于细胞中Keap1、PTEN和大多数26S蛋白酶体亚基的大量减少所致。对异种移植模型小鼠的进一步研究表明,沉默Nrf2几乎消除了源自肿瘤的恶性生长,而失活突变体(即)显著抑制了肿瘤,而组成型激活剂(即)对其影响不大。机制研究结合转录组测序,揭示了从多个信号到靶基因差异表达谱的内源性调控网络不同层面上Nrf1α和Nrf2之间对立与统一的相互调控串扰全景。总的来说,Nrf1α通过限制Nrf2的致癌性表现出主要的肿瘤抑制作用。虽然作为肿瘤促进剂,Nrf2反过来也可以直接激活的转录表达,形成一个负反馈环。鉴于Nrf1α和Nrf2之间的这种相互调控,因此在解释Nrf1α、Nrf2或两者缺失的实验结果时应格外谨慎。