• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理厌恶和道德判断的生理基础。

The physiological basis of psychological disgust and moral judgments.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Jan;116(1):15-32. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000141.

DOI:10.1037/pspa0000141
PMID:30596444
Abstract

To address ongoing debates about whether feelings of disgust are causally related to moral judgments, we pharmacologically inhibited spontaneous disgust responses to moral infractions and examined effects on moral thinking. Findings demonstrated, first, that the antiemetic ginger (Zingiber officinale), known to inhibit nausea, reduces feelings of disgust toward nonmoral purity-offending stimuli (e.g., bodily fluids), providing the first experimental evidence that disgust is causally rooted in physiological nausea (Study 1). Second, this same physiological experience was causally related to moral thinking: ginger reduced the severity of judgments toward purity-based moral violations (Studies 2 and 4) or eliminated the tendency for people higher in bodily sensation awareness to make harsher moral judgments than those low in this dispositional tendency (Study 3). In all studies, effects were restricted to moderately severe purity-offending stimuli, consistent with preregistered predictions. Together, findings provide the first evidence that psychological disgust can be disrupted by an antiemetic and that doing so has consequences for moral judgments. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

为了解决关于厌恶感是否与道德判断有因果关系的持续争论,我们用药物抑制了对道德违规的自发厌恶反应,并研究了这种反应对道德思维的影响。研究结果表明,首先,止吐药姜(Zingiber officinale),已知能抑制恶心,减少对非道德纯洁性违规刺激物(如体液)的厌恶感,这为厌恶感是由生理上的恶心引起的这一假设提供了首个实验证据(研究 1)。其次,这种相同的生理体验与道德思维有关:姜减少了对基于纯洁性的道德违规的判断的严重性(研究 2 和 4),或者消除了身体感觉意识较高的人比这种倾向较低的人做出更严厉的道德判断的倾向(研究 3)。在所有研究中,这种影响都仅限于中度严重的纯洁性违规刺激物,这与预先注册的预测一致。总之,这些发现首次证明了心理厌恶感可以被止吐药阻断,而且这种阻断会对道德判断产生影响。(APA,2018,所有权利保留)。

相似文献

1
The physiological basis of psychological disgust and moral judgments.心理厌恶和道德判断的生理基础。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Jan;116(1):15-32. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000141.
2
Disgust sensitivity is primarily associated with purity-based moral judgments.厌恶敏感度主要与基于纯洁的道德判断有关。
Emotion. 2018 Mar;18(2):277-289. doi: 10.1037/emo0000359. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
3
Trait physical disgust is related to moral judgments outside of the purity domain.特质性生理厌恶与纯洁领域之外的道德判断有关。
Emotion. 2014 Apr;14(2):341-8. doi: 10.1037/a0035120. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
4
Effects of Experienced Disgust on Morally-Relevant Judgments.经历厌恶情绪对道德相关判断的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 2;11(8):e0160357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160357. eCollection 2016.
5
Cognitive and personality correlates of trait disgust and their relationship to condemnation of nonpurity moral transgressions.特质厌恶的认知和人格相关性及其与非纯洁道德违规行为谴责的关系。
Emotion. 2019 Aug;19(5):889-902. doi: 10.1037/emo0000489. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
6
Disgust as embodied moral judgment.厌恶作为具身化的道德判断。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Aug;34(8):1096-109. doi: 10.1177/0146167208317771. Epub 2008 May 27.
7
Disgust and the moralization of purity.厌恶与纯洁的道德化
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Dec;97(6):963-76. doi: 10.1037/a0017423.
8
With a clean conscience: cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments.问心无愧:清洁可减轻道德评判的严苛程度。
Psychol Sci. 2008 Dec;19(12):1219-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02227.x.
9
On the role of attention and emotion in morality: attentional control modulates unrelated disgust in moral judgments.论注意和情绪在道德中的作用:注意控制调节道德判断中不相关的厌恶感。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Sep;38(9):1222-31. doi: 10.1177/0146167212448485. Epub 2012 May 29.
10
Group-based discrimination in judgments of moral purity-related behaviors: experimental and archival evidence.群体歧视对道德纯洁性行为判断的影响:实验与档案证据。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Dec;143(6):2135-52. doi: 10.1037/a0037831. Epub 2014 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The Challenge of the Yuck Factor in Public Acceptance of Engineered Living Materials.工程活材料公众接受度中“厌恶因素”的挑战。
Glob Chall. 2025 Apr 25;9(6):2400384. doi: 10.1002/gch2.202400384. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Review of the gastric physiology of disgust: Proto-nausea as an under-explored facet of the gut-brain axis.对厌恶情绪的胃部生理反应的综述:原恶心感作为肠脑轴中一个未被充分探索的方面。
Brain Neurosci Adv. 2024 Dec 20;8:23982128241305890. doi: 10.1177/23982128241305890. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Randomized trial on the effects of an EMDR intervention on traumatic and obsessive symptoms during the COVID-19 quarantine: a psychometric study.
眼动脱敏再处理疗法(EMDR)干预对新冠疫情隔离期间创伤及强迫症状影响的随机试验:一项心理测量学研究
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 26;15:1369216. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1369216. eCollection 2024.
4
Disgust Processing and Potential Relationships with Behaviors in Autism.自闭症的厌恶情绪处理与行为的潜在关系。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2023 Oct;25(10):465-478. doi: 10.1007/s11920-023-01445-5. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
5
Yikes! The Effect of Incidental Disgust and Information on Public Attitudes During the COVID-19 Pandemic.哎呀!新冠疫情期间偶发厌恶情绪和信息对公众态度的影响。
Polit Psychol. 2022 Oct 27. doi: 10.1111/pops.12865.
6
Defensive emotions and evaluative judgements: Sensitivity to anger and fear predicts moral judgements, whereas sensitivity to disgust predicts aesthetic judgements.防御性情绪和评价判断:对愤怒和恐惧的敏感性预测道德判断,而对厌恶的敏感性预测审美判断。
Br J Psychol. 2023 Feb;114(1):1-20. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12590. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
7
It's Time to be disgusting about COVID-19: Effect of disgust priming on COVID-19 public health compliance among liberals and conservatives.是时候对 COVID-19 感到恶心了:厌恶启动对自由派和保守派 COVID-19 公共卫生合规性的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 May 12;17(5):e0267735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267735. eCollection 2022.
8
A Psychology of Ideology: Unpacking the Psychological Structure of Ideological Thinking.意识形态心理学:剖析意识形态思维的心理结构。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Jul;17(4):1072-1092. doi: 10.1177/17456916211044140. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
9
Social threat indirectly increases moral condemnation via thwarting fundamental social needs.社会威胁通过挫败基本的社会需求,间接地增加了道德谴责。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 5;11(1):21709. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00752-2.
10
Infection threat shapes our social instincts.感染威胁塑造了我们的社会本能。
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2021;75(3):47. doi: 10.1007/s00265-021-02975-9. Epub 2021 Feb 10.