Bone M E, Wilkins C J, Lew J K
University Department of Anaesthesia, Leicester Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1988 Jul;5(4):279-86.
This study was designed to compare the effects of propofol and methohexitone upon the haemodynamic changes during, and the recovery from, anaesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy. Thirty patients were included, each patient being studied on two successive treatments with both propofol 1-1.5 mg kg-1 body weight, and methohexitone 0.75-1 mg kg-1 body weight. The duration and intensity of the modified convulsion were similar for both agents. There was no significant difference with respect of time to eye-opening, time to walking and observer assessment of recovery at 5 and 10 min for the two drugs. The direction of haemodynamic changes during the treatment were similar with both agents, although a significantly greater decrease (P less than 0.05) in diastolic arterial pressure following induction with propofol compared to methohexitone, and a significantly greater increase (P less than 0.05) in systolic arterial pressure following the fit with methohexitone compared to propofol, were noted.
本研究旨在比较丙泊酚和甲己炔巴比妥在电休克治疗麻醉期间及麻醉恢复过程中对血流动力学变化的影响。纳入了30例患者,每位患者先后接受两次治疗,分别使用1-1.5mg/kg体重的丙泊酚和0.75-1mg/kg体重的甲己炔巴比妥。两种药物引起的改良惊厥持续时间和强度相似。两种药物在睁眼时间、行走时间以及5分钟和10分钟时观察者对恢复情况的评估方面均无显著差异。治疗期间两种药物引起的血流动力学变化方向相似,不过,与甲己炔巴比妥相比,丙泊酚诱导后舒张压显著下降(P<0.05),与丙泊酚相比,甲己炔巴比妥惊厥发作后收缩压显著升高(P<0.05)。