• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钛网在杂交减压手术中的放置位置以避免三平面颈椎脊髓病治疗中移植物下沉:头端还是尾端?

Placement of Titanium Mesh in Hybrid Decompression Surgery to Avoid Graft Subsidence in Treatment of Three-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Cephalad or Caudal?

机构信息

Second Department of Spine Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China (mainland).

Department of Orthopedics, Chinese People's Liberation Army 113 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China (mainland).

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2018 Dec 30;24:9479-9487. doi: 10.12659/MSM.912650.

DOI:10.12659/MSM.912650
PMID:30594945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6322716/
Abstract

BACKGROUND Hybrid decompression has been used to treat patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). However, no published study has investigated the effect of titanium mesh (TM) located cephalad or caudal in hybrid decompression surgery on the graft subsidence in treatment of three-level CSM. MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty-eight cases with three-level CSM who underwent the procedure of hybrid decompression from Jan 2014 to Jan 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Radiological outcomes immediately postoperatively and at the final follow-up were compared between cases from group A (TM located cephalad, n=21) and group B (TM located caudal, n=27). RESULTS No differences were observed in the 2 groups in terms of number, sex, or duration of follow-up. The average follow-up was 4.38±0.439 months in group A and 4.81±0.509 months in group B (p>0.05). The index loss of anterior (AIBH), middle (MIBH), and posterior interbody height (PIBH) in group A were 0.857±0.448/1.00±0.525/1.33±0.608, respectively, which were all lower than that in group B (P<0.05), as was the occurrence of TM subsidence. However, there was no significance difference in height loss of adjacent intervertebral space between groups. All angles were decreased at the final follow-up in both groups (p<0.05). More decrease of C2-C7 angle occurred in group B (p>0.05), and segmental angle in group A decreased more than in group B (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS TM inferior to intervertebral cage (IC) in hybrid decompression has a higher risk for developing subsidence, and when the choice of the position of TM is available in hybrid decompression surgery, TM located cephalad was recommend to alleviate TM subsidence.

摘要

背景

杂交减压术已用于治疗颈椎病(CSM)患者。然而,尚无研究调查杂交减压术中钛网(TM)置于颈椎上方或下方对治疗 3 节段 CSM 移植物下沉的影响。

材料和方法

回顾性分析 2014 年 1 月至 2017 年 1 月期间接受杂交减压术的 48 例 3 节段 CSM 患者的资料。比较 A 组(TM 位于颈椎上方,n=21)和 B 组(TM 位于颈椎下方,n=27)患者术后即刻和末次随访时的影像学结果。

结果

两组患者的例数、性别或随访时间无差异。A 组平均随访时间为 4.38±0.439 个月,B 组为 4.81±0.509 个月(p>0.05)。A 组前路(AIBH)、中路(MIBH)和后路椎间高度(PIBH)指数丢失分别为 0.857±0.448/1.00±0.525/1.33±0.608,均低于 B 组(P<0.05),TM 下沉发生率也较低。但两组间邻近节段椎间高度丢失无差异。两组患者终末随访时各角度均减小(p<0.05)。B 组 C2-C7 角减小更明显(p>0.05),A 组节段角减小大于 B 组(p>0.05)。

结论

在杂交减压术中,TM 位于椎间笼下方发生下沉的风险更高。当选择 TM 位置时,建议 TM 位于颈椎上方以减轻 TM 下沉。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7045/6322716/a3a836eacb13/medscimonit-24-9479-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7045/6322716/869176a7f8d8/medscimonit-24-9479-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7045/6322716/e67028cc2a1d/medscimonit-24-9479-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7045/6322716/9f4df077e964/medscimonit-24-9479-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7045/6322716/a3a836eacb13/medscimonit-24-9479-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7045/6322716/869176a7f8d8/medscimonit-24-9479-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7045/6322716/e67028cc2a1d/medscimonit-24-9479-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7045/6322716/9f4df077e964/medscimonit-24-9479-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7045/6322716/a3a836eacb13/medscimonit-24-9479-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Placement of Titanium Mesh in Hybrid Decompression Surgery to Avoid Graft Subsidence in Treatment of Three-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Cephalad or Caudal?钛网在杂交减压手术中的放置位置以避免三平面颈椎脊髓病治疗中移植物下沉:头端还是尾端?
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Dec 30;24:9479-9487. doi: 10.12659/MSM.912650.
2
The application of a new type of titanium mesh cage in hybrid anterior decompression and fusion technique for the treatment of continuously three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy.新型钛网融合器在混合式前路减压融合技术治疗连续三节段脊髓型颈椎病中的应用
Eur Spine J. 2017 Jan;26(1):122-130. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4888-3. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
3
[A comparative study between on-endcaps and non-endcaps titanium mesh cage for the treatment of elderly cervical spondylotic myelopathy complicated with osteoporosis approach for anterior cervical spine surgery].[用于治疗合并骨质疏松的老年脊髓型颈椎病的端帽式与非端帽式钛网笼对比研究:颈椎前路手术入路]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2018 Jan 25;31(1):5-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.01.002.
4
[Anterior revision surgery for the treatment of cervical spondylosis after anterior decompression and titanium mesh fusion].前路翻修手术治疗前路减压钛网融合术后颈椎病
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2014 Feb;27(2):132-6.
5
Comparison of anterior cervical fusion after two-level discectomy or single-level corpectomy: sagittal alignment, cervical lordosis, graft collapse, and adjacent-level ossification.两种手术方式(两节段椎间盘切除术或单节段椎体次全切除术)治疗颈椎间盘疾病后颈椎融合的比较:矢状位曲度、颈椎前凸度、移植物塌陷及临近节段骨化。
Spine J. 2010 Mar;10(3):193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.09.006. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
6
Evaluation of anterior cervical reconstruction with titanium mesh cages versus nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide66 cages after 1- or 2-level corpectomy for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study of 117 patients.钛网融合器与纳米羟基磷灰石/聚酰胺66融合器用于多节段脊髓型颈椎病单节段或双节段椎体次全切除术后前路颈椎重建的疗效评估:117例患者的回顾性研究
PLoS One. 2014 May 2;9(5):e96265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096265. eCollection 2014.
7
[Mid-term effectiveness of anterior decompression and fusion with nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 cage in treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy].纳米羟基磷灰石/聚酰胺66椎间融合器前路减压融合术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的中期疗效
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Sep;27(9):1085-9.
8
[Anterior corpectomy decompression and titanium mesh bone iraft fusion combined with titanium nate fixation for the treatment of the multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy].前路椎体次全切除减压钛网植骨融合联合钛钉内固定治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2016 Mar;29(3):211-5.
9
[Radiographic outcome analysis of three different fusion methods in maintenance of intervertebral height after cervical anterior corpectomy].[三种不同融合方法在颈椎前路椎体次全切除术后维持椎间高度的影像学结果分析]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Nov;50(11):981-6.
10
A Comparison of Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion Combined With Artificial Disc Replacement and Cage Fusion in Patients With Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.多节段脊髓型颈椎病患者前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术与人工椎间盘置换及椎间融合器融合术的比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Aug 15;40(16):1277-83. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000957.

引用本文的文献

1
SIRT1 in acute lung injury: unraveling its pleiotropic functions and therapeutic development prospects.SIRT1在急性肺损伤中的作用:揭示其多效性功能及治疗发展前景
Mol Cell Biochem. 2025 Mar;480(3):1449-1464. doi: 10.1007/s11010-024-05111-z. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
2
Myth or fact: 3D-printed off-the-shelf prosthesis is superior to titanium mesh cage in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion?误区还是事实:3D 打印的成品假体在前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术中优于钛网 cage?
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jan 26;25(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07213-7.
3
A Novel Capsule Lumbar Interbody Fusion (CLIF) in Treating Foot Drop due to Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: a Prospective, Observational Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk Factors of Cage Subsidence in Patients with Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament (OPLL) After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.颈椎前路融合术后伴后纵韧带骨化症(OPLL)患者 cage 沉降的危险因素。
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Jul 9;24:4753-4759. doi: 10.12659/MSM.910964.
2
Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus discectomy and fusion for the treatment of two-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: analysis of sagittal balance and axial symptoms.前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术与椎间盘切除融合术治疗双节段脊髓型颈椎病:矢状面平衡及轴性症状分析
Int Orthop. 2018 Aug;42(8):1877-1882. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3804-3. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
3
一种新型胶囊式腰椎椎间融合术(CLIF)治疗腰椎退行性疾病所致足下垂:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Pain Res Manag. 2021 Nov 12;2021:6880956. doi: 10.1155/2021/6880956. eCollection 2021.
4
Risk Factors and Radiologic Changes in Subsidence after Single-Level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy: A Minimum Follow-Up of 2 Years.单节段颈椎前路椎体次全切除术后沉降的危险因素及影像学变化:至少2年的随访
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2021 Sep 3;17(2):126-135. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2021.17.e23. eCollection 2021 Oct.
5
Hybrid decompression and reconstruction technique for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: case series and review of the literature.用于脊髓型颈椎病的混合减压与重建技术:病例系列及文献综述
J Spine Surg. 2020 Mar;6(1):181-195. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.12.08.
6
Risk Factors for Poor Prognosis of Cervical Spinal Cord Injury with Subaxial Cervical Spine Fracture-Dislocation After Surgical Treatment: A CONSORT Study.颈椎后路手术治疗下颈椎骨折脱位伴颈脊髓损伤预后不良的危险因素:CONSORT 研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Mar 16;25:1970-1975. doi: 10.12659/MSM.915700.
Hybrid Decompression and Fixation Technique for the Treatment of Multisegmental Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.
混合减压与固定技术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Aug 31;10:30. doi: 10.14444/3030. eCollection 2016.
4
The application of a new type of titanium mesh cage in hybrid anterior decompression and fusion technique for the treatment of continuously three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy.新型钛网融合器在混合式前路减压融合技术治疗连续三节段脊髓型颈椎病中的应用
Eur Spine J. 2017 Jan;26(1):122-130. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4888-3. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
5
Anterior corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of multilevel cervical myelopathy: A meta-analysis.前路椎体切除术与后路椎板成形术治疗多节段颈脊髓病的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2016 Nov;35:21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Sep 10.
6
Long-term clinical outcomes following 3- and 4-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.三阶段和四阶段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后的长期临床结果。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jun;24(6):885-91. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.SPINE15795. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
7
Hybrid Decompression Technique Versus Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion for Treating Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Which One Is Better?混合减压技术与颈椎前路椎体次全切除融合术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病:哪种方法更佳?
World Neurosurg. 2015 Dec;84(6):2022-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.08.039. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
8
Anatomy-related risk factors for the subsidence of titanium mesh cage in cervical reconstruction after one-level corpectomy.单节段椎体次全切除术后颈椎重建中钛网笼下沉的解剖学相关危险因素。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 May 15;8(5):7405-11. eCollection 2015.
9
Correlation between cervical lordosis and adjacent segment pathology after anterior cervical spinal surgery.颈椎前路手术后颈椎前凸与相邻节段病变的相关性。
Eur Spine J. 2015 Dec;24(12):2899-909. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4132-6. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
10
Comparison of anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.前路与后路治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2015 Aug;24(8):1621-30. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3911-4. Epub 2015 Apr 4.