• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强化降压治疗难治性高血压。

Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment for Resistant Hypertension.

机构信息

From the Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism, Center Hospital, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Hypertension. 2019 Feb;73(2):415-423. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12156.

DOI:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12156
PMID:30580680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6343947/
Abstract

Evidence about the target blood pressure (BP) in patients with resistant hypertension is limited. The present study aimed to assess the efficacy of intensive BP treatment (systolic BP target, <120 mm Hg) versus standard BP treatment (systolic BP target, <140 mm Hg) in patients with resistant hypertension. This is a secondary analysis using data from SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial). This study included 1397 patients with resistant hypertension and 7698 without resistant hypertension. Using the Cox proportional hazards model, we compared time to first occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) between the intensive and standard BP treatment groups. Mean follow-up was 3.1 years; major adverse cardiovascular events was confirmed in 381 patients. Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events was significantly lower in the intensive treatment group than in the standard treatment group (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40-0.96; P=0.03). Risks of all-cause and cardiovascular death in patients with resistant hypertension were also significantly lower in the intensive treatment group than in the standard treatment group (hazard ratio for all-cause death: 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.97; P=0.03; hazard ratio for cardiovascular death: 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15-0.81; P=0.01). Similar associations were observed in various subgroups. Intensive BP treatment was significantly associated with a decreased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with resistant hypertension.

摘要

有关难治性高血压患者的目标血压(BP)的证据有限。本研究旨在评估强化 BP 治疗(收缩压目标,<120mmHg)与标准 BP 治疗(收缩压目标,<140mmHg)对难治性高血压患者的疗效。这是对 SPRINT(收缩压干预试验)数据的二次分析。本研究纳入了 1397 例难治性高血压患者和 7698 例无难治性高血压患者。采用 Cox 比例风险模型,我们比较了强化治疗组和标准治疗组之间首次发生主要不良心血管事件(心血管死亡、心肌梗死和卒中)的时间。平均随访 3.1 年;381 例患者确诊主要不良心血管事件。强化治疗组的主要不良心血管事件风险显著低于标准治疗组(风险比,0.62;95%CI,0.40-0.96;P=0.03)。强化治疗组的全因死亡和心血管死亡风险也显著低于标准治疗组(全因死亡风险比:0.60;95%CI,0.38-0.97;P=0.03;心血管死亡风险比:0.34;95%CI,0.15-0.81;P=0.01)。在各种亚组中也观察到了类似的关联。强化 BP 治疗与难治性高血压患者的主要不良心血管事件风险降低显著相关。

相似文献

1
Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment for Resistant Hypertension.强化降压治疗难治性高血压。
Hypertension. 2019 Feb;73(2):415-423. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12156.
2
[The SPRINT Research. A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control].[收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)研究。强化与标准血压控制的随机试验]
Vnitr Lek. 2016 Jan;62(1):44-7.
3
Benefit and harm of intensive blood pressure treatment: Derivation and validation of risk models using data from the SPRINT and ACCORD trials.强化血压治疗的益处与危害:利用收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)和控制糖尿病患者心血管风险行动(ACCORD)试验数据推导和验证风险模型
PLoS Med. 2017 Oct 17;14(10):e1002410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002410. eCollection 2017 Oct.
4
Evaluation of Optimal Diastolic Blood Pressure Range Among Adults With Treated Systolic Blood Pressure Less Than 130 mm Hg.收缩压治疗后低于130mmHg的成年人最佳舒张压范围的评估
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037554. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37554.
5
Role of Diuretics in Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial: A Post Hoc Analysis.利尿剂在收缩压干预试验中的心血管事件和死亡率中的作用:事后分析。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 May 1;19(5):620-627. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000406. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
6
Assessment of Risk of Harm Associated With Intensive Blood Pressure Management Among Patients With Hypertension Who Smoke: A Secondary Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.高血压患者强化血压管理相关伤害风险评估:收缩压干预试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190005. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0005.
7
Cardiovascular Risk in Hypertension in Relation to Achieved Blood Pressure Using Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurement.使用自动诊室血压测量评估高血压患者的心血管风险与血压控制情况的关系
Hypertension. 2016 Oct;68(4):866-72. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07721. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
8
Optimal Systolic Blood Pressure Target After SPRINT: Insights from a Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.SPRINT 试验后最佳收缩压目标:来自随机试验网络荟萃分析的见解
Am J Med. 2017 Jun;130(6):707-719.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
9
Optimal Systolic Blood Pressure Target in Resistant and Non-Resistant Hypertension: A Pooled Analysis of Patient-Level Data from SPRINT and ACCORD.在耐药性和非耐药性高血压中最佳收缩压目标:SPRINT 和 ACCORD 患者水平数据的汇总分析。
Am J Med. 2018 Dec;131(12):1463-1472.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
10
Impact of Achieved Blood Pressure on First Stroke in Uncomplicated Grade 1 Hypertension.单纯1级高血压患者血压控制情况对首次卒中的影响
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Mar 8;6(3):e005247. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005247.

引用本文的文献

1
Cerebrovascular reactivity impairment in resistant hypertension.顽固性高血压患者的脑血管反应性损害
J Hum Hypertens. 2025 Aug 2. doi: 10.1038/s41371-025-01058-w.
2
Long-Term Electrocardiographic Changes Following Renal Denervation-Left Ventricular Mass and Arrhythmia Burden.肾去神经支配后的长期心电图变化——左心室质量与心律失常负担
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2025 Aug;27(8):e70112. doi: 10.1111/jch.70112.
3
Targeted approaches to diagnose and treat resistant hypertension in Asia.亚洲地区诊断和治疗顽固性高血压的靶向方法。

本文引用的文献

1
Resistant Hypertension: Detection, Evaluation, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.耐药性高血压:检测、评估与管理:美国心脏协会科学声明。
Hypertension. 2018 Nov;72(5):e53-e90. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000084.
2
Resistant Hypertension: Insights on Evaluation and Management in the Post-SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) Era.顽固性高血压:冲刺(收缩压干预试验)时代评估与管理的见解
Hypertension. 2016 Nov;68(5):1073-1080. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07316. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
3
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.
Hypertens Res. 2024 Oct;47(10):2955-2958. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01833-1. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
4
Advances on the Experimental Research in Resistant Hypertension.抗高血压的实验研究进展。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2024 Dec;26(12):475-482. doi: 10.1007/s11906-024-01315-2. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
5
Intensive blood pressure management in patients using multiple classes of antihypertensive drugs or with resistant hypertension.使用多种抗高血压药物或患有顽固性高血压的患者的强化血压管理。
Hypertens Res. 2024 Sep;47(9):2607-2609. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01803-7. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
6
Gender Difference of Blood Pressure Control Rate and Clinical Prognosis in Patients With Resistant Hypertension: Real-World Observation Study.性别差异与高血压患者血压控制率及临床预后的关系:真实世界观察研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Apr 24;38(16):e124. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e124.
7
Impact of Diabetes Medication Therapy Adherence Clinic (DMTAC) appointment intervals on glycemic control in public health clinics across Perak, Malaysia.马来西亚霹雳州公共卫生诊所中糖尿病药物治疗依从性诊所(DMTAC)预约间隔对血糖控制的影响。
Malays Fam Physician. 2022 Nov 13;17(3):105-113. doi: 10.51866/oa134l. eCollection 2022 Nov 30.
8
Guideline-Driven Management of Hypertension: An Evidence-Based Update.指南导向的高血压管理:基于证据的更新。
Circ Res. 2021 Apr 2;128(7):827-846. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318083. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
9
Spironolactone Use and Improved Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction With Resistant Hypertension.螺内酯的应用与难治性高血压伴射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者结局的改善。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Dec;9(23):e018827. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018827. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
10
Resistant hypertension-defining the scope of the problem.耐药性高血压——定义问题的范围。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Jan-Feb;63(1):46-50. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2019.12.006. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
强化与标准血压控制的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
4
Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol, and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2): a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial.螺内酯与安慰剂、比索洛尔及多沙唑嗪对比以确定难治性高血压的最佳治疗方案(PATHWAY-2):一项随机、双盲、交叉试验
Lancet. 2015 Nov 21;386(10008):2059-2068. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00257-3. Epub 2015 Sep 20.
5
Treatment-resistant hypertension and the incidence of cardiovascular disease and end-stage renal disease: results from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).抗高血压和降脂治疗预防心脏病发作试验(ALLHAT):治疗抵抗性高血压与心血管疾病和终末期肾病的发病率。
Hypertension. 2014 Nov;64(5):1012-21. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03850. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
6
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of resistant hypertension in treated hypertensive populations.治疗的高血压人群中难治性高血压患病率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Hypertens. 2015 Mar;28(3):355-61. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpu151. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
7
Cardiovascular and mortality risk of apparent resistant hypertension in women with suspected myocardial ischemia: a report from the NHLBI-sponsored WISE Study.疑似心肌缺血女性中明显的抗高血压药物抵抗与心血管和死亡风险:来自 NHLBI 赞助的 WISE 研究的报告。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Feb 28;3(1):e000660. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000660.
8
2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8).2014 年成人高血压管理的循证指南:第八届联合国家委员会(JNC 8)任命的专家组报告。
JAMA. 2014 Feb 5;311(5):507-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.284427.
9
2013 AHA/ACC guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2013年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会降低心血管风险生活方式管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt B):2960-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
10
2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension.2013年欧洲高血压学会/欧洲心脏病学会动脉高血压管理指南
Blood Press. 2013 Aug;22(4):193-278. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2013.812549. Epub 2013 Jun 18.