Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH.
Departments of Nutrition.
J Nutr. 2019 Feb 1;149(2):286-294. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxy239.
The dietary insulin index (II) directly quantifies dietary effects on postprandial insulin secretion, whereas the empirical dietary index for hyperinsulinemia (EDIH), based on fasting C-peptide concentrations, is primarily reflective of insulin resistance. How these scores are related to nonfasting C-peptide in cohort studies has not been examined.
We investigated the extent to which EDIH and II scores predict plasma C-peptide concentrations, in cross-sectional analyses by postprandial duration at blood collection from 1 to ≥15 h.
Both EDIH and II scores were calculated from food-frequency questionnaire data reported by 3964 men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1993-1995) and 6215 women in the Nurses' Health Study (1989-1990) who were not diabetic. We constructed 12 multivariable-adjusted linear regression models separately in men and women, by postprandial duration, to calculate relative differences and absolute values of plasma C-peptide concentrations in dietary index quintiles.
In both men and women, C-peptide concentrations were elevated 1-2 h after eating and declined with increasing postprandial duration. In men, percent differences in C-peptide concentration in the highest compared with lowest dietary index quintile were: EDIH: 0-1 h: 50%; 2 h: 22%; 14 h: 14%; ≥15 h: 30% (all P-trend< 0.05). II: 0-1 h: 19% (P-trend = 0.09); 2 h: 3% (P-trend = 0.09); 14 h: -6% (P-trend = 0.17); ≥15 h: -15% (P-trend = 0.02). Corresponding results among women were: EDIH: 0-1 h: 29% (P-trend = 0.002); 2 h: 33% (P-trend = 0.009); 14 h: 44% (P-trend < 0.0001); ≥15 h: 40% (P-trend < 0.0001). II: 0-1 h: -12% (P-trend = 0.09); 2 h: 17% (P-trend = 0.09); 14 h: -14% (P-trend = 0.009); ≥15 h: -3% (P-trend = 0.37).
The EDIH was superior to the II in predicting both fasting and nonfasting C-peptide concentrations, suggesting that the EDIH may be better in assessing dietary effects of hyperinsulinemia on disease risk in adult men and women.
饮食胰岛素指数(II)直接量化了饮食对餐后胰岛素分泌的影响,而基于空腹 C 肽浓度的经验性高胰岛素血症饮食指数(EDIH)主要反映胰岛素抵抗。这些评分与队列研究中的非禁食 C 肽之间的关系尚未得到检验。
我们通过收集 1 至≥15 小时的餐后时间的横截面分析,研究 EDIH 和 II 评分与血浆 C 肽浓度的关系。
根据来自于未患糖尿病的 3964 名男性(来自 1993-1995 年的健康专业人员随访研究)和 6215 名女性(来自 1989-1990 年的护士健康研究)的食物频率问卷数据,计算了 EDIH 和 II 评分。我们在男性和女性中分别构建了 12 个多变量调整的线性回归模型,按餐后时间,计算了饮食指数五分位数的血浆 C 肽浓度的相对差异和绝对值。
在男性和女性中,进食后 1-2 小时 C 肽浓度升高,随着餐后时间的延长而下降。在男性中,与最低饮食指数五分位相比,最高饮食指数五分位的 C 肽浓度的百分比差异为:EDIH:0-1 h:50%;2 h:22%;14 h:14%;≥15 h:30%(所有 P 趋势 < 0.05)。II:0-1 h:19%(P 趋势 = 0.09);2 h:3%(P 趋势 = 0.09);14 h:-6%(P 趋势 = 0.17);≥15 h:-15%(P 趋势 = 0.02)。女性的相应结果为:EDIH:0-1 h:29%(P 趋势 = 0.002);2 h:33%(P 趋势 = 0.009);14 h:44%(P 趋势 < 0.0001);≥15 h:40%(P 趋势 < 0.0001)。II:0-1 h:-12%(P 趋势 = 0.09);2 h:17%(P 趋势 = 0.09);14 h:-14%(P 趋势 = 0.009);≥15 h:-3%(P 趋势 = 0.37)。
EDIH 在预测禁食和非禁食 C 肽浓度方面均优于 II,这表明 EDIH 可能更能评估高胰岛素血症对成年男性和女性疾病风险的饮食影响。