Laboratoire de Psychologie EA 4139, Université de Bordeaux, 3ter Place de la Victoire, 33 000 Bordeaux, France; Pôle de Soins de Réhabilitation de la Dordogne (PSRD), Centre Hospitalier Vauclaire, Lieu-dit Vauclaire, 24 700 Montpon-Ménestérol, France.
Laboratoire de Psychologie EA 4139, Université de Bordeaux, 3ter Place de la Victoire, 33 000 Bordeaux, France.
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Feb;272:369-379. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.042. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
While social cognition (SC) is widely recognized as being impaired in schizophrenia, little is known about the potential heterogeneity in individuals' functioning. Using a wide range of SC measures and a cluster-analytic approach, we compared SC profiles in the general population and in people with schizophrenia. A total of 131 healthy controls and 101 participants with schizophrenia were included. Groups were compared on sociodemographic, neurocognition, anxiety and depressive mood variables. Three profiles were identified in healthy controls: one with good SC abilities (Homogeneous SC group) and two with specific weaknesses in complex Facial Emotion Recognition (Low FER group) or Affective Theory of Mind (Low AToM group). However, these patterns were not found in participants with schizophrenia, who were characterized rather by levels of SC functioning (i.e., Low, Medium and High SC groups). Importantly, while the High SC group (47.9% of the sample) exhibited normal performances, the two others were underpinned by different pathological processes (i.e., alexithymia for Medium SC group or neurocognition dysfunctioning for Low SC group). These results have important implications for future research as well as for clinical practice regarding assessment methodology and therapeutic interventions.
尽管社交认知(SC)在精神分裂症中被广泛认为存在损伤,但个体功能的潜在异质性知之甚少。我们使用广泛的 SC 测量方法和聚类分析方法,比较了普通人群和精神分裂症患者的 SC 特征。共纳入 131 名健康对照者和 101 名精神分裂症患者。比较两组的社会人口统计学、神经认知、焦虑和抑郁情绪变量。在健康对照者中确定了三种特征:一种具有良好的 SC 能力(同质 SC 组),两种具有复杂面部表情识别(低 FER 组)或情感心理理论(低 AToM 组)的特定弱点。然而,这些模式在精神分裂症患者中并未发现,他们的 SC 功能水平(即低、中、高 SC 组)更为突出。重要的是,虽然高 SC 组(样本的 47.9%)表现出正常的表现,但另外两组则由不同的病理过程支撑(即中 SC 组的述情障碍或低 SC 组的神经认知功能障碍)。这些结果对未来的研究以及评估方法和治疗干预的临床实践具有重要意义。