Massimino Simona, Rinella Sergio, Buscemi Andrea, Similia Elisa, Perciavalle Vincenzo, Perciavalle Valentina, Petralia Maria Cristina, Di Corrado Donatella, Laspina Annarita, Coco Marinella
Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, I-95123 Catania, Italy.
Department of Research, Horus Social Cooperative, I-97100 Ragusa, Italy.
Biomed Rep. 2019 Jan;10(1):39-46. doi: 10.3892/br.2018.1174. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
The aim of the present study was investigate if there is an association between second-to-fourth digit length (2D:4D) ratio and personality factors capable of serving as predictors of individual choice towards high-risk activities in a group of experts skydivers; Furthermore, their skills in regulating anxiety and emotions were assessed. The 2D:4D ratio of the right hand of 41 expert skydivers was measured and each of them completed four questionnaires: Big Five Questionnaire-2 (BFQ-2), Profile of Mood States (POMS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y (STAI-Y) and Risk-Taking Inventory. Lower 2D:4D ratios did not appear associated with a greater propensity for taking risks but rather with a lower aptitude to assume precautions in unsafe conditions. In fact, the only sub-dimensions of personality, analyzed by the BFQ-2, correlated with the 2D:4D ratio were conscientiousness and agreeableness. Furthermore, prior to launch, the skydiver's level of stress, measured by the POMS, or state anxiety, measured by the STAI-Y, was not significantly correlated with 2D:4D ratio; whereas there was significant positive correlation between 2D:4D values and trait anxiety. Data analysis further revealed that social desirability correlated negatively with state anxiety and total mood disturbance index, and positively with emotion control. The present results suggest that lower 2D:4D ratio may represent a significant predictor of less attentive precautionary behavior when risk-taking.
本研究的目的是调查在一组专业跳伞运动员中,食指与无名指长度比例(2D:4D)与能够作为个体对高风险活动选择预测指标的人格因素之间是否存在关联;此外,还评估了他们调节焦虑和情绪的能力。测量了41名专业跳伞运动员右手的2D:4D比例,他们每人完成了四份问卷:大五人格问卷-2(BFQ-2)、情绪状态剖面图(POMS)、状态-特质焦虑量表Y型(STAI-Y)和冒险倾向量表。较低的2D:4D比例似乎与更大的冒险倾向无关,而是与在不安全条件下采取预防措施的能力较低有关。事实上,BFQ-2分析的与2D:4D比例相关的唯一人格子维度是尽责性和宜人性。此外,在跳伞前,用POMS测量的跳伞运动员的压力水平或用STAI-Y测量的状态焦虑与2D:4D比例没有显著相关性;而2D:4D值与特质焦虑之间存在显著正相关。数据分析进一步表明,社会期望与状态焦虑和总情绪紊乱指数呈负相关,与情绪控制呈正相关。目前的结果表明,较低的2D:4D比例可能是冒险时预防行为不够谨慎的一个重要预测指标。