Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, No. 300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu Province, China.
Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, No. 300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu Province, China.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Dec;45(12):4223-4234. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02678-1. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
PI-RADS score 3 is recognized as equivocal likelihood of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) occurrence. We aimed to develop a Radiomics machine learning (RML)-based redefining score to screen out csPCa in equivocal PI-RADS score 3 category.
Total of 263 patients with the dominant index lesion scored PI-RADS 3 who underwent biopsy and/or follow-up formed the primary cohort. One-step RML (RML-i) model integrated radiomic features of T2WI, DWI, and ADC images all together, and two-step RML (RML-ii) model integrated the three independent radiomic signatures from T2WI (T2WI), DWI (DWI), and ADC (ADC) separately into a regression model. The two RML models, as well as T2WI, DWI, and ADC, were compared using the receiver operating characteristic-derived area under the curve (AUC), calibration plot, and decision-curve analysis (DCA). Two radiologists were asked to give a subjective binary assessment, and Cohen's kappa statistics were calculated.
A total of 59/263 (22.4%) csPCa were identified. Inter-reader agreement was moderate (Kappa = 0.435). The AUC of RML-i (0.89; 95% CI 0.88-0.90) is higher (p = 0.003) than that of RML-ii (0.87; 95% CI 0.86-0.88). The DCA demonstrated that the RML-i and RML-ii significantly improved risk prediction at threshold probabilities of csPCa at 20% to 80% compared with doing-none or doing-all by PI-RADS score 3 or stratifying by separated DWI, ADC, or T2WI.
Our RML models have the potential to predict csPCa in PI-RADS score 3 lesions, thus can inform the decision making process of biopsy.
PI-RADS 评分 3 被认为是前列腺癌(PCa)发生的临床显著概率(csPCa)的不确定程度。本研究旨在开发一种基于放射组学机器学习(RML)的重新定义评分,以筛选出 PI-RADS 评分 3 不确定程度的 csPCa。
共纳入 263 例经主导病灶活检和/或随访的 PI-RADS 评分 3 患者作为主要队列。一步式 RML(RML-i)模型整合了 T2WI、DWI 和 ADC 图像的放射组学特征,而两步式 RML(RML-ii)模型则分别将 T2WI(T2WI)、DWI(DWI)和 ADC(ADC)三个独立的放射组学特征整合到回归模型中。比较两种 RML 模型、T2WI、DWI 和 ADC 的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)、校准图和决策曲线分析(DCA)。两名放射科医生进行主观的二分类评估,并计算 Cohen's kappa 统计量。
共发现 59/263(22.4%)例 csPCa。两位放射科医生的判读具有中度一致性(Kappa=0.435)。RML-i 的 AUC 为 0.89(95% CI 0.88-0.90),高于 RML-ii(0.87;95% CI 0.86-0.88)(p=0.003)。DCA 显示,与 PI-RADS 评分 3 或单独 DWI、ADC 或 T2WI 分层相比,RML-i 和 RML-ii 显著提高了在 20%至 80%的 csPCa 阈值概率下的风险预测能力。
本研究的 RML 模型具有预测 PI-RADS 评分 3 病变中 csPCa 的潜力,从而可以为活检决策提供依据。