Olatunji Bunmi O, David Puncochar Bieke, Cox Rebecca
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 2;11(8):e0160357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160357. eCollection 2016.
Although disgust has been implicated in moral judgments, the extent to which the influence of disgust on moral judgment is distinct from other negative affective states remains unclear. To address this gap in knowledge, participants in Study 1 were randomized to a disgust (hand submersion in imitation vomit), discomfort (hand submersion in ice water), or neutral (hand submersion in room temperature water) affect condition while moral judgments of offenses were simultaneously assessed. The results showed that participants in the discomfort condition made the most severe moral judgments, particularly for moderate offenses. To examine if disgust may have more of an effect on some moral violations than others, participants in Study 2 were randomized to similar affect inductions while judgments of purity and non-purity offenses were simultaneously assessed. The results showed that those who had their hand submerged in imitation vomit recommended harsher punishment for purity violations relative to moral violations unrelated to purity. The opposite was true for those who submerged their hands in ice water, whereas punishment ratings for purity and non-purity violations did not significantly differ for those who submerged their hands in room temperature water. The implications of these findings for further delineating the specific role of experienced disgust in moral decision-making are discussed.
尽管厌恶情绪与道德判断有关,但厌恶情绪对道德判断的影响在多大程度上有别于其他负面情感状态仍不明确。为了填补这一知识空白,研究1的参与者被随机分配到厌恶(将手浸入仿呕吐物中)、不适(将手浸入冰水中)或中性(将手浸入室温水中)情感条件下,同时对违规行为进行道德判断评估。结果显示,处于不适条件下的参与者做出了最严厉的道德判断,尤其是对于中等程度的违规行为。为了检验厌恶情绪对某些道德违规行为的影响是否可能大于其他行为,研究2的参与者被随机分配到类似的情感诱导条件下,同时对涉及纯洁和不纯洁的违规行为的判断进行评估。结果显示,那些将手浸入仿呕吐物中的人相对于与纯洁无关的道德违规行为,对纯洁违规行为建议给予更严厉的惩罚。那些将手浸入冰水中的人则相反,而对于那些将手浸入室温水中的人,纯洁和不纯洁违规行为的惩罚评分没有显著差异。本文讨论了这些发现对于进一步阐明经历的厌恶情绪在道德决策中具体作用的意义。