• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谎报创伤性虚拟现实体验对记忆的影响。

The impact of lying about a traumatic virtual reality experience on memory.

作者信息

Romeo Tameka, Otgaar Henry, Smeets Tom, Landstrom Sara, Boerboom Didi

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Forensic Psychology Section, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Department of Psychology, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2019 Apr;47(3):485-495. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0885-6.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-018-0885-6
PMID:30569397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6450849/
Abstract

The goal of the present experiment was to examine the effect of certain (deceptive) strategies (e.g., false denial) on memory. Specifically, participants were shown a traumatic virtual reality (VR) video of an airplane crash. Following this, participants (N= 94) received questions concerning details from the VR scene in a baseline memory task. Then, participants could choose from 3 options how to cope in response to having experienced the VR scene: tell the truth, falsely deny, or fabricate. The majority opted to tell the truth (n = 81). A subsample of truth tellers were instructed to falsely deny having seen certain details. One week later, all participants received a source monitoring task in which they were asked (1) whether they remembered talking about these details during an interview, and (2) whether they remembered seeing certain details during the VR experience the week before. Participants had to tell the truth during this task. Participants who were instructed to falsely deny showed impaired memory for presented details that had previously been discussed (i.e., denial-induced forgetting) and seen in the VR scene. Also, the presentation of certain details in the baseline memory task seemed to inoculate participants who were instructed to falsely deny from experiencing memory impairment. The current experiment suggests that false denials can have adverse ramifications for memory for what is discussed and seen.

摘要

本实验的目的是研究某些(欺骗性)策略(如虚假否认)对记忆的影响。具体而言,研究人员向参与者展示了一段飞机坠毁的创伤性虚拟现实(VR)视频。在此之后,参与者(N = 94)在一项基线记忆任务中被问及有关VR场景细节的问题。然后,参与者可以从三种选择中选择如何应对所经历的VR场景:说实话、虚假否认或编造。大多数人选择说实话(n = 81)。一部分说实话的参与者被指示虚假否认看到过某些细节。一周后,所有参与者都接受了一项源监测任务,在该任务中,他们被问及:(1)是否记得在访谈中谈论过这些细节,以及(2)是否记得在前一周的VR体验中看到过某些细节。参与者在这项任务中必须说实话。被指示虚假否认的参与者对之前讨论过(即否认导致的遗忘)并在VR场景中看到的呈现细节的记忆受损。此外,基线记忆任务中某些细节的呈现似乎使被指示虚假否认的参与者免受记忆损害。当前的实验表明,虚假否认可能会对所讨论和看到内容的记忆产生不利影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0c/6450849/b2d33a2f9388/13421_2018_885_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0c/6450849/6b6752366033/13421_2018_885_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0c/6450849/b2d33a2f9388/13421_2018_885_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0c/6450849/6b6752366033/13421_2018_885_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0c/6450849/b2d33a2f9388/13421_2018_885_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of lying about a traumatic virtual reality experience on memory.谎报创伤性虚拟现实体验对记忆的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Apr;47(3):485-495. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0885-6.
2
Forgetting having denied: The "amnesic" consequences of denial.忘记曾予以否认:否认的“遗忘性”后果。
Mem Cognit. 2018 May;46(4):520-529. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0781-5.
3
False denials increase false memories for trauma-related discussions.虚假否认会增加与创伤相关讨论的虚假记忆。
Memory. 2022 Oct;30(9):1158-1171. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2022.2094964. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
4
The development of differential mnemonic effects of false denials and forced confabulations.错误否认和强迫性虚构的差异性记忆效应的发展。
Behav Sci Law. 2014 Nov-Dec;32(6):718-31. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2148. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
5
The impact of false denials on forgetting and false memory.虚假否认对遗忘和错误记忆的影响。
Cognition. 2020 Sep;202:104322. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104322. Epub 2020 May 26.
6
The role of executive functions in the effects of lying on memory.执行功能在说谎对记忆影响中的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Apr;215:103295. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103295. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
7
When lying changes memory for the truth.当说谎改变了对真相的记忆。
Memory. 2018 Jan;26(1):2-14. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1340286. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
8
Do liars really remember what they lied upon? The impact of fabrication on memory.说谎者真的记得他们说谎的内容吗?捏造事实对记忆的影响。
Memory. 2021 Sep;29(8):1076-1090. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1960380. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
9
Psychophysiological reactivity, coping behaviour and intrusive memories upon multisensory Virtual Reality and Script-Driven Imagery analogue trauma: A randomised controlled crossover study.多感官虚拟现实和脚本驱动意象模拟创伤后的心理生理反应、应对行为和侵入性记忆:一项随机对照交叉研究。
J Anxiety Disord. 2018 Oct;59:42-52. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
10
Use of immersive virtual reality to assess episodic memory: A validation study in older adults.使用沉浸式虚拟现实技术评估情景记忆:老年人的验证研究。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020 Apr;30(3):462-480. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2018.1477684. Epub 2018 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of deception on memory: a comparative study of actors and eyewitnesses accounts.欺骗对记忆的影响:演员和目击者证言的比较研究。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Nov 7;12(1):638. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02152-3.
2
Proposing immersive virtual reality scenarios for validating verbal content analysis methods in adult samples.提出沉浸式虚拟现实场景以验证针对成人样本的言语内容分析方法。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 19;15:1352091. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1352091. eCollection 2024.
3
The effect of lying on memory in daily life: Does motivation matter?

本文引用的文献

1
A process-oriented perspective examining the relationships among daily coping, stress, and affect.一种以过程为导向的视角,审视日常应对、压力和情感之间的关系。
Pers Individ Dif. 2017 Jan;104:357-361. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.041. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
2
Forgetting having denied: The "amnesic" consequences of denial.忘记曾予以否认:否认的“遗忘性”后果。
Mem Cognit. 2018 May;46(4):520-529. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0781-5.
3
News Feature: Virtual reality therapy set for a real renaissance.新闻特写:虚拟现实疗法即将迎来真正的复兴。
日常生活中说谎对记忆的影响:动机重要吗?
Psych J. 2024 Apr;13(2):216-226. doi: 10.1002/pchj.709. Epub 2023 Dec 17.
4
External and internal influences yield similar memory effects: the role of deception and suggestion.外部和内部影响产生相似的记忆效应:欺骗与暗示的作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 28;14:1081528. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1081528. eCollection 2023.
5
The effect of credibility assessment techniques on consistency and subsequent memory for the truth.可信度评估技术对一致性及后续事实记忆的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 26;14:1184055. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1184055. eCollection 2023.
6
Can false denials turn fact into fiction? The effect of false denials on memory for self-performed actions.虚假否认能否将事实变为虚构?虚假否认对自我行为记忆的影响。
Psychol Res. 2023 Apr;87(3):816-825. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01695-7. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
7
Research on the Effects of Lying on Memory: A Scientometric Analysis and a Call for New Studies.躺着对记忆影响的研究:科学计量分析及新研究呼吁
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 24;13:837265. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.837265. eCollection 2022.
8
More Lies Lead to More Memory Impairments in Daily Life.在日常生活中,更多的谎言会导致更多的记忆损伤。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 22;13:822788. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.822788. eCollection 2022.
9
Simulating denial increases false memory rates for abuse unrelated information.模拟否认会增加与虐待无关信息的虚假记忆率。
Behav Sci Law. 2022 May;40(3):433-451. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2566. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
10
Who did I lie to that day? Deception impairs memory in daily life.那天我对谁说谎了?欺骗会损害日常生活中的记忆。
Psychol Res. 2022 Sep;86(6):1763-1773. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01619-x. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Sep 26;114(39):10295-10299. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715133114.
4
When lying changes memory for the truth.当说谎改变了对真相的记忆。
Memory. 2018 Jan;26(1):2-14. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1340286. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
5
Preschoolers' disclosures of child sexual abuse: Examining corroborated cases from Swedish courts.学龄前儿童披露的儿童性虐待:从瑞典法庭的佐证案例来看。
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Aug;70:199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
6
Internalizing symptoms and polyvictimization in a clinical sample of adolescents: The roles of social support and non-productive coping strategies.青少年临床样本中的内化症状与多重受害经历:社会支持与非适应性应对策略的作用
Child Abuse Negl. 2016 Apr;54:57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
7
The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5):编制与初步心理测量评估
J Trauma Stress. 2015 Dec;28(6):489-98. doi: 10.1002/jts.22059. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
8
Virtual reality, real emotions: a novel analogue for the assessment of risk factors of post-traumatic stress disorder.虚拟现实,真实情感:一种用于评估创伤后应激障碍风险因素的新型模拟方法。
Front Psychol. 2015 May 22;6:681. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00681. eCollection 2015.
9
The cognitive mechanisms underlying deception: an event-related potential study.欺骗背后的认知机制:一项事件相关电位研究。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Mar;95(3):395-405. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.01.010. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
10
The development of differential mnemonic effects of false denials and forced confabulations.错误否认和强迫性虚构的差异性记忆效应的发展。
Behav Sci Law. 2014 Nov-Dec;32(6):718-31. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2148. Epub 2014 Nov 24.