• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞典一项基于人群的调查:三种假设癌症风险水平下的癌症担忧分布及接受结肠镜检查的意愿

Cancer Worry Distribution and Willingness to Undergo Colonoscopy at Three Levels of Hypothetical Cancer Risk-A Population-Based Survey in Sweden.

作者信息

Hawranek Carolina, Maxon Johan, Andersson Andreas, Van Guelpen Bethany, Hajdarevic Senada, Numan Hellquist Barbro, Rosén Anna

机构信息

Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.

Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 12;14(4):918. doi: 10.3390/cancers14040918.

DOI:10.3390/cancers14040918
PMID:35205668
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8870195/
Abstract

PURPOSE

We describe levels of cancer worry in the general population as measured with the Cancer Worry Scale (CWS) and investigate the association with colonoscopy screening intentions in three colorectal cancer risk scenarios.

METHODS

The data were sourced through a population-based survey. Respondents ( = 943) completed an eight-item CWS and questions on colonoscopy screening interest at three hypothetical risk levels.

RESULTS

Respondents without a personal cancer history ( = 853) scored 9.46 on the six-item CWS (mean, SD 2.72). Mean scores were significantly higher in women (9.91, SD 2.89) as compared to men (9.06, SD 2.49, < 0.001). Linear regression showed higher cancer worry in women and those with children when controlling for education, age group, and country of birth. High cancer worry (six-item CWS mean >12) was identified in 25% of women and in 17% of men. Among those, 71% would attend a colonoscopy screening compared to 52% of those with low cancer worry ( < 0.001, 5% CRC-risk).

CONCLUSIONS

The distribution of cancer worry in a general population sample showed higher mean scores in women, and levels overlapped with earlier findings in cancer-affected samples. Respondents with high cancer worry were more inclined to undergo a colonoscopy screening, and intention increased with higher levels of hypothetical risk.

摘要

目的

我们描述了通过癌症担忧量表(CWS)测量的普通人群中的癌症担忧水平,并研究了在三种结直肠癌风险情景下与结肠镜检查筛查意向的关联。

方法

数据来源于一项基于人群的调查。受访者(n = 943)完成了一个包含八个条目的CWS以及关于在三种假设风险水平下结肠镜检查筛查兴趣的问题。

结果

无个人癌症病史的受访者(n = 853)在六项CWS上的得分为9.46(均值,标准差2.72)。与男性(9.06,标准差2.49,P < 0.001)相比,女性的平均得分显著更高(9.91,标准差2.89)。在控制教育程度、年龄组和出生国家后,线性回归显示女性和有孩子的人癌症担忧更高。25%的女性和17%的男性被确定为高癌症担忧(六项CWS均值>12)。在这些人中,71%会参加结肠镜检查筛查,而低癌症担忧者中这一比例为52%(P < 0.001,5%结直肠癌风险)。

结论

普通人群样本中癌症担忧的分布显示女性平均得分更高,且水平与癌症患者样本中的早期发现重叠。高癌症担忧的受访者更倾向于接受结肠镜检查筛查,并且随着假设风险水平的提高,意向增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae4/8870195/a09a90366ae6/cancers-14-00918-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae4/8870195/7932a90b38d7/cancers-14-00918-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae4/8870195/44aa2b3a923e/cancers-14-00918-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae4/8870195/a09a90366ae6/cancers-14-00918-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae4/8870195/7932a90b38d7/cancers-14-00918-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae4/8870195/44aa2b3a923e/cancers-14-00918-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ae4/8870195/a09a90366ae6/cancers-14-00918-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Cancer Worry Distribution and Willingness to Undergo Colonoscopy at Three Levels of Hypothetical Cancer Risk-A Population-Based Survey in Sweden.瑞典一项基于人群的调查:三种假设癌症风险水平下的癌症担忧分布及接受结肠镜检查的意愿
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 12;14(4):918. doi: 10.3390/cancers14040918.
2
Optimism and barriers to colonoscopy in low-income Latinos at average risk for colorectal cancer.低收入、患结直肠癌平均风险的拉丁裔人群对结肠镜检查的乐观态度及障碍
Psychooncology. 2015 Sep;24(9):1138-44. doi: 10.1002/pon.3733. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
3
Psychological distress and quality of life following positive fecal occult blood testing in colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查中粪便免疫化学检测阳性后的心理困扰和生活质量。
Psychooncology. 2020 Jun;29(6):1084-1091. doi: 10.1002/pon.5381. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
4
Fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: an evidence-based analysis.用于结直肠癌筛查的粪便潜血试验:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(10):1-40. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
5
Associations of perceived risk and cancer worry for colorectal cancer with screening behaviour.对结直肠癌的感知风险和癌症担忧与筛查行为的关联。
J Health Psychol. 2018 May;23(6):840-852. doi: 10.1177/1359105316679721. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
6
The impact of personalised risk information compared to a positive/negative result on informed choice and intention to undergo colonoscopy following colorectal Cancer screening in Scotland (PERICCS) - a randomised controlled trial: study protocol.苏格兰基于结直肠癌筛查的个人化风险信息对比阳性/阴性结果对知情选择和接受结肠镜检查意向的影响(PERICCS)-一项随机对照试验:研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 16;19(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6734-0.
7
The cancer worry chart: a single-item screening measure of worry about developing breast cancer.癌症担忧量表:一种用于筛查对患乳腺癌担忧程度的单项测量工具。
Psychooncology. 2007 Jun;16(6):593-7. doi: 10.1002/pon.1128.
8
Understanding intention to undergo colonoscopy among intermediate-risk siblings of colorectal cancer patients: a test of a mediational model.了解结直肠癌患者中度风险亲属接受结肠镜检查的意愿:中介模型检验
Prev Med. 2003 Jan;36(1):71-84. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2002.1122.
9
Factors Associated With Cancer Worry Among People Aged 50 or Older, Spain, 2012-2014.2012 - 2014年西班牙50岁及以上人群中与癌症担忧相关的因素
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Dec 24;12:E226. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150398.
10
The impact of hypothetical PErsonalised Risk Information on informed choice and intention to undergo Colorectal Cancer screening colonoscopy in Scotland (PERICCS)-a randomised controlled trial.假设的个性化风险信息对苏格兰结直肠癌筛查结肠镜检查的知情选择和意向的影响(PERICCS)-一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med. 2020 Oct 20;18(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01750-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Sociocultural factors influencing women's adherence to colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screening: a systematic review.影响女性坚持进行结直肠癌、乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的社会文化因素:一项系统综述
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):2034. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23118-z.
2
Fear of cancer levels of women who applied cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study of the effects of health beliefs related to cervical cancer and Pap-Smear test.申请宫颈癌筛查的女性对癌症的恐惧程度:一项关于宫颈癌及巴氏涂片检查相关健康信念影响的横断面研究
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 May 25. doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-02008-0.
3
Exploring the psychological burden in a pancreatic cancer surveillance programme based on high-risk individuals: a Swedish cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
Acceptability, quality of life and cost overview of a remote follow-up plan for patients with colorectal cancer.结直肠癌患者远程随访计划的可接受性、生活质量和成本概述。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jul;47(7):1637-1644. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.12.018. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
2
Not as Stable as We Think: A Descriptive Study of 12 Monthly Assessments of Fear of Cancer Recurrence Among Curatively-Treated Breast Cancer Survivors 0-5 Years After Surgery.不如我们想象的那么稳定:对手术后0至5年的乳腺癌治愈性幸存者进行的12个月癌症复发恐惧评估的描述性研究
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 2;11:580979. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580979. eCollection 2020.
3
基于高危个体的胰腺癌监测项目中的心理负担探索:一项瑞典横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 30;15(4):e097814. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097814.
4
Disproportionate cancer worries in ultra-short-segment Barrett's esophagus in Japan.日本超短节段巴雷特食管患者中过度的癌症担忧
DEN Open. 2024 Jan 13;4(1):e329. doi: 10.1002/deo2.329. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Direct letters to relatives at risk of hereditary cancer-study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial of healthcare-assisted versus family-mediated risk disclosure at Swedish cancer genetics clinics (DIRECT-study).直接致信有遗传性癌症风险的亲属 - 瑞典癌症遗传诊所开展医疗辅助与家庭介导风险披露的多中心随机对照试验方案(DIRECT 研究)
Trials. 2023 Dec 17;24(1):810. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07829-5.
The impact of hypothetical PErsonalised Risk Information on informed choice and intention to undergo Colorectal Cancer screening colonoscopy in Scotland (PERICCS)-a randomised controlled trial.
假设的个性化风险信息对苏格兰结直肠癌筛查结肠镜检查的知情选择和意向的影响(PERICCS)-一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med. 2020 Oct 20;18(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01750-3.
4
Public support for healthcare-mediated disclosure of hereditary cancer risk information: Results from a population-based survey in Sweden.公众对医疗保健介导的遗传性癌症风险信息披露的支持:瑞典一项基于人群的调查结果。
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2020 Sep 15;18:18. doi: 10.1186/s13053-020-00151-0. eCollection 2020.
5
A prevalence and psychometric study on fear of cancer in women with abnormal cervical cytology undergoing colposcopy.异常宫颈细胞学检查行阴道镜检查的妇女对癌症恐惧的流行率和心理计量学研究。
Psychooncology. 2020 Nov;29(11):1850-1855. doi: 10.1002/pon.5504. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
6
A Genomic Test for Colorectal Cancer Risk: Is This Acceptable and Feasible in Primary Care?结直肠癌风险的基因组检测:在初级保健中是否可接受和可行?
Public Health Genomics. 2020;23(3-4):110-121. doi: 10.1159/000508963. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
7
Psychological distress and quality of life following positive fecal occult blood testing in colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查中粪便免疫化学检测阳性后的心理困扰和生活质量。
Psychooncology. 2020 Jun;29(6):1084-1091. doi: 10.1002/pon.5381. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
8
Genetic counseling of patients with ovarian carcinoma: acceptance, timing, and psychological wellbeing.卵巢癌患者的遗传咨询:接受度、时机及心理健康
J Community Genet. 2020 Apr;11(2):183-191. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00427-6. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
9
A systematic review on the prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety and distress in long-term cancer survivors: Implications for primary care.长期癌症幸存者中抑郁、焦虑和痛苦症状的患病率系统评价:对初级保健的启示。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 May;28(3):e13086. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13086. Epub 2019 May 14.
10
Fear of cancer recurrence in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: A systematic review of the literature.青少年和青年癌症幸存者对癌症复发的恐惧:文献系统评价。
Psychooncology. 2019 Apr;28(4):675-686. doi: 10.1002/pon.5013. Epub 2019 Feb 17.