Suppr超能文献

丙泊酚与美索比妥作为电休克治疗麻醉剂的比较。

A comparison of propofol and methohexitone as anaesthetic agents for electroconvulsive therapy.

作者信息

Bone M E, Wilkins C J, Lew J K

机构信息

University Department of Anaesthesia, Leicester Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1988 Jul;5(4):279-86.

PMID:3058475
Abstract

This study was designed to compare the effects of propofol and methohexitone upon the haemodynamic changes during, and the recovery from, anaesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy. Thirty patients were included, each patient being studied on two successive treatments with both propofol 1-1.5 mg kg-1 body weight, and methohexitone 0.75-1 mg kg-1 body weight. The duration and intensity of the modified convulsion were similar for both agents. There was no significant difference with respect of time to eye-opening, time to walking and observer assessment of recovery at 5 and 10 min for the two drugs. The direction of haemodynamic changes during the treatment were similar with both agents, although a significantly greater decrease (P less than 0.05) in diastolic arterial pressure following induction with propofol compared to methohexitone, and a significantly greater increase (P less than 0.05) in systolic arterial pressure following the fit with methohexitone compared to propofol, were noted.

摘要

本研究旨在比较丙泊酚和甲己炔巴比妥在电休克治疗麻醉期间及麻醉恢复过程中对血流动力学变化的影响。纳入了30例患者,每位患者先后接受两次治疗,分别使用1-1.5mg/kg体重的丙泊酚和0.75-1mg/kg体重的甲己炔巴比妥。两种药物引起的改良惊厥持续时间和强度相似。两种药物在睁眼时间、行走时间以及5分钟和10分钟时观察者对恢复情况的评估方面均无显著差异。治疗期间两种药物引起的血流动力学变化方向相似,不过,与甲己炔巴比妥相比,丙泊酚诱导后舒张压显著下降(P<0.05),与丙泊酚相比,甲己炔巴比妥惊厥发作后收缩压显著升高(P<0.05)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验