Kontos Michael C, Fordyce Christopher B, Chen Anita Y, Chiswell Karen, Enriquez Jonathan R, de Lemos James, Roe Matthew T
Internal Medicine (Cardiology Division), Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Division of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Mar;42(3):352-357. doi: 10.1002/clc.23146. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
Little is known about how differences in out of hospital cardiac arrest patient volume affect in-hospital myocardial infarction (MI) mortality.
Hospitals accepting cardiac arrest transfers will have increased hospital MI mortality.
MI patients (ST elevation MI [STEMI] and non-ST elevation MI [NSTEMI]) in the Acute Coronary Treatment Intervention Outcomes Network Registry were included. Hospital variation of cardiac arrest and temporal trend of the proportion of cardiac arrest MI patients were explored. Hospitals were divided into tertiles based on the proportion of cardiac arrest MI patients, and association between in-hospital mortality and hospital tertiles of cardiac arrest was compared using logistic regression adjusting for case mix.
A total of 252 882 patients from 224 hospitals were included, of whom 9682 (3.8%) had cardiac arrest (1.6% of NSTEMI and 7.5% of STEMI patients). The proportion of MI patients who had cardiac arrest admitted to each hospital was relatively low (median 3.7% [25th, 75th percentiles: 3.0%, 4.5%]).with a range of 4.2% to 12.4% in the high-volume tertiles. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality increased with tertile: low 3.8%, intermediate 4.6%, and high 4.7% (P < 0.001); this was no longer significantly different after adjustment (intermediate vs high tertile odds ratio (OR) = 1.02; 95% confidence interval [0.90-1.16], low vs high tertile OR = 0.93 [0.83, 1.05]).
The proportion of MI patients who have cardiac arrest is low. In-hospital mortality among all MI patients did not differ significantly between hospitals that had increased proportions of cardiac arrest MI patients. For most hospitals, overall MI mortality is unlikely to be adversely affected by treating cardiac arrest patients with MI.
关于院外心脏骤停患者数量差异如何影响院内心肌梗死(MI)死亡率,目前所知甚少。
接收心脏骤停转诊患者的医院,其院内MI死亡率会升高。
纳入急性冠状动脉治疗干预结果网络注册研究中的MI患者(ST段抬高型MI [STEMI]和非ST段抬高型MI [NSTEMI])。探讨了心脏骤停的医院差异以及心脏骤停MI患者比例的时间趋势。根据心脏骤停MI患者的比例将医院分为三分位数,并使用病例组合调整后的逻辑回归比较院内死亡率与心脏骤停医院三分位数之间的关联。
共纳入来自224家医院的252882例患者,其中9682例(3.8%)发生心脏骤停(NSTEMI患者中的1.6%和STEMI患者中的7.5%)。每家医院收治的发生心脏骤停的MI患者比例相对较低(中位数为3.7% [第25、75百分位数:3.0%,4.5%]),高容量三分位数医院的比例范围为4.2%至12.4%。未经调整的院内死亡率随三分位数增加而升高:低三分位数为3.8%,中三分位数为4.6%,高三分位数为4.7%(P < 0.001);调整后差异不再显著(中三分位数与高三分位数的比值比(OR)= 1.02;95%置信区间[0.90 - 1.16],低三分位数与高三分位数的OR = 0.93 [