Suppr超能文献

比较两种商业家用犬(犬属)STR基因分型试剂盒在混种犬种群样本中进行法医身份计算的情况。

Comparing two commercial domestic dog (Canis familiaris) STR genotyping kits for forensic identity calculations in a mixed-breed dog population sample.

作者信息

Kanthaswamy S, Oldt R F, Montes M, Falak A

机构信息

School of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Arizona State University (ASU) at the West Campus, Glendale, AZ, 85306, USA.

California National Primate Research Center, University of California, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.

出版信息

Anim Genet. 2019 Feb;50(1):105-111. doi: 10.1111/age.12758. Epub 2018 Dec 28.

Abstract

Almost half of all US households own a dog (Canis familiaris). Though these household pets can attack humans and other animals, they are also frequently victims of cruelty, neglect and theft. In human-oriented investigations, the tendency of domestic dogs to leave behind physical traces (such as hair) can serve as valuable links between crime scenes and suspects/victims. This demonstrated utility of canine biological evidence has created demand for genotyping marker sets for canine forensic genetic testing. Through research and casework, short tandem repeat (STR) panels have been shown to be very efficient for identity and parentage testing in dogs. However, there is an absence of comparative studies between different canine forensic identification kits. The Thermo Fisher Scientific Canine Genotypes ™ Panel 1.1 and 2.1 Kits were originally designed and developed for routine and forensic use respectively, although both kits can be used for either purpose. In this study, we evaluated both STR panels to determine how critical forensic genetic metrics are affected by panel-to-panel variation in marker composition and design. Our results show that although STR panel composition can influence estimates such as inbreeding, combined power of discrimination and combined probability of exclusion, greater average allele number values exhibited across all markers in Panel 2.1 facilitated significantly more precise estimates of random match probability (RMP) and combined probability of identity. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a theta (θ) correction of 0.09 can be used to conservatively adjust RMPs generated from a small reference database of fewer than 50 samples, confirming that Panel 2.1 is a more robust forensic genotyping system than is Panel 1.1. for domestic dogs. We also demonstrate that opportunistic local sampling of fewer than 50 mixed-breed dogs can produce sufficient discriminatory and exclusionary power with either genotyping kit.

摘要

几乎一半的美国家庭都养有狗(家犬)。尽管这些家养宠物可能会攻击人类和其他动物,但它们也常常成为虐待、忽视和盗窃的受害者。在以人类为导向的调查中,家养狗留下物理痕迹(如毛发)的倾向可作为犯罪现场与嫌疑人/受害者之间的重要联系。犬类生物证据的这种实用价值催生了对犬类法医基因检测基因分型标记集的需求。通过研究和实际案例工作,短串联重复序列(STR)面板已被证明在犬类身份鉴定和亲子鉴定中非常有效。然而,目前缺乏不同犬类法医鉴定试剂盒之间的比较研究。赛默飞世尔科技的犬类基因型™ 面板1.1和2.1试剂盒最初分别设计用于常规和法医用途,不过两种试剂盒都可用于这两种目的。在本研究中,我们对这两种STR面板进行了评估,以确定法医基因关键指标如何受到标记组成和设计方面的面板差异影响。我们的结果表明,尽管STR面板组成会影响诸如近亲繁殖、综合鉴别力和综合排除概率等估计值,但面板2.1中所有标记显示出的更大平均等位基因数,有助于更精确地估计随机匹配概率(RMP)和综合同一性概率。此外,我们证明,对于少于50个样本的小型参考数据库生成的RMP,可使用0.09的θ校正进行保守调整,这证实面板2.1是比面板1.1更强健的家犬法医基因分型系统。我们还证明,对少于50只混种狗进行机会性本地采样,使用任何一种基因分型试剂盒都可产生足够的鉴别力和排除力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验