• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索魁北克辅助技术满意度用户评估在意大利人群中的效度、信度和因素分析:一项横断面研究。

Exploring Validity, Reliability, and Factor Analysis of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology in an Italian Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Galeoto Giovanni, Colucci Mariele, Guarino Domenico, Esposito Giuseppina, Cosma Elisabetta, De Santis Rita, Grifoni Gianluca, Valente Donatella, Tofani Marco

机构信息

a Department of Public Health and Infective Disease , Sapienza University of Rome , Italy.

b ROMA - Rehabilitation & Outcome Measures Assessment , Sapienza University of Rome , Rome , Italy.

出版信息

Occup Ther Health Care. 2018 Oct;32(4):380-392. doi: 10.1080/07380577.2018.1522682. Epub 2018 Dec 31.

DOI:10.1080/07380577.2018.1522682
PMID:30596451
Abstract

This study explores validity, reliability, and factor analysis of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (IT-QUEST) for users of assistive technology devices in an Italian population. It was administered to 75 people to determine which of the 24 original items were relevant to the Italian context using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFAs and CFAs) were conducted with internal consistency and test-retest reproducibility also evaluated. The EFA and CFA showed that the 24-item survey may have limited relevance to the Italian context. We individuated 12 significative items, divided into two subscales, as well as the original validation. The test-retest showed high values of the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) (0.7-0.9), with a 0.812 ICC for the total scale providing support and evidence for Italian professionals to evaluate user satisfaction with assistive technology devices. This research also lays the foundation for developing a validation study of the IT-QUEST 2.0 that is relevant to the Italian culture. Further research may investigate psychometric properties involving more participants and different users of assistive technology devices.

摘要

本研究探讨了魁北克辅助技术用户满意度评估量表(IT-QUEST)在意大利人群中辅助技术设备使用者的效度、信度及因子分析。该量表施测于75人,通过探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析(EFA和CFA)来确定24个原始项目中哪些与意大利背景相关,同时还评估了内部一致性和重测信度。EFA和CFA表明,24项调查问卷与意大利背景的相关性可能有限。我们确定了12个有意义的项目,分为两个子量表,以及原始效度指标。重测结果显示组内相关系数(ICC)值较高(0.7 - 0.9),总量表的ICC为0.812,为意大利专业人员评估用户对辅助技术设备的满意度提供了支持和证据。本研究还为开展与意大利文化相关的IT-QUEST 2.0效度研究奠定了基础。进一步的研究可以调查涉及更多参与者和不同辅助技术设备使用者的心理测量特性。

相似文献

1
Exploring Validity, Reliability, and Factor Analysis of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology in an Italian Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.探索魁北克辅助技术满意度用户评估在意大利人群中的效度、信度和因素分析:一项横断面研究。
Occup Ther Health Care. 2018 Oct;32(4):380-392. doi: 10.1080/07380577.2018.1522682. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
2
Reliability and validity of the Italian version of Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST-IT 2.0) with users of mobility assistive device.意大利版魁北克辅助技术满意度用户评估 2.0(QUEST-IT 2.0)在移动辅助设备使用者中的信度和效度。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 Apr;16(3):251-254. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1668975. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): the development of the Taiwanese version.跨文化调适与验证魁北克辅助技术满意度用户评估量表(QUEST 2.0):台湾版本的发展。
Clin Rehabil. 2010 May;24(5):412-21. doi: 10.1177/0269215509347438.
4
Validation of the Greek version of the device subscale of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST 2.0).魁北克辅助技术满意度用户评估2.0(QUEST 2.0)设备子量表希腊语版本的验证。
Assist Technol. 2016 Fall;28(3):152-8. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2015.1131758.
5
A systematic review of the psychometric properties of Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST).魁北克辅助技术满意度用户评估量表(QUEST)心理测量特性的系统评价。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 May;19(4):1228-1235. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2161648. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
6
Cross-Cultural Validation of Quebec User Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 for Spanish Population (QUEST-2.0 ES).魁北克辅助技术用户满意度问卷 2.0 版(QUEST-2.0 ES)在西班牙语人群中的跨文化验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 30;19(15):9349. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159349.
7
The validity and applicability of the Chinese version of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction With Assistive Technology for people with spinal cord injury.魁北克脊髓损伤患者辅助技术满意度用户评估中文版的有效性和适用性。
Assist Technol. 2006 Spring;18(1):25-33. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2006.10131904.
8
Iranian translation and psychometric of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with Assistive technology (QUEST2.0) on wheelchair users.轮椅使用者对辅助技术满意度的魁北克用户评价量表(QUEST2.0)的伊朗语翻译和心理计量学评估。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 May;46(10):2125-2129. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2212179. Epub 2023 May 17.
9
The psychosocial impact of assistive device scale: Italian validation in a cohort of nonambulant people with neuromotor disorders.辅助设备量表的心理社会影响:神经运动障碍的非卧床人群队列中的意大利验证。
Assist Technol. 2020;32(1):54-59. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2018.1469553. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
10
Translation into Arabic of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology 2.0 and validation in orthosis users.将魁北克辅助技术满意度用户评估2.0翻译成阿拉伯语并在矫形器用户中进行验证。
Int J Rehabil Res. 2014 Dec;37(4):361-7. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000086.

引用本文的文献

1
Child Amputee Prosthetics Project-Prosthesis Satisfaction Inventory (CAPP-PSI): Validation of Italian Version in Children with Upper Limb Amputation.儿童截肢者假肢项目-假肢满意度量表(CAPP-PSI):上肢截肢儿童意大利语版本的效度验证
Children (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;12(2):130. doi: 10.3390/children12020130.
2
Sitting Postural Management to Prevent Migration Percentage Progression in Non-Ambulatory Children with Cerebral Palsy: Randomized Controlled Trial Preliminary Data.坐姿姿势管理预防非行走型脑瘫儿童移位百分比进展:随机对照试验初步数据
J Clin Med. 2024 May 27;13(11):3129. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113129.
3
Cross-Cultural Validation of Quebec User Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 for Spanish Population (QUEST-2.0 ES).
魁北克辅助技术用户满意度问卷 2.0 版(QUEST-2.0 ES)在西班牙语人群中的跨文化验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 30;19(15):9349. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159349.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic version of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (A-QUEST 2.0) in prosthesis users.阿拉伯语版魁北克辅助技术满意度用户评估量表(A-QUEST 2.0)在假肢使用者中的心理测量评估。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Feb;58(1):118-126. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06880-5. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
5
Return to Work and Quality of Life after Stroke in Italy: A Study on the Efficacy of Technologically Assisted Neurorehabilitation.意大利卒中后重返工作和生活质量:技术辅助神经康复的疗效研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 20;17(14):5233. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145233.
6
Quality of life, concern of falling and satisfaction of the sit-ski aid in sit-skiers with spinal cord injury: observational study.脊髓损伤坐式滑雪者的生活质量、跌倒担忧和坐式滑雪辅助器具的满意度:观察性研究。
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2020 Feb 7;6(1):8. doi: 10.1038/s41394-020-0257-x.