• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交媒体到底值多少钱?通过付费让用户停止使用 Facebook 来估算其价值。

How much is social media worth? Estimating the value of Facebook by paying users to stop using it.

机构信息

Department of Economics, Kenyon College, Gambier, OH, United States of America.

Department of Advertising + Public Relations, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Dec 19;13(12):e0207101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207101. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0207101
PMID:30566473
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6300191/
Abstract

Facebook, the online social network, has more than 2 billion global users. Because those users do not pay for the service, its benefits are hard to measure. We report the results of a series of three non-hypothetical auction experiments where winners are paid to deactivate their Facebook accounts for up to one year. Though the populations sampled and the auction design differ across the experiments, we consistently find the average Facebook user would require more than $1000 to deactivate their account for one year. While the measurable impact Facebook and other free online services have on the economy may be small, our results show that the benefits these services provide for their users are large.

摘要

脸书(Facebook)是一家全球拥有超过 20 亿用户的在线社交网络平台。由于这些用户无需为该服务付费,因此很难衡量其收益。我们报告了一系列三项非假设性拍卖实验的结果,在这些实验中,获胜者可获得报酬,让他们在未来一年时间内停用其脸书账户。虽然抽样人群和拍卖设计在三个实验中有所不同,但我们始终发现,普通脸书用户需要超过 1000 美元才能停用其账户一年。虽然脸书和其他免费在线服务对经济的可衡量影响可能很小,但我们的结果表明,这些服务为用户带来的收益是巨大的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46fe/6300191/060dfc8335e5/pone.0207101.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46fe/6300191/f0b89241857b/pone.0207101.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46fe/6300191/060dfc8335e5/pone.0207101.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46fe/6300191/f0b89241857b/pone.0207101.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46fe/6300191/060dfc8335e5/pone.0207101.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
How much is social media worth? Estimating the value of Facebook by paying users to stop using it.社交媒体到底值多少钱?通过付费让用户停止使用 Facebook 来估算其价值。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 19;13(12):e0207101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207101. eCollection 2018.
2
Who commits virtual identity suicide? Differences in privacy concerns, Internet addiction, and personality between Facebook users and quitters.谁会进行虚拟身份自杀?Facebook 用户和退出者在隐私关注、网络成瘾和个性方面的差异。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 Sep;16(9):629-34. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0323. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
3
The effects of Facebook and Instagram on the 2020 election: A deactivation experiment.脸书和照片墙对 2020 年选举的影响:一次停用实验。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 May 21;121(21):e2321584121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2321584121. Epub 2024 May 13.
4
The burden of online friends: the effects of giving up Facebook on stress and well-being.线上社交好友的负担:停用脸书对压力和幸福感的影响。
J Soc Psychol. 2018;158(4):496-507. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1453467. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
5
A Web-Based, Social Networking Beginners' Running Intervention for Adults Aged 18 to 50 Years Delivered via a Facebook Group: Randomized Controlled Trial.通过Facebook群组为18至50岁成年人开展的基于网络的社交网络新手跑步干预:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 26;20(2):e67. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7862.
6
Self-affirmation underlies Facebook use.自我肯定是使用 Facebook 的基础。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Mar;39(3):321-31. doi: 10.1177/0146167212474694. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
7
Facebook and its effects on users' empathic social skills and life satisfaction: a double-edged sword effect.脸书及其对用户共情社交技能和生活满意度的影响:双刃剑效应。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 May;17(5):276-80. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2013.0466. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
8
Outcomes in Child Health: Exploring the Use of Social Media to Engage Parents in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.儿童健康成果:探索利用社交媒体让家长参与以患者为中心的成果研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 16;19(3):e78. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6655.
9
Variations in Facebook Posting Patterns Across Validated Patient Health Conditions: A Prospective Cohort Study.不同经证实的患者健康状况下Facebook发帖模式的差异:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 6;19(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6486.
10
How Affiliation Disclosure and Control Over User-Generated Comments Affects Consumer Health Knowledge and Behavior: A Randomized Controlled Experiment of Pharmaceutical Direct-to-Consumer Advertising on Social Media.隶属关系披露和对用户生成评论的控制如何影响消费者的健康知识和行为:社交媒体上药品直接面向消费者广告的随机对照实验。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jul 19;18(7):e189. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5972.

引用本文的文献

1
Does putting down your smartphone make you happier? the effects of restricting digital media on well-being.放下智能手机会让你更快乐吗?限制数字媒体对幸福感的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 14;19(10):e0306910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306910. eCollection 2024.
2
A Nudge-Based Intervention to Reduce Problematic Smartphone Use: Randomised Controlled Trial.一种基于助推的减少问题性智能手机使用的干预措施:随机对照试验。
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022 May 17:1-23. doi: 10.1007/s11469-022-00826-w.
3
Private costs of carbon emissions abatement by limiting beef consumption and vehicle use in the United States.

本文引用的文献

1
Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?亚马逊土耳其机器人:一种新的廉价、高质量数据来源?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):3-5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
2
Exploring the motivations of Facebook use in Taiwan.探究台湾地区使用 Facebook 的动机。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012 Jun;15(6):304-11. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0611.
通过限制美国的牛肉消费和汽车使用来减少碳排放的私人成本。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 19;17(1):e0261372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261372. eCollection 2022.
4
Herd immunity at what price? Using auctions to estimate what university students must be paid to get the flu vaccine.群体免疫的代价是什么?利用拍卖来估计必须支付给大学生多少钱才能让他们接种流感疫苗。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Jun 23;23:101466. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101466. eCollection 2021 Sep.